Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1
1
Introduction
The world’s climate is changing, and it will continue to change throughout the 21st century and
beyond. Rising temperatures, new precipitation patterns, and other changes are already affecting
many aspects of human society and the natural world.
Climate change is transforming ecosystems at extraordinary rates and scales. As each
species responds to its changing environment, its interactions with the physical world and the
creatures around it change—triggering a cascade of impacts throughout the ecosystem, such as
expansion into new areas, the intermingling of formerly non-overlapping species, and even
species extinctions
Climate change is happening on a global scale, but the ecological impacts are often local
and vary from place to place. To illuminate how climate change has affected specific species and
ecosystems, this document presents a series of examples of ecological impacts of climate change
that have already been observed across the United States.
Human actions have been a primary cause of the climate changes observed today, but
humans are capable of changing our behavior in ways that reduce the rate of future climate
change. Human actions are also needed to help wild species adapt to climate changes that cannot
be avoided. Our approaches to energy, agriculture, water management, fishing, biological
conservation, and many other activities will all affect the ways and extent to which climate
change will alter the natural world—and the ecosystems on which we depend.
What are ecosystems and why are they important?
Humans share Earth with a vast diversity of animals, plants, and microorganisms. Virtually every
part of the planet––the continents, the oceans, and the atmosphere––teems with life. Even the
deepest parts of the ocean and rock formations hundreds of meters below the surface are
populated with organisms adapted to cope with the unique challenges each environment presents.
In our era organisms almost everywhere are facing a new set of challenges; specifically, the
challenges presented by rapid climate change. How have plants, animals, and microorganisms
coped with the climate changes that have already occurred, and how might they cope with future
changes? To explore these questions we start with a discussion of how plants, animals, and
microorganisms fit together in ecosystems and the role of climate in those relationships.
Earth has a great diversity of habitats. These differ in climate, of course, but also in soils,
day length, elevation, water sources, chemistry, and many other factors, and consequently, in the
kinds of organisms that inhabit them. The animals, plants, and microorganisms that live in one
place, along with the water, soils, and landforms, make an ecosystem. When we attempt to
understand the impacts of climate change, thinking about ecosystems––and not just individual
species––can be helpful because each ecosystem depends on a wide array of interactions among
individuals. Some of these involve competition. For example, some plants shade others or
several animals compete for the same scarce food. Some involve relationships between animals
and their prey. Others involve decomposition, the process of decay that returns minerals and
organic matter to the soil. And some interactions are beneficial to both partners, for example,
bees that obtain food from flowers while pollinating them.
Climate influences ecosystems and the species that inhabit them in many ways. In
general, each type of ecosystem is consistently associated with a particular combination of
climate characteristics (Walter 1968). Warm tropical lands with year-round rain typically support
OCR for page 1
2 Introduction
tall forests with evergreen broadleaved trees. Midlatitude lands with cold winters and moist
summers usually support deciduous forests, while drier areas are covered in grasslands,
shrublands, or conifer forests. In a similar fashion shallow tropical-ocean waters harbor coral
reefs on rocky bottoms and mangrove forests along muddy shores, whereas temperate shores are
characterized by kelp forests on rocky bottoms and seagrasses or salt marshes on sediment-
covered bottoms. These major vegetation types or biomes can cover vast areas. Within these
areas a wide range of subtly different ecosystems utilize sites with different soils, topography,
land-use history, ocean currents, or climate details. Humans are an important part of most
ecosystems, and many ecosystems have been heavily modified by humans. A plot of intensively
managed farmland, a fish pond, and a grazed grassland are just as much ecosystems as is a
pristine tropical forest. All are influenced by climate, all depend on a wide variety of
interactions, and all provide essential benefits to people.
The lives of animals, plants, and microorganisms are strongly attuned to changes in
climate, such as variation in temperatures; the amount, timing, or form of precipitation; or
changes in ocean currents. Some are more sensitive and vulnerable to climate fluctuations than
others. If the climate change is modest and slow, the majority of species will most likely adapt
successfully. If the climate change is large or rapid, more and more species will face ecological
changes to which they may not be able to adapt. But as we will see later, even modest impacts of
climate change can cause a range of significant responses, even if the changes are not so harsh
that the organism dies. Organisms may react to a shift in temperature or precipitation by altering
the timing of an event like migration or leaf emergence, which in turn has effects that ripple out
to other parts of the ecosystem. For example, such timing changes may alter the interactions
between predator and prey, or plants (including many crops) and the insects that pollinate their
flowers. Ultimately we want to understand how climate change alters the overall functioning of
the ecosystem and in particular how it alters the ability of the ecosystem to provide valuable
services for humans.
