National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$53.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Urban Stormwater Management in the United States (2009)
Water Science and Technology Board (WSTB)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C: Summary of Responses from State Stormwater Coordinators." Urban Stormwater Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
576
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Urban Stormwater Management in the United States

TABLE C-2 Compliance

State

Information on Compliance Rates

Estimate of Covered Facilities NonCompliant

Basis of Estimate

Period of Estimate

Comment

CA

Yes (Construction)

40 percent deficient in paperwork; 30 percent with inadequate E&S controls

MS4 construction audit in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, and large CGP construction sites

2002, 2004, and 2005

Prioritized large CGP sites for inspection

Yes (Industrial)

60 percent poor housekeeping practices; 40 percent incomplete SWPPPs

Transportation sector, plastics manufacturing inspections in Los Angeles County

2005 and 2007

 

NH

No

 

 

 

Inspect in response to complaints

OH

No

 

 

 

Inspect construction sites as a priority

OR

No

 

 

 

Do not compile data

VT

No

 

 

 

Plan to inspect for compliance

WV

Yes (Industrial)

66 percent failed to submit report

Monitoring report submittal tracking

2007

Mailed deficiency notices

WI

Yes (Construction)

38 percent with minor and 43 percent with major violations

A subsample of 1 percent of CGP sites

2007

Perform inspections annually; no central database tracking

Page
576