. "Appendix L: The Science and Technology of Privacy Protection." Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle Against Terrorists: A Framework for Program Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle Against Terrorists: A Framework for Program Assessment
sary to decrypt it. Access controls provide privileges of different sorts to specified users (for example, the system may grant John Doe the right to know that a file exists but not the right to view its contents, and it may give Jane Doe both rights). Access controls may also be associated with audit logs that record what files were accessed by a given user.
Because of the convergence of and similarities between communication and information technologies, the technologies face increasingly similar threats and vulnerabilities. Furthermore, addressing these threats and vulnerabilities entails similar countermeasures or protection solutions. A fundamental principle of security is that no digital resource that is in use can be absolutely secure; as long as information is accessible, it is vulnerable. Security can be increased, but the value of increased security must be weighed against the increase in cost and the decrease in accessibility.
Human error, accident, and acts of God are the dominant sources of loss and damage in information and communication systems, but the actions of hackers and criminals are also of substantial concern. Terrorists account for a small percentage of losses, financial and otherwise, but could easily exploit vulnerabilities in government and business to cause much more serious damage to the nation. Security analysts and specialists report a large growth in the number and diversity of cyberthreats1 and vulnerabilities.2 Despite a concurrent growth in countermeasures (that is, security technologies3) penetrations and losses are increasing. A data-breach chronology reports losses of 104 million records (for example, in lost laptop computers) containing personally identifiable information from January 2005 to February 2007.4 The Department of Homeland Security National Cyber Security Division reports that over 25 new vulnerabilities were discovered each day in 2006.5
The state of government information security is unnecessarily weak.
1
A.T. Williams, A. Hallawell, R. Mogull, J. Pescatore, N. MacDonald, J. Girard, A. Litan, L. Orans, V. Wheatman, A. Allan, P. Firstbrook, G. Young, J. Heiser, and J. Feiman, Hype Cyclefor Cyberthreats, Gartner, Inc., Stamford, Conn., September 13, 2006.
2
National Vulnerability Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Security Division, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security National Cyber Security Division/U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT), available at http://nvd.nist.gov/.
3
A.T. Williams, A. Hallawell, R. Mogull, J. Pescatore, N. MacDonald, J. Girard, A. Litan, L. Orans, V. Wheatman, A. Allan, P. Firstbrook, G. Young, J. Heiser, and J. Feiman, Hype Cyclefor Cyberthreats, Gartner, Inc., Stamford, Conn., September 13, 2006.
4
A Chronology of Data Breaches, Privacy Rights Clearing House.
5
National Vulnerability Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Security Division, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security National Cyber Security Division/U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT), available at http://nvd.nist.gov/.