Ecosystems play a central role in sustaining humans (Figure 1) (Daily 1997; Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment 2005). Ecosystems provide products directly consumed by people. This
includes food and fiber from agricultural, marine, and forest ecosystems, plus fuel, including
wood, grass, and even waste from some agricultural crops, and medicines (from plants, animals
and seaweeds). Our supply and quality of fresh water also depends on ecosystems, as they play a
critical role in circulating, cleaning, and replenishing water supplies. Ecosystems also regulate
our environment; for example, forests, floodplains, and streamside vegetation can be critically
important in controlling risks from floods; likewise, mangroves, kelp forests, and coral reefs
dampen the impact of storms on coastal communities. Ecosystems provide cultural services that
improve our quality of life in ways that range from the sense of awe many feel when looking up
at a towering sequoia tree to educational and recreational opportunities. Ecosystems also provide
nature’s support structure; without ecosystems there would be no soil to support plants, nor all
the microorganisms and animals that depend on plants. In the oceans, ecosystems sustain the
nutrient cycling that supports marine plankton, which in turn supply food for the fish and other
seafood humans eat. Algae in ocean ecosystems produce much of the oxygen that we breathe. In
general, we do not pay for the services we get from ecosystems, even though we could not live
without them and would have to pay a high price to provide artificially.
OCR for page 1
Introduction 3
FIGURE 1 Ecosystem services. SOURCE: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005).
Ecosystem services rely on complex interactions among many species, so in most
environments it is critical that they contain a diverse array of organisms. Even those services that
appear to depend on a single species, like the production of honey, actually depend on the
interactions of many species, sometimes many hundreds or thousands. Honey comes from
honeybees, but the bees depend on pollen and nectar from the plants they pollinate. These plants
depend not only on the bees but also on the worms and other soil animals that aerate the soil, the
microorganisms that release nutrients, and the predatory insects that limit populations of plant-
eating insects. Scientists are still at the early stages of understanding exactly how diversity
contributes to ecosystem resilience—the ability of an ecosystem to withstand stresses like
pollution or a hurricane without it resulting in a major shift in the ecosystem’s type or the
services it provides (Schulze and Mooney 1993; Chapin et al. 1997; Tilman et al. 2006; Worm et
al. 2006). But we are already certain about one thing. Each species is a unique solution to a
challenge posed by nature and each species’ DNA is a unique and complex blueprint. Once a
species goes extinct, we can’t get it back. Therefore, as we look at the impacts of climate change
on ecosystems, it is critical to remember that some kinds of impacts—losses of biological
diversity—are irreversible.
What do we know about current climate change?
Over the last 20 years the world’s governments have requested a series of authoritative
assessments of scientific knowledge about climate change, its impacts, and possible approaches
OCR for page 1
4 Introduction
for dealing with climate change. These assessments are conducted by a unique organization, the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Every five to seven years, the IPCC uses
volunteer input from thousands of scientists to synthesize available knowledge. The IPCC
conclusions undergo intense additional review and evaluation by both the scientific community
and the world’s governments, resulting in final reports that all countries officially accept (Bolin
2007). The information in the IPCC reports has thus been through multiple reviews and is the
most authoritative synthesis of the state of the science on climate change.
Earth’s average temperature is increasing
In 2007 the IPCC reported that Earth’s average temperature is unequivocally warming (IPCC
2007b). Multiple lines of scientific evidence show that Earth’s global average surface
temperature has risen some 0.75°C (1.3°F) since 1850 (the starting point for a useful global
network of thermometers). Not every part of the planet’s surface is warming at the same rate.
