National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendixes
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 14
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 15
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 17
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 18
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 44
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"1 Acetone Cyanohydrin." National Research Council. 2009. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12503.
×
Page 49

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

1 Acetone Cyanohydrin1 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels PREFACE Under the authority of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (P.L. 92-463) of 1972, the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guide- line Levels for Hazardous Substances (NAC/AEGL Committee) has been estab- lished to identify, review, and interpret relevant toxicologic and other scientific data and develop AEGLs for high-priority, acutely toxic chemicals. AEGLs represent threshold exposure limits for the general public and are applicable to emergency exposure periods ranging from 10 minutes (min) to 8 hours (h). AEGL-1, AEGL-2, and AEGL-3, as appropriate, will be developed for each of five exposure periods (10 and 30 min and 1, 4, and 8 h) and will be distinguished by varying degrees of severity of toxic effects. The recommended exposure levels are considered applicable to the general population, including infants and children and other individuals who may be sensitive or susceptible. The three AEGLs have been defined as follows: AEGL-1 is the airborne concentration (expressed as parts per million [ppm] or milligrams per cubic meter [mg/m3]) of a substance above which it is 1 This document was prepared by the AEGL Development Team composed of Peter Griem (Forschungs- und Beratungsinstitut Gefahrstoffe GmbH) and Chemical Managers Larry Gephart and Ernest V. Falke (National Advisory Committee [NAC] on Acute Ex- posure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances). The NAC reviewed and revised the document and AEGLs as deemed necessary. Both the document and the AEGL values were then reviewed by the National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Acute Expo- sure Guideline Levels. The NRC committee has concluded that the AEGLs developed in this document are scientifically valid conclusions based on the data reviewed by the NRC and are consistent with the NRC guideline reports (NRC 1993, 2001). 13

14 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic, nonsensory effects. However, the effects are not disabling and are transient and reversible upon cessation of exposure. AEGL-2 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m³) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including sus- ceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape. AEGL-3 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m³) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including sus- ceptible individuals, could experience life-threatening health effects or death. Airborne concentrations below the AEGL-1 represent exposure levels that could produce mild and progressively increasing odor, taste, and sensory irrita- tion or certain asymptomatic, nonsensory effects. With increasing airborne con- centrations above each AEGL, there is a progressive increase in the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of effects described for each corresponding AEGL. Although the AEGLs represent threshold levels for the general public, including sensitive subpopulations, it is recognized that certain individuals, sub- ject to idiosyncratic responses, could experience the effects described at concen- trations below the corresponding AEGL. SUMMARY Acetone cyanohydrin is a colorless to yellowish liquid with a characteris- tic bitter almond odor due to the presence of free hydrogen cyanide (HCN). The major use of acetone cyanohydrin is in the production of methacrylic acid and its esters; the latter are used for the production of plexiglass. Further uses of acetone cyanohydrin are in the production of acrylic esters, polyacrylic plastics. and synthetic resins, as well as in the manufacture of insecticides, pharmaceuti- cals, fragrances, and perfumes. Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to acetone and HCN. Fatalities and life-threatening occupational intoxication have been de- scribed after accidental inhalation, skin contact, and ingestion. Initial symptoms after mild exposure to acetone cyanohydrin range from cardiac palpitation, headache, weakness, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting to nose, eye, throat, and skin irritation. Acetone cyanohydrin behaves as its molar equivalent in cyanide both in vitro and in vivo. All the pharmacologic actions of cyanide result from cyanide’s reversible complex with the ferric (+3) state of mitochondrial cyto- chrome c oxidase also known as ferrocytochrome c oxygen oxidoreductase. Cessation of electron transport across the inner mitochondrial membrane results in inhibition of oxygen utilization and causes hypoxia and cellular destruction. Four studies exposed rats repeatedly to acetone cyanohydrin at about 10, 30, and 60 ppm for 6 h/day (d), 5 d/week (wk) for a total of 4 weeks (Monsanto

