National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Supporting Research and Analysis
Suggested Citation:"8 Program Balance." National Research Council. 1990. Update to Strategy for Exploration of the Inner Planets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12329.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"8 Program Balance." National Research Council. 1990. Update to Strategy for Exploration of the Inner Planets. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12329.
×
Page 29

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Space Studies Board Jump to Top Search: NewsJump to Science in the Subscribe to our FREE e- Headlines newsletter! NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL June 18, 2004 Current Operating Status 1990 Update to Strategy for Exploration of the Inner Planets 8 Program Balance The question of the relative scientific priority for exploration of the inner planets is discussed in depth in the 1978 report. It emphasizes comparative planetology and the value of planetary studies in understanding the Earth. The report selects limited goals of high importance and focuses on selected planets. The three planets with atmospheres receive the highest priority because, as stated, the comparative planetology of these bodies is a key to understanding the formation and evolution of the Earth, and its atmosphere, oceans, and planetary processes. The committee endorses the high priority of comparative planetology and believes that significant benefits may be derived from deeper study of Venus and Mars. Advances in our knowledge of the Earth and its environment for life are tied to progress in our understanding of the terrestrial planets as a class. The major environmental changes on Venus and Mars challenge our understanding of the terrestrial environment. Because of their similarities and valuable intercomparisons, the Earth, Venus, and Mars should be a special concern of solar system exploration within an overall balanced program. Nevertheless, for a full understanding of the planets we need increased knowledge about the Moon and Mercury. These two objects provide unique information about planetary evolution and processes. They record on their surfaces the bombardment history in the inner solar system and give direct information on the processes of impact cratering. They also contain a record of their initial differentiation and magmatic activity prior to about 3.8 billion years ago—information mostly missing on Venus, Earth, and Mars. The history of planetary accretion and differentation is a major unsolved problem for all the inner planets. The magnetic field of Mercury is the example most similar to that of our own planet, and consequently, for a better understanding of the Earth's internal geodynamics, the interior of Mercury might provide valuable comparisons. Similarly, the Moon's small core may have generated a magnetic field for about a http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ssb/innerch8.html (1 of 2) [6/18/2004 10:07:11 AM]

Space Studies Board billion years; determining the size of the lunar core will help scientists understand how this field was generated. The low priority of Mercury in the 1978 report was partly based on the technical statement that orbiting missions to that planet were prohibitively difficult. This technical barrier has disappeared with the discovery of mission scenarios that use successive gravity assists from Venus and Mercury itself to reach orbit. Thus, evolving scientific and technical understanding along with new discoveries has led to a more important status for the terrestrial bodies without atmospheres. Each object offers fruitful comparisons. The scientific strategy for the inner planets may focus on one planet or several, but not to the complete exclusion of any one. This requirement holds even if NASA’s commitment to manned exploration requires extensive scientific precursor studies of Mars and the Moon. The committee realizes that the broad goals of planetary science require a balanced program of basic science and exploration, which includes studies of all planets, the Moon, and select asteroids and comets in our solar system. The committee therefore endorses the statement from the 1978 report that on a time scale of two decades the general level of exploration for all the planets of the inner solar system should be brought into balance. The committee further recommends that exploration of the inner planets in the next two decades include further exploration of Mercury and Venus because a program of planetary exploration that includes only Mars and the Moon is scientifically inadequate. Last update 9/26/00 at 3:45 pm Site managed by Anne Simmons, Space Studies Board Site managed by the SSB Web Group. To comment on this Web page or report an error, please send feedback to the Space Studies Board. Subscribe to e-newsletters | Feedback | Back to Top Copyright © 2004. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ssb/innerch8.html (2 of 2) [6/18/2004 10:07:11 AM]

Next: 9 Internal Cooperation »
Update to Strategy for Exploration of the Inner Planets Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!