Some parts are warming more rapidly, particularly over land, and a few parts (in Antarctica, for
example) have cooled slightly (Figure 2). But vastly more areas are warming than cooling. In the
United States average temperatures have risen overall, with the change in temperature generally
much higher in the northwest, especially in Alaska, than in the south (Figure 3). The eight
warmest years in the last 100 years, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies,
have all occurred since 1998 (http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20080116/).
During the second half of the 20th century, oceans have also become warmer. Warmer
ocean waters cause sea ice to melt, trigger bleaching of corals, result in many species shifting
their geographic ranges, stress many other species that cannot move elsewhere, contribute to sea-
level rise (see below), and hold less oxygen and carbon dioxide.
OCR for page 1
Introduction 5
FIGURE 2 Global trends in temperature. The upper map shows the average change in
temperature per decade from 1870 to 2005. Areas in orange have seen temperatures rise between
0.1-0.2oC per decade, so that they average 1.35 to 2.7oC warmer in 2005 than in 1870. The lower
map shows the average change in temperature per decade from 1950 to 2005. Areas in deep red
have seen temperatures rise on average more than 0.4oC per decade, so that they average more
than 2oC warmer in 2005 than in 1950. SOURCE: Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere
and Ocean, University of Washington.
OCR for page 1
6 Introduction
FIGURE 3 Temperature trends in North America, 1955 to 2005. The darker areas have
experienced greater changes in temperature. For example, the Pacific Northwest had average
temperatures about 1oC higher in 2005 than in 1955, while Alaska’s average temperature had
risen by over 2oC. SOURCE: Created with data from Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Sea levels are rising
Climate change also means that sea levels are rising. Not only do warmer temperatures cause
glaciers and land ice to melt (adding more volume to oceans), but seawater also expands in
volume as it warms. The global average sea level rose by just under 2 mm/yr (0.08in/yr) during
the 20th century, but since satellite measurements began in 1992, the rate has been 3.1 mm/year
(0.12in/yr)(IPCC 2007a). Along some parts of the U.S. coast, tide gauge records show that sea
level rose even faster (up to 10 mm/yr, 0.39in/yr) because the land is also subsiding. As sea level
rises, shoreline retreat has been taking place along most of the nation’s sandy or muddy
shorelines, and substantial coastal wetlands have been lost due to the combined effects of sea-
level rise and direct human activities. In Louisiana alone, 4900 km2 (1900 mi2) of wetlands have
been lost since 1900 as a result of high rates of relative sea-level rise together with curtailment of
the supply of riverborne sediments needed to build wetland soils. The loss of these wetlands has
diminished the ability of that region to provide many ecosystem services, including commercial
fisheries, recreational hunting and fishing, and habitats for rare, threatened, and migratory
species, as well as weakening the region’s capacity to absorb storm surges like those caused by
Hurricane Katrina (Day et al. 2007). Higher sea levels can also change the salinity and water
circulation patterns of coastal estuaries and bays, with varying consequences for the mix of
species that can thrive there.
OCR for page 1
Introduction 7
Other effects are being seen
Water Cycle
Climate change is linked to a number of other changes that already can be seen around the world.
These include earlier spring snowmelt and peak stream flow, melting mountain glaciers, a
dramatic decrease in sea ice during the arctic summer, and increasing frequency of extreme
weather events, including the most intense hurricanes (IPCC 2007b). Changes in average annual
precipitation have varied from place to place in the United States (Figure 4).
Climate dynamics and the cycling of water between land, rivers and lakes, and clouds and
oceans are closely connected. Climate change to date has produced complicated effects on water
balances, supply, demand, and quality. When winter precipitation falls as rain instead of snow
and as mountain snowpacks melt earlier, less water is “stored” in the form of snow for slow
release throughout the summer (Mote 2003), when it is needed by the wildlife in and around
streams and rivers and for agriculture and domestic uses. Even if the amount of precipitation
does not change, warmer temperatures mean that moisture evaporates more quickly, so that the
amount of moisture available to plants declines. The complex interaction between temperature
and water demand and availability means that climate change can have many different kinds of
effects on ecosystems.
FIGURE 4 Trends in precipitation from 1901 to 2006 in the United States. Areas in red are
averaging some 30 percent less precipitation per year now than they received early in the 1900s.
Dark blue areas are averaging 50 percent more precipitation per year. SOURCE: Backlund 2008.