Acetone Cyanohydrin 15 1986a; using groups of 10 male and 10 female rats), 10 weeks (Monsanto 1982b; using groups of 15 male rats) and 14 weeks (Monsanto 1986b; using groups of 15 male and 15 female rats) or for 6 h/d for 21 days (Monsanto 1982c; using groups of 15 female rats). Death was observed at 60 ppm after the first exposure in three animals of the Monsanto (1986a) study but not in subsequent exposures or in the other studies conducted under similar protocols. Preceding death, respiratory distress, prostration, convulsions, and tremors were obvious. In all studies, exposure at 60 and 30 ppm caused signs of irritation (red nasal discharge, clear nasal discharge, perioral wetness, and encrustations) during the first and subsequent weeks of exposure. At 10 ppm, red nasal discharge was not observed in one study (Monsanto 1986a); its incidence was not increased com- pared with the concurrent control group in two studies (Monsanto 1982b,c), but it was increased compared with the control group in the fourth study (Monsanto 1986b). No other signs of intoxication were reported in these four studies. The derivation of AEGL-1 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that local and systemic toxic effects of acetone cyanohydrin are due to free cyanide. Once ab- sorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-1 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cya- nohydrin. This procedure is supported by similar values that would be derived on the basis of available acetone cyanohydrin studies in rats (derivation basis would be exposure at 9.2 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks, which did not result in red nasal discharge [Monsanto 1986a]) using a total uncertainty factor of 10. The odor threshold of acetone cyanohydrin has not been firmly estab- lished. Shkodich (1966) published the odor threshold for acetone cyanohydrin in water (0.06 milligrams per liter [mg/L]). However, the odor would necessarily be the consequence of a mixed presentation of the HCN and acetone cyano- hydrin concentrations in air. Since no definitive reports on the odor threshold of acetone cyanohydrin were located in the literature, no level of distinct odor awareness (LOA) was derived. The derivation of AEGL-2 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equiva- lent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-2 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. This proce- dure is supported by similar values that would be derived on the basis of avail- able acetone cyanohydrin studies in rats using a total uncertainty factor of 10 (derivation basis would be exposure at 29.9 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks, which caused signs of irritation, while the next higher concentration produced respiratory distress, prostration, convulsions and tremors, Monsanto [1986a]). The derivation of AEGL-3 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of

16 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equiva- lent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-3 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. This proce- dure is supported by the close similarity of acetone cyanohydrin and HCN re- garding death in rats: Blank (1983) reported that 3 of 10 rats died after the first exposure to HCN at 68 ppm; the subsequent two exposures on the following days caused no additional deaths. This finding closely resembles that of Mon- santo’s (1986a) report of death of 3 of 20 animals after the first exposure to ace- tone cyanohydrin at 60 ppm (the actual exposure concentration on the first day might have been slightly higher than the average 59.6 ppm); no additional deaths were found in the 19 subsequent exposures. The derived values are listed in Table 1-1 below. 1. INTRODUCTION Acetone cyanohydrin is a colorless to yellowish liquid with a characteris- tic bitter almond odor due to the presence of free HCN (ACGIH 1996). The ma- jor use of acetone cyanohydrin is in the preparation of -methacrylic acid and its esters; the latter are used for the production of plexiglass. Further uses of ace- tone cyanohydrin are in the production of acrylic esters, polyacrylic plastics, and synthetic resins as well as an intermediate in the manufacture of insecticides, pharmaceuticals, fragrances, and perfumes (OECD 1997). About 0.5-1 million metric tons of acetone cyanohydrin is produced worldwide annually (IUCLID 2000) principally by reaction of HCN with acetone. Chemical and physical properties of acetone cyanohydrin are listed in Table 1-2. TABLE 1-1 Summary of AEGL Values for Acetone Cyanohydrina,b End Point Classification 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h (Reference) AEGL-1 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm Application of (Nondisabling) (8.8 (8.8 (7.0 (4.6 (3.5 AEGL-1 values mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) for HCN (NRC 2002) AEGL-2 17 ppm 10 ppm 7.1 ppm 3.5 ppm 2.5 ppm Application of (Disabling) (60 (35 (25 (12 (8.8 AEGL-2 values mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) for HCN (NRC 2002) AEGL-3 27 ppm 21 ppm 15 ppm 8.6 ppm 6.6 ppm Application of (Lethal) (95 (74 (53 (30 (23 AEGL-3 values mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) mg/m³) for HCN (NRC 2002) a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered. b Cutaneous absorption may occur; direct skin contact with the liquid should be avoided.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 17 TABLE 1-2 Chemical and Physical Data for Acetone Cyanohydrin Parameter Data Reference Molecular formula (CH3)2C(OH)CN IUCLID 2000 Molecular weight 85,1 E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 CAS Registry Number 75-86-5 IUCLID 2000 Physical state Liquid E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 Color Colorless E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 Colorless to yellowish ACGIH 1996 Synonyms 2-Propanone cyanohydrin; 2-cyano- IUCLID 2000 2-propanol; 2-cyano-2- hydroxypropane; hydroxyisobutyronitrile; 2-methyl- lactonitrile; 2-hydroxy-2-methyl- propionitrile; Acetoncyanhydrin Vapor pressure 1.07 hPa at 20°C IUCLID 2000 0.8 mm Hg at 20°C E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 1 mm Hg at 25°C E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 1.6 hPa at 40°C Grybat et al. 2003 12.5 hPa at 72°C Grybat et al. 2003 Density 0.932 g/cm3 at 19°C IUCLID 2000 0.9267 g/cm3 at 25°C IUCLID 2000 Melting point −19°C to −20°C IUCLID 2000 Boiling point 81°C at 30.7 hPa IUCLID 2000 82°C at 23 mm Hg E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998 95°C at 1013 hPa IUCLID 1996 (decomposition to acetone and HCN) Solubility Very soluble in water, alcohol and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and ether Co. 1998 Odor Characteristic bitter almond odor of ACGIH 1996 free HCN Explosive limits in air 2.2 % (LEL) to 12 % (UEL) IUCLID 2000 Conversion factors 1 ppm = 3.5 mg/m³ E.I. du Pont de Nemours and 1 mg/m³ = 0.28 ppm Co. 1998 Since the elimination reaction of HCN from acetone cyanohydrin is an en- dothermic reaction, the decomposition of acetone cyanohydrin is accelerated by heat. At temperatures of 120°C or higher, acetone cyanohydrin decomposes with