Created with data from the USGS and NOAA/NCDC.
Extreme Events
The character of extreme weather and climate events is also changing on a global scale. The
number of frost days in midlatitude regions is decreasing, while the number of days with extreme
warm temperatures is increasing. Many land regions have experienced an increase in days with
very heavy rain, but the recent CCSP report on climate extremes concluded that “there are recent
OCR for page 1
8 Introduction
regional tendencies toward more severe droughts in the southwestern U.S., parts of Canada and
Alaska, and Mexico” (Kunkel et al. 2008, Dai et al. 2004; Seager et al., 2007).
These seemingly contradictory changes are consistent with a climate in which a greater
input of heat energy is leading to a more active water cycle. In addition, warmer ocean
temperatures are associated with the recent increase in the fraction of hurricanes that grow to the
most destructive categories 4 and 5 (Emanuel 2005; Webster et al. 2005).
Arctic Sea Ice
Every year the area covered by sea ice in the Arctic Ocean expands in the winter and contracts in
the summer. In the first half of the 20th century the annual minimum sea-ice area in the Arctic
was usually in the range of 10 to 11 million km2 (3.86 to 4.25 million mi2) (ACIA 2005). In
September 2007 sea-ice area hit a single-day minimum of 4.1 million km2 (1.64 million mi2), a
loss of about half since the 1950s (Serreze et al. 2007). The decrease in area is matched by a
dramatic decrease in thickness. From 1975 to 2000 the average thickness of Arctic sea ice
decreased by 33 percent, from 3.7 to 2.5 m (12.3 to 8.3 ft) (Rothrock et al. 2008).
Ocean Acidification
About one-third of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity has already been taken up by
the oceans, thus moderating the increase of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere and
global warming. But, as the carbon dioxide dissolves in sea water, carbonic acid is formed,
which has the effect of acidifying, or lowering the pH, of the ocean (Orr et al. 2005). Although
not caused by warming, acidification is a result of the increase of carbon dioxide, the same major
greenhouse gas that causes warming. Ocean acidification has many impacts on marine
ecosystems. To date, laboratory experiments have shown that although ocean acidification may
be beneficial to a few species, it will likely be highly detrimental to a substantial number of
species ranging from corals to lobsters and from sea urchins to mollusks (Raven et al. 2005;
Doney et al. 2008; Fabry et al. 2008).
Causes of climate change
Both natural variability and human activities are contributing to observed global and regional
warming, and both will contribute to future climate trends. It is very likely that most of the
observed warming for the last 50 years has been due to the increase in greenhouse gases related
to human activities (in IPCC reports, “very likely” specifically means that scientists believe the
statement is at least 90 percent likely to be true; “likely” specifically means about two-thirds to
90 percent likely to be true [IPCC 2007b]). While debate over details is an important part of the
scientific process, the climate science community is virtually unanimous on this conclusion.
The physical processes that cause climate change are scientifically well documented. The
basic physics of the way greenhouse gases warm the climate were well established by Tyndall,
Ahrrenius, and others in the 19th century (Bolin 2007). The conclusions that human actions have
very likely caused most of the recent warming and will likely cause more in the future are based
on the vast preponderance of accumulated scientific evidence from many different kinds of
observations (IPCC 2007b). Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, human activities
that clear land or burn fossil fuels have been injecting rapidly increasing amounts of greenhouse
gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) into the atmosphere. In 2006 emissions
of CO2 were about 36 billion metric tons (39.6 billion English tons), or about 5.5 metric tons (6.0
English tons) for every human being (Raupach et al. 2007). In the United States average CO2
OCR for page 1
Introduction 9
emissions in 2006 were approximately 55 kg (120 lb) per person per day. As a consequence of
these emissions, atmospheric CO2 has increased by about 35 percent since 1850. Scientists know
that the increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are due to human activities, not natural
processes, because they can fingerprint carbon dioxide (for example, by the mix of carbon
isotopes it contains, its spatial pattern, and trends in concentration over time) and identify the
sources. Concentrations of other greenhouse gases have also increased, some even more than
CO2 in percentage terms (Figure 5). Methane, which is 25 times more effective per molecule at
trapping heat than CO2, has increased by 150 percent. Nitrous oxide (N2O), which is nearly 300
times more effective per molecule than CO2 at trapping heat, has increased by over 20 percent
(Forster et al. 2007). Scientific knowledge of climate is far from complete. Much remains to be
learned about the factors that control the sensitivity of climate to increases in greenhouse gases,
rates of change, and the regional outcomes of the global changes. These uncertainties, however,
concern the details and not the core mechanisms that give scientists high confidence in their
basic conclusions.
OCR for page 1
10 Introduction
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4 and N2O over the last 10,000 years (large panels) and since 1750 (inset
panels). Measurements are shown from ice cores (symbols with different colors for different studies) and
atmospheric samples (red lines). The corresponding radiative forcings (amount of energy trapped per unit area)
relative to 1750 are shown on the right hand axes of the large panels. Source: IPCC 2007d.
FIGURE 5: Historical concentrations of greenhouse gasses CO2, CH4, and N2O over the past
10,000 years. For each of these greenhouse gases, the characteristic “hockey stick” shape of the
OCR for page 1
Introduction 11
curve is the result of large increases in the concentrations of these gases very recently, compared
to their relatively stable levels over the past 10,000 years. SOURCE: IPCC 2007d.
What do we expect from future climate change?
Evidence of rising atmospheric and ocean temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, rising
sea levels, and decreasing sea ice is already clear. Average temperatures will almost certainly be
warmer in the future. The amount of future climate change depends on human actions. A large
number of experiments with climate models indicate that if the world continues to emphasize
rapid economic development powered by fossil fuels, it will probably experience dramatic
warming during the 21st century. For this kind of “business as usual” future the IPCC (IPCC
2007b) projects a likely range of global warming over 1990 levels of 2.4-6.4ºC (4.3-11.5ºF) by
2100 (Figure 6, scenario A1F1). If greenhouse gas emissions grow more slowly, peak around the
year 2050, and then fall, scientists project a likely warming over 1990 levels of 1.1-2.9ºC (2.0-
5.2ºF) by 2100 (Figure 6, scenario B1).5
Temperature increases at the high end of the range of possibilities are very likely to
exceed many climate thresholds. Warming of 6°C (10.8°F) or more (the upper end of the
projections that the 2007 IPCC rates as “likely”) would probably have catastrophic consequences
for lifestyles, ecosystems, agriculture, and other livelihoods, especially in the regions and
populations with the least resources to invest in adaptation—that is, the strategies and
infrastructure for coping with the climate changes. Warming to the high end of the range would
also entail a global average rate of temperature change that, for the next century or two, would
dramatically exceed the average rates of the last 20,000 years, and possibly much further into the
past.
Mean seawater temperatures in some U.S. coastal regions have increased by as much as
1.1°C (2°F) during the last half of the 20th century and, based on IPCC model projections of air
temperature, are likely to increase by as much as 2.2-4.4°C (4-8°F) during the present century.
“Business as usual” emissions through 2100 would likely lead to oceans with surface
temperatures that are 2-4ºC (3.6-7.2ºF) higher than now and surface waters so acidified that only
a few isolated locations would support the growth of corals (Cao et al. 2007). Most marine
animals, especially sedentary ones, and plants are expected to be significantly stressed by these
changes (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007). Some may be able to cope with either increased
temperatures or more acidic waters, but adjusting to both may not be feasible for many species.
5
Projections of warming are given as a range of temperatures for three reasons. First, gaps in the scientific
understanding of climate limit the accuracy of projections for any specific concentration of greenhouse gases.
Changes in wind and clouds can increase or decrease the warming that occurs in response to an increase in the
concentration of greenhouse gases. Loss of ice on the sea or snow on land increases the amount of the incoming
sunlight that is absorbed, amplifying the warming from greenhouse gases. Second, the pattern of future emissions
and the mix of compounds released to the atmosphere cannot be predicted with high confidence. Some kinds of
compounds that produce warming remain in the atmosphere only a few days (Ramanathan et al. 2007). Others, like
CO2, remain for centuries and longer (Matthews and Caldeira 2008). Still other compounds tend to produce aerosols
or tiny droplets or particles that reflect sunlight, cooling the climate. Third, there is substantial uncertainty about the
future role of the oceans and ecosystems on land. In the past, oceans and land ecosystems have stored, at least
temporarily, about half of the carbon emitted to the atmosphere by human actions. If the rate of storage increases,
atmospheric CO2 will rise more slowly. If it decreases, then atmospheric CO2 will rise more rapidly (Field et al.