18 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels the evolution of HCN (IUCLID 2000). Rather than acting as mere diluents, wa- ter and ethanol (especially in the presence of amines) exert specific dissociative effects on acetone cyanohydrin (Stewart and Fontana 1940). The very rapid breakdown of acetone cyanohydrin with moisture would present some chal- lenges in any accidental spill or release. Because acetone cyanohydrin breaks down so readily to HCN and the toxicity is due to HCN, both materials are pre- sent in a mixture and the ratio of the two could be rapidly changing. Therefore, both materials would need to be tracked to give an indication of the risk. Acetone cyanohydrin in air can be specifically determined using solid sor- bent sampling (samples should be stored water-free and frozen to avoid decom- position), elution with a water-free solvent (ethylacetate), and gas chroma- tographic analysis (Glaser and O‘Connor 1985; NIOSH 1985). Methods for total cyanide determination involving sampling in alkaline solutions or infrared spec- troscopy also are available (Singh et al. 1986). Electrochemical detectors for HCN and Draeger tubes for HCN will not detect acetone cyanohydrin. However, these devices can be used to detect HCN that will form rapidly in a case of ace- tone cyanohydrin release because of its decomposition to acetone and HCN. 2. HUMAN TOXICITY DATA 2.1. Acute Lethality Although deaths have occurred from exposures to acetone cyanohydrin, specific exposure concentrations and exposure periods have not been reported (Sunderman and Kincaid 1953; NIOSH 1978; DECOS 1995; ACGIH 1996). Fatalities and life-threatening poisonings with clonic-tonic convulsions in work- ers have been described after inhalation (Krefft 1955) and skin contact (Sun- derman and Kincaid 1953; Thiess and Hey 1969) as well as after accidental in- gestion (Sunderman and Kincaid 1953). Following mild exposure to acetone cyanohydrin, patients presented with cardiac palpitation; headache; weakness; dizziness; nausea; vomiting; and nose, eye, throat, and skin irritation (Ballantyne and Marrs 1987; DECOS 1995). 2.2. Nonlethal Toxicity No relevant studies documenting nonlethal effects in humans after a single inhalation exposure to acetone cyanohydrin were located in the available litera- ture. Cases of intoxication in workers after dermal contact with acetone cyano- hydrin have been reported (Lang and Stintzy 1960; Zeller et al. 1969). Sunderman and Kincaid (1953) described at least three pumpers who lost consciousness during the packing operation of acetone cyanohydrin. The men recovered after they had been revived on exposure to fresh air and cleaning their hands. No permanent injury apparently occurred following these exposures. It had been noted that the pumpers usually had their hands covered with grease.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 19 When the employees had covered their hands, the effects of acetone cyano- hydrin were minimal, suggesting dermal penetration of acetone cyanohydrin as the principal route of exposure in these cases. The symptoms following mild exposure to acetone cyanohydrin were predominantly cardiac palpitation, head- ache, nausea, and vomiting. No details about the exposure conditions were re- ported. Oral exposure to acetone cyanohydrin may occur as a consequence of its liberation from linamarin, a cyanogenic glycoside found in cassava and other plant foodstuffs (Conn 1979). Linamarin is the common name given to a mole- cule composed of glucose and acetone cyanohydrin. Since toxic effects of lina- marin usually become evident only after long-term, low-dose exposure, toxicity data for linamarin are not considered relevant to AEGL development and thus are not presented here. Shkodich (1966) reported that according to a majority of people smelling and tasting acetone-cyanohydrin-containing water, the sensory threshold of smell for this substance is at a concentration of 0.06 mg/L and that of aftertaste is 0.48 mg/L. No experimental details were reported. 2.3. Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity No studies documenting potential developmental or reproductive toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin exposure in humans were located in the available litera- ture. 2.4. Genotoxicity No studies documenting the genotoxic potential of acetone cyanohydrin exposure in humans were located in the available literature. 2.5. Carcinogenicity No studies documenting the carcinogenic potential of acetone cyanohydrin exposure in humans were located in the available literature. 2.6. Summary Deaths associated with inhaled acetone cyanohydrin have occurred, but exposure concentrations are unknown. Likewise, airborne exposure concentra- tions for those who survived the initial acute intoxication were not provided, but in each instance, there was ample opportunity for skin absorption. No informa- tion on developmental or reproductive effects, genotoxicity, or carcinogenicity was located.

20 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels 3. ANIMAL TOXICITY DATA 3.1. Acute Lethality Lethality data are available for the rat; only one study reporting lethality in mice was located. The lethality data are summarized in Table 1-3. 3.1.1. Rats Smyth et al. (1962) exposed groups of six albino rats to acetone cyano- hydrin vapors that were produced by passing a 2.5-L/min-air-stream through a fritted glass disc immersed in 50 mL of acetone cyanohydrin. Doses were loga- rithmically distributed, differing by a factor of two (doses were not stated ex- plicitly). The observation period was 14 d. After exposure for 4 h, two of six rats were killed at 62.5 ppm and six of six rats were killed at 125 ppm. The maxi- mum time rats could be exposed to saturated vapor (about 1,300 ppm) without producing any deaths was 5 min. No other signs of toxicity were reported. Izmerov et al. (1982) reported an LC40 (concentration that is lethal for 40% of test organisms) of 185 mg/m³ (51.8 ppm) for 2 h in rats (no details re- ported). Sunderman and Kincaid (1953) using saturated vapors of commercially available acetone cyanohydrin reported that six of six rats died after 1.5 min. When the free HCN contained in the acetone cyanohydrin was removed by pre- cipitation with silver nitrate before exposure, the authors found that collapse occurred after an average time of 4 min and 50 % mortality after 10 min (the exact number of animals not stated). Monsanto (1986a) exposed groups of 10 female and 10 male Sprague- Dawley rats to acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 10, 30, or 60 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 20 exposure days (28 days in total). Concentrations in the exposure chamber were calculated by dividing the net amount of acetone cyanohydrin delivered to the chamber per unit time by the airflow per unit time and, in addition, measured by a Miran infrared analyzer (using the C-N triple bond frequency, which de- tects both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN) four times daily. For the total expo- sure period, mean analytic concentrations (± standard deviation [SD]) were de- termined as 9.2 ± 0.9, 29.9 ± 1.2, and 59.6 ± 1.4 ppm, respectively. In the highest exposure group, respiratory distress, tremors or convulsions or both, foaming at the mouth, and prostration were observed in four males following the first exposure. Three of the four animals died. No deaths occurred in the 29.9- ppm group (see section 3.2.4 for nonlethal effects). In three other studies con- ducted under similar protocols, no deaths were observed at 60 ppm for 6 h/d (Monsanto 1982b,c, 1986b) (see sections 3.2.1 and 3.3.1). The authors sug- gested that the differences between the 28-d study and the 14-week study (Mon- santo 1986b) were possibly due to the very steep dose-response for acetone