2007).
OCR for page 1
12 Introduction
Continued emissions under the “business as usual” scenario could lead by 2100 to 0.6 m
(2 ft) or more of sea-level rise. Continuation of recent increases in loss of the ice caps that cover
Greenland and West Antarctica could eventually escalate the rate of sea-level rise by a factor of
2 (Overpeck et al. 2006; Meehl et al. 2007; Alley et al. 2005; Gregory and Huybrechts 2006;
Rahmstorf 2007).
There will also be hotter extreme temperatures and fewer extreme cold events. An
increase in climate variability, projected in some models, will entail more frequent conditions of
extreme heat, drought, and heavy precipitation. A warmer world will experience more
precipitation at the global scale, but the changes will not be the same everywhere. In general, the
projections indicate that dry areas, especially in the latitude band just outside the tropics (for
example, the southwestern United States), will tend to get drier on average (IPCC 2007b; Kunkel
et al. 2008). Areas that are already wet, especially in the tropics and closer to the poles, will tend
to get wetter on average. Increased climate variability and increased evaporation in a warmer
world could both increase the risk and likely intensity of future droughts.
Changes in the frequency or intensity of El Niño events forecast by climate models are
not consistent (IPCC 2007b). El Niños are important because they are often associated with
large-scale drought and floods in the tropics and heavy rains just outside the tropics, but
projecting how the interaction between climate change and El Niño events will affect
precipitation patterns is difficult. Another example of inconsistent results from models is that
model simulations indicate that future hurricane frequency and average intensity could either
increase or decrease (Emanuel et al. 2008), but it is likely that rainfall and top wind speeds in
general will increase in a world of warmed ocean temperatures.
For all of these different factors––temperature, precipitation patterns, sea-level rise and
extreme events––both the magnitude and speed of change are important. For both ecosystems
and human activities, a rapid rate of climate change presents challenges that are different from,
but no less serious than, the challenges from a large amount of change (Schneider and Root
2001).
OCR for page 1
Introduction 13
Solid lines are multi-model global averages of surface warming for scenarios A2, A1B and B1, shown as
continuations of the 20th-century simulations. These projections also take into account emissions of short-lived
GHGs and aerosols. The pink line is not a scenario, but is for Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model
(AOGCM) simulations where atmospheric concentrations are held constant at year 2000 values. The bars at the right
of the figure indicate the best estimate (solid line within each bar) and the likely range assessed for the six SRES
marker scenarios at 2090-2099. All temperatures are relative to the period 1980-1999. SOURCE IPCC 2007b.
FIGURE 6 Projected future temperatures. This figure shows projected trends of average global
surface temperature, based on output from all of the major climate models, shown as
continuations of the 20th century observations (with the average for 1980-1999 plotted as 0). The
pink line represents what would happen if CO2 concentrations could be held constant at year
2000 levels. Scenarios B1, A1B and A2 represent alternative possible futures. A1B and B1 are
futures with modest population growth, rapid economic growth, and a globally integrated
economy, with A1B focusing on manufacturing and B1 focusing on service industries. A2 is a
world with more rapid population growth but slower economic growth and less economic
integration. The bars to the right of the graph represent the likely range of average global
temperature from the same models in the years 2090-2099 for a wider range of possible futures,
with the horizontal bar in the middle indicating the average across the models. As of 2006, actual
CO2 emissions were higher than those in the A2 scenario, making the full range of scenarios look
like underestimates, at least for the first years of the 21st century. (IPCC 2007b, Raupach et al.
2007).
OCR for page 1
14 Introduction
Climate change can impact ecosystems in many ways
Hundreds of studies have documented responses of ecosystems, plants, and animals to the
climate changes that have already occurred (Parmesan 2006; Rosenzweig et al. 2007). These
studies demonstrate many direct and indirect effects of climate change on ecosystems. Changes
in temperature, for example, have been shown to affect ecosystems directly: the date when some
plants bloom is occurring earlier in response to warmer temperatures and earlier springs.