Acetone Cyanohydrin 21 TABLE 1-3 Summary of Acute Lethal Inhalation Data in Laboratory Animals Concentration Species (ppm) Exposure Time Effect Reference Rat Saturated vapor 1.5 min 6/6 animals died during Sunderman and (about 1,300 ppm) (time to death) exposure period; using Kincaid 1953 commercially available acetone cyanohydrin Rat Saturated vapor 10 min 6/6 animals died during Sunderman and (about 1,300 ppm) (time to death) exposure period; using Kincaid 1953 commercial acetone cyanohydrin with free HCN removed Rat 125 4h 6/6 animals died Smyth et al. 1962 Rat 62.5 4h 2/6 animals died Smyth et al. 1962 Rat 59.6 6 h/d, 5 d/wk, 3/20 animals died (deaths Monsanto 1986a 4 wk occurred after first exposure during which exposure to an elevated concentration may have occurred) Rat 58.6 6 h/d, 7 d/wk, No deaths in 24 animals Monsanto 1982c 21 d Rat 57.7 6 h/d, 5 d/wk, No deaths in 30 animals Monsanto 1986b 14 wk Rat 57.2 6 h/d, 5 d/w, No deaths in 15 animals Monsanto 1982b 48 d Rat 51.8 2h LC40 Izmerov et al. 1982 Mouse 574 2h LC50 Gabor et al. 1962 Mouse 19.6 2h LC30 Izmerov et al. 1982 cyanohydrin or to the normal variation in experimental animals of the same strain. Evaluation of the nominal and analytic concentrations revealed that the animals in the 60-ppm group may have been exposed to a slightly higher con- centration during the second half of the first day: the nominal concentration of 64.8 ppm for the first day was the highest of all days (mean for the other 19 ex- posure days was 60.4 ± 1.8 ppm), likewise, the last two analytic concentrations measured during the first day (55.5, 60.5, 63.5, and 63.5 ppm; mean 60.8 ± 3.8) were greater than those measured on all subsequent exposure days (the highest individual value for exposure days 2-20 was 61.5 ppm; mean for exposure days 2-20 was 59.5 ± 1.4 ppm).

22 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels 3.1.2. Mice Gabor et al. (1962) exposed albino mice to different acetone cyanohydrin concentrations (0.5-3 mg/L [40-840 ppm]) for 2 h. Deaths were reported as 0 of 10 mice at 140 ppm, 0 of 10 at 280 ppm, 8 of 10 at 420 ppm, 18 of 44 at 560 ppm, 4 of 10 at 700 ppm, and 10 of 10 at 840 ppm. The authors found a 50% narcosis level at 1.65 mg/L (462 ppm) and calculated a LC50 of 2.05 mg/L (574 ppm). The mouse strain, analytic methods, and post-exposure observation period were not reported. Izmerov et al. (1982) reported an LC30 of 70 mg/m³ (19.6 ppm) for 2 h in mice (no details were reported). 3.2. Nonlethal Toxicity No studies were located that evaluated nonlethal consequences of acetone cyanohydrin after a single inhalation exposure. Studies using repeated inhalation exposure reported signs of irritation, such as red nasal discharge and perioral wetness. These data are summarized in Table 1-4. 3.2.1. Rats Monsanto (1986a) exposed groups of 10 female and 10 male Sprague- Dawley rats to mean acetone cyanohydrin concentrations of 9.2 ± 0.9, 29.9 ± 1.2, and 59.6 ± 1.4 ppm, respectively, for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 20 exposure days (28 days in total) (see section 3.1.1). Three of 20 animals that inhaled 59.6 ppm died after the first exposure. The three animals that died and another animal that sur- vived showed respiratory distress, prostration, tremors and/or convulsions (ob- served in three of the four animals), and foaming of the mouth (observed in two of the four animals). During the first week of exposure, red nasal discharge was reported in 0 of 20 control animals, 0 of 20 animals in the 10-ppm group, 4 of 20 animals in the 30-ppm group, and 2 of 20 animals in the 60-ppm group (the au- thors reported incidences of irritation only for whole weeks, but not for single days). Reduced (p > 0.05) body weight was found in the high-exposure group. No gross or microscopic lesions attributable to acetone cyanohydrin exposure were observed. Total serum protein was reduced in male rats at all exposure concentrations but only statistically significant in the mid- and high-exposure groups. Monsanto (1986b) conducted exposures of 15 female and 15 male Spra- gue-Dawley rats to acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 10, 30, or 60 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 14 weeks. Concentrations in the exposure chamber were calculated by dividing the net amount of acetone cyanohydrin delivered to the chamber per unit time by the airflow per unit time and, in addition, measured by a Miran

TABLE 1-4 Summary of Nonlethal Signs of Acetone Cyanohydrin Exposure in Laboratory Animals Target [analytic] Species concentration (ppm) Exposure Time Effect Reference Rat 60 [57.2] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge in 14/15 animals vs. 10/15 in controls and perioral Monsanto 1982b 5 d/wk, 48 d wetness/red stain in 8/15 animals vs. 2/15 in controls during first 10-d period; 15 males tested Rat 60 [58.6] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge and encrustations during week 1 in 12/24 animals vs. Monsanto 1982c 7 d/wk, 21 d 6/24 controls; 24 females tested Rat 60 [59.6] 6 h/d, Respiratory distress, prostration, tremors and/or convulsions in 4/20, red Monsanto 1986a 5 d/wk,4 wk nasal discharge in 2/20 animals vs. 0/20 in controls during week 1; 3/20 males died after first day; 10 females and 10 males tested Rat 60 [57.7] 6 h/d, Bloodlike discharge about the nose in 20/30 animals vs. 6/30 in controls Monsanto 1986b 5 d/wk, 14 wk and clear nasal discharge in 2/30 animals vs. 0/30 in controls during week 1; no deaths occurred; 15 females and 15 males tested Rat 30 [28.5] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge in 12/15 animals vs. 10/15 in controls and perioral Monsanto 1982b 5 d/wk, 48 d wetness/red stain in 4/15 animals vs. 2/15 in controls during first 10-d period; 15 males tested Rat 30 [30.4] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge and encrustations during week 1 in 10/24 animals vs. Monsanto 1982c 7 d/wk, 21 d 6/24 controls; 24 females tested Rat 30 [29.9] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge in 4/20 animals vs. 0/20 in controls during week 1; Monsanto 1986a 5 d/wk, 4 wk 10 females and 10 males tested Rat 30 [28.6] 6 h/d, Bloodlike discharge about the nose in 18/30 animals vs. 6/30 in controls Monsanto 1986b 5 d/wk, 14 wk and clear nasal discharge in 3/30 animals vs. 0/30 in controls during week 1; 15 females and 15 males tested Rat 10 [10.0] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge during week 1 in 10/15 animals vs. 10/15 in Monsanto 1982b 5 d/wk, 48 d controls; 15 males tested (Continued) 23

24 TABLE 1-4 Continued Target [analytic] Species concentration (ppm) Exposure Time Effect Reference Rat 10 [10.7] 6 h/d, Red nasal discharge and encrustations during week 1 in 9/24 animals vs. Monsanto 1982c 7 d/wk, 21 d 6/24 in controls; 24 females tested Rat 10 [9.2] 6 h/d, No signs of irritation; 10 females and 10 males tested Monsanto 1986a 5 d/wk, 4 wk Rat 10 [10.1] 6 h/d, Bloodlike discharge about the nose in 17/30 animals vs. 6/30 in controls Monsanto 1986b 5 d/wk, 14 wk and clear nasal discharge in 3/30 animals vs. 0/30 in controls during week 1; 15 females and 15 males tested

Acetone Cyanohydrin 25 infrared analyzer (using the C-N triple bond frequency, which detects both ace- tone cyanohydrin and HCN). For the total exposure period, mean concentrations (±SD) were determined as 10.1 ± 0.9, 28.6 ± 1.8, and 57.7 ± 2.9 ppm, respec- tively. No deaths were observed. During the first week of treatment, bloodlike discharge about the nose was observed in 6 of 30 control animals, 17 of 30 ani- mals in the 10-ppm group, 18 of 30 animals in the 30 ppm group, and 20 of 30 animals in the 60-ppm group; clear nasal discharge was reported in 0 of 30, 3 of 30, 3 of 30, and 2 of 30 animals, respectively (the authors reported incidences of irritation only for whole weeks, but not for single days). No exposure related signs of toxicity or changes in hematologic or clinical chemistry parameters were observed. No effect on body weight was found. No gross or microscopic lesions attributable to acetone cyanohydrin were observed. Monsanto (1982b) exposed male Sprague-Dawley rats (15/dose group) by inhalation to acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 10, 30, or 60 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 48 exposure days (69 days in total). Concentrations in the exposure chamber were calculated by dividing the net amount of acetone cyanohydrin delivered to the chamber per unit time by the airflow per unit time and, in addition, measured by a Miran infrared analyzer (using the C-N triple bond frequency, which de- tects both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN). For the total exposure period, mean concentrations (±SD) were determined as 10.0 ± 1.0, 28.5 ± 1.9, and 57.2 ± 3.0 ppm, respectively. For the period of exposure days 1-10, red nasal discharge was observed in 10 of 15 concurrent control animals and in 10 of 15, 12 of 15, and 14 of 15 animals that inhaled 10, 30, or 60 ppm, respectively; perioral wetness and red stain was observed in 2 of 15, 2 of 15, 4 of 15, and 8 of 15 animals, re- spectively. (The authors did not report the incidence of signs of irritation for single days.) Monsanto (1982c) exposed female Sprague-Dawley rats (24/dose group) by inhalation to acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 10, 30, or 60 ppm for 6 h/d, 7 d/wk for 21 d. Concentrations in the exposure chamber were calculated by dividing the net amount of acetone cyanohydrin delivered to the chamber per unit time by the airflow per unit time and, in addition, measured by a Miran infrared analyzer (using the C-N triple bond frequency, which detects both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN). For the total exposure period, mean concentrations (±SD) were de- termined as 10.7 ± 0.4, 30.4 ± 2.1, and 58.6 ± 2.3 ppm, respectively. During the first week of exposure, red nasal discharge or encrustations were observed in 6 of 24 animals of the control group and in 9 of 24, 10 of 24, and 12 of 24 animals exposed to 10, 30, and 60 ppm, respectively. (The authors reported incidences of irritation for whole weeks only but not for single days.) 3.3. Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity 3.3.1. Rats No studies documenting potential developmental or reproductive toxicity