Extreme temperatures, both hot and cold, can be important causes of mortality, and small
changes in extremes can sometimes determine whether a plant or animal survives and reproduces
in a given location.
Changes in temperature, especially when combined with changes in precipitation, can
have indirect effects as well. For many plants and animals soil moisture is critically important for
many life processes; changes in precipitation and in the rate of evaporation interact to determine
whether moisture levels remain at a level suitable for various organisms. For fish and other
aquatic organisms both water temperature and water flow are important and influenced by the
combined effects of altered air temperatures and precipitation. For example, warmer, drier years
in the northwestern United States, often associated with El Niño events and anticipated to be
more common under many climate scenarios, have historically been associated with below-
average snowpack, stream flow, and salmon survival (Mote 2003). Some salmon populations are
especially sensitive to summer temperatures; others are sensitive to low stream-flow volumes in
the fall (Crozier and Zabel 2006). The fact that climate change leads to rising seas means that
organisms and ecosystems located in coastal zones between the ocean and terrestrial habitats are
squeezed, especially when the coastal land is occupied by buildings or crops.
The ecological impacts of climate change are not inherently beneficial or detrimental for
an ecosystem. The concept that a change is beneficial or detrimental has meaning mainly from
the human perspective. For an ecosystem, responses to climate change are simply shifts away
from the state prior to human-caused climate change. Measured by particular ecosystem services,
some changes could be beneficial; for example, warmer temperatures extend the growing season
in some latitudes, and higher CO2 levels increase the growth of some land plants, with higher
potential yields of food and forestry products (Nemani et al. 2003). Others are detrimental, for
example, western mountain areas with a longer snow-free season are experiencing increased
wildfires, reduced potential wood harvests, and loss of some recreational opportunities
(Westerling et al. 2006). In some settings uncertainty about future ecosystem services may be a
cost in itself, motivating investments that may not turn out to be necessary or that may be
insufficient to effectively address changing needs. To date, many species have responded to the
effects of climate change by extending their range boundaries both toward the poles (for
example, northward in the U.S.) and up in elevation, and by shifting the timing of spring and
autumn events. Plants and animals needing to move but prevented from doing so, for example,
because appropriate habitat is not present at higher elevations, are at greater risk of extinction.
Shifting species ranges, changes in the timing of biological events, and a greater risk of
extinction all affect the ability of ecosystems to provide the critical services—products,
regulation of the environment, enhanced human quality of life, and natural infrastructure—they
have been providing.
OCR for page 1
Introduction 15
Ecosystems can adjust to change—over time
Ecosystems are not static. They are collections of living organisms that grow and interact and
die. Ecosystems encounter an ever changing landscape of weather conditions and various kinds
of disturbances, both subtle and severe. Whatever conditions an ecosystem encounters, the
individual organisms and species react to the changes in different ways. Ecosystems themselves
do not move, individuals and species do; some species can move farther and faster than others,
but some may not be able to move at all. For example, a long-lived tree species may take decades
to spread to a new range, while an insect with many hatches per year could move quickly. A
species that already lives on mountaintops may have nowhere else to retreat. Rapid and extreme
disturbances can have major and long-lasting ecological impacts. For example, a severe drought,
wildfire, or hurricane can fundamentally reshape an area, often for many decades. In one of the
most dramatic examples the impact of an asteroid 65 million years ago is believed to have so
radically changed conditions on Earth that the dominant animals, the dinosaurs, died off and
were supplanted by mammals (Alvarez et al. 1990).
On longer time scales, most places on Earth have experienced substantial climate
changes. During the peak of the last ice age, approximately 21,000 years ago, most of Canada
and the northern United States were under thousands of feet of ice (Jansen et al. 2007). Arctic
vegetation thrived in Kentucky, and sea levels were about 120 m (400 ft) lower than at present.
Over the past million years Earth has experienced a series of ice ages, separated by warmer
conditions. Global average temperatures during these ice ages were about 4-7°C (7.2-12.6°F)
cooler than present, with the cooling and warming occurring over many thousands of years
(Jansen et al. 2007). These ice ages triggered extensive ecological responses, including large
shifts in the distributions of plants and animals, as well as extinctions. The massive changes
during past ice ages certainly pushed ecosystems off large swaths of Earth’s surface as ice-
dominated landscapes advanced. However, these changes were generally slow enough that
surviving species could move and reassemble into novel, as well as familiar-looking, ecosystems
as the ice retreated (Pitelka et al. 1997; Overpeck et al. 2003). The 10,000 years since the last ice
age have seen substantial regional and local climate variation, but on a global scale climate was
relatively stable, and these regional climate changes did not drive species to extinction nor result
in the scale of global ecosystem change seen during glacial-to-interglacial transitions. Even when
the global climate is not changing noticeably, regional climate variability (droughts, storms, and
heat waves) can have dramatic regional (often short-term) impacts. In a period of climate change
it is important to remember that this climate variability will continue to occur on top of the more
long-term human-caused climate changes.
Data on ecosystem responses to disturbances in the distant past can provide valuable
information about likely responses to current and future climate change. But it is important to
recognize that the current rate of increase of CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere is faster than at any time
measured in the past, indicating that human-caused global climate change in the current era is
likely to be exceedingly rapid, many times faster than the long-term global changes associated
with onset and termination of the ice ages (Jansen et al. 2007). One of the big concerns about the
future is that climate changes in some places may be too fast for organisms to respond in the
ways that have helped sustain ecosystem services in response to natural changes in the past.
Understanding how quickly ecosystems can and cannot adjust is one of the key challenges in
climate change research.
OCR for page 1
16 Introduction
Climate change, other stresses, and the limits of ecosystem resilience
Climate change is not the only way humans are affecting ecosystems. Humans have a large and
pervasive influence on the planet. We use a substantial portion of the land for agriculture and the
oceans for fishing (Worm et al. 2006; Ellis and Ramankutty 2008). Many rivers are dammed to
provide water for crops or people, or they are polluted with fertilizer or other chemicals.
Chemical residues and the by-products of industrial activity, from acid precipitation to ozone,
affect plant growth. Human activities, especially land and ocean use, limit some opportunities for
species migrations while opening routes for other species. Globally humans have moved many
non-native species from one ecosystem to another. Ecosystems operate in a context of multiple
human influences and interacting factors.
Earth’s ecosystems are generally resilient to some range of changes in climate. A resilient
ecosystem is one that can withstand a stress like pollution or rebuild after a major disturbance
like a serious storm. A resilient ecosystem can cope with a drought or an unusually hot summer
in ways that alter some aspects of ecosystem function but do not lead to a major shift in the type
of ecosystem or the services it provides. Thus, a resilient ecosystem may not appear to be
affected by modest or slow climate changes. But this resilience has limits. When a change
exceeds those limits, or is coupled with other simultaneous changes that cause stress, the
ecosystem undergoes a major change, often shifting to a fundamentally different ecosystem type.
There is a threshold point when dramatic ecosystem transformations may occur (Gunderson and
Pritchard 2002). These thresholds are like the top of a levee as the water level rises. As long as
the water level is even slightly below the top of the levee, function is normal. But once it rises
above the levee, there is a flood. This kind of threshold response is common in ecosystems,
where extreme events like heat waves often serve as triggers for an irreversible transition of the
ecosystem to a new state.
Currently plants and animals are responding to rapid climate change while
simultaneously coping with other human-created stresses such as habitat loss and fragmentation
due to development, pollution, invasive species, and overharvesting. How do we know climate
change itself is causing major changes in ecosystems? First, species changing their ranges in the
Northern Hemisphere are almost uniformly moving their ranges northward and up in elevation in
search of cooler temperatures (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Parmesan 2006; Rosenzweig et al.
2007). If any or all of the other stressors were the major cause of ecosystem changes, plants and
animals would move in many directions in addition to north, and to lower as well as higher
elevations. Second, when we look at the association over time of changes between species ranges
and temperatures modeled using only natural variation in climate, such as sunspots and volcanic
dust in the stratosphere, the relationship is poor. When temperatures are modeled using natural
variability as well as human-caused drivers, such as emission of CO2 and methane, the
association is very strong. Consequently, humans are very likely causing changes in regional
temperatures to which in turn the plants and animals are responding (Root et al. 2005).