26 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels of acetone cyanohydrin after a single inhalation exposure were located in the available literature. In fertility studies, Monsanto (1982b) exposed male Sprague-Dawley rats (15/dose group) by inhalation to acetone cyanohydrin concentrations (±SD) of 0, 10.0 ± 1.0, 28.5 ± 1.9, or 57.2 ± 3.0 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 48 exposure days (69 days in total) (see section 3.2.1 for details and signs of irritation). After the treatment period, each male was mated consecutively with three untreated fe- males. There were no adverse effects of inhaled acetone cyanohydrin in males as indicated by mortality, mean body weights (the high-exposure group showed a lower mean body weight, which was not significantly different from that of the concurrent control group), clinical observations and necropsy (males were killed about 3 weeks after the end of the exposure period). The number of live im- plants and pre- and post-implantation losses were comparable for females mated with untreated or treated males. The authors concluded that exposure to acetone cyanohydrin at 60 ppm failed to demonstrate any potential for reproductive tox- icity in male rats. In fertility studies, Monsanto (1982c) exposed female Sprague-Dawley rats (24/dose group) by inhalation to acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 10.7 ± 0.4, 30.4 ± 2.1, and 58.6 ± 2.3 ppm for 6 h/d, 7 d/wk for 21 days (see section 3.2.1 for details and signs of irritation). There was no indication of a treatment-related adverse effect on body weight during exposure or during gestation. After cessa- tion of exposure, the females were mated with untreated males. At examination on gestational days 13-15, fertility of mated females was comparable between the treated groups and the control group for mating efficiency, pregnancy rates, number of live implants, and pre- and post-implantation losses. The authors concluded that repeated inhalation of acetone cyanohydrin at 60 ppm failed to demonstrate any adverse effects on fertility of female rats. Monsanto (1982a, 1983) treated groups of 25 pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats by gavage to 0, 1, 3, or 10 mg of acetone cyanohydrin per kilogram (kg) per day on days 6-15 of gestation. No deaths were observed. Maternal toxicity was evident by slight reductions in body-weight gain in the mid- and high-dose groups. Statistically significant differences between the high-dose group and controls were observed for the reduction of the number of corpora lutea per dam and the number of implantations per dam. Numbers of viable fetuses per dam, post-implantation losses per dam (nonviable fetuses, early and late resorptions), mean fetal body weight, and fetal sex distribution for all dose groups were com- parable with controls. The incidence of malformations and developmental varia- tions for all fetuses of treated animals were comparable with the concurrent con- trol group fetuses. 3.4. Genotoxicity In tests using different Salmonella strains, acetone cyanohydrin failed to yield a reproducible positive response. No mutagenic activity was observed in

Acetone Cyanohydrin 27 vitro using the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) gene mutation assay. No signifi- cant increases in the frequency of chromosome aberrations were observed in bone marrow cells of Sprague-Dawley rats (24 rats/sex/group) taken 6, 12, 24, or 48 h after administration of acetone cyanohydrin at 0, 1.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg by gavage (IUCLID 2000; E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998). 3.5. Carcinogenicity No information regarding the carcinogenic potential of acetone cyano- hydrin exposure was located in the available literature. Genotoxicity studies with cyanide salts were generally negative, and no cancers were induced in rats in a 2-y feeding study with HCN (NRC 2002). 3.6. Summary Inhalation data were available mainly for the rat. During exposure of rats, death was observed at saturated concentration (about 1,300 ppm) after 1.5 or 10 min (Sunderman and Kincaid 1953) or 5 min (Smyth et al. 1962). Other studies (failing to provide experimental details) reported death of two of six rats after 4 h at 62.5 ppm (Smyth et al. 1962), an LC40 of 51.8 ppm in rats, an LC30 of 19.6 ppm in mice (Izmerov et al., 1982), and an LC50 of 574 ppm for 2 h in mice (Gabor et al. 1962). In a series of studies exposing rats repeatedly at about 60 ppm for 6 h/d, deaths in 3 of 20, 0 of 20, 0 of 24, and 0 of 15 animals were ob- served (Monsanto 1982b,c, 1986a,b). Preceding death, respiratory distress, pros- tration, convulsions, and tremors were observed after the first exposure at 60 ppm (Monsanto 1986a). In the other three studies, exposure at 60 ppm and, in all studies, exposure at 30 ppm caused red nasal discharge and encrustations during the first week of exposure. At 10 ppm, the incidence of red nasal discharge was significantly increased in one of the four Monsanto studies. 4. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 4.1. Stability, Metabolism, and Disposition Upon release into moist air, acetone cyanohydrin decomposes to yield HCN and acetone. This process is accelerated by heat and catalyzed by the pres- ence of water. In dilute aqueous solutions, acetone cyanohydrin will fully de- compose. The half-life for decomposition is pH dependent and was calculated for a 0.1% solution as 57 min at pH 4.9, 28 min at pH 6.3, and 8 min at pH 6.8 (ICI 1993). From the rate constant for decomposition at pH 7 and 26°C of 4.47 h−1, a half-life of 9 min was calculated (Ellington et al. 1987). In the humid air and the moist mucosa of the respiratory tract, acetone cyanohydrin decomposes to yield its molar equivalent in HCN and acetone. This

28 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels reaction is a result of the physical chemistry of acetone cyanohydrin (Stewart and Fontana 1940), and it is not known to be enzyme-catalyzed in animals or humans (Kaplita and Smith 1986; DECOS 1995). Acetone cyanohydrin is miscible with water and is taken up by the moist respiratory passages. The pulmonary retention of acetone cyanohydrin has not been reported, but it is probably in the range for HCN (about 58%; ATSDR 1997), acrylonitrile (about 50%; ATSDR 1990), and acetone (70-80%; ATSDR 1994). Cyanide concentrations in liver and brain of CD-1 mice were similar af- ter a single intraperitoneal injection of an equimolar dose of acetone cyano- hydrin or sodium cyanide. After injection of acetone cyanohydrin at 9 mg/kg, 108.0 ± 27.5 and 30.0 ± 4.6 mmol/kg were found in liver and brain, respectively. After a single injection of a single dose of sodium cyanide at 4.8 mg/kg, cyanide concentrations in liver and brain were 87.8 ± 31.2 mmol/kg and 24.9 ± 4.8 mmol/kg, respectively (Willhite and Smith 1981). With regard to the metabolism of cyanide, it is important to distinguish be- tween low-dose cyanide metabolism, which occurs under circumstances in which cyanide is present in physiologic concentrations, and high-dose cyanide disposition, in which amounts of cyanide are far in excess of those present under normal physiologic conditions. Low-dose cyanide metabolism involves incorpo- ration via vitamin B12-dependent enzymes of cyanide into the C1-metabolite pool from which it can be eliminated as carbon dioxide. Under physiologic con- ditions, the normal capacity of rhodanese to handle cyanide is not overwhelmed, and circulating cyanide remains in metabolic equilibrium with the C1-metabolic pool (DECOS 1995; ATSDR 1997). At high doses of cyanide, the metabolic pathway via the C1-metabolite pool becomes quickly saturated, and detoxification involving enzymatic thiocy- anate formation occurs. The enzyme rhodanese (E.C. 2.8.1.1) catalyzes the transfer of a sulfane sulfur atom from sulfur donors, such as thiosulfate, to cya- nide, which acts as a sulfur acceptor, thus forming thiocyanate (DECOS 1995; ATSDR 1997). The activity of rhodanese is variable between species and tissues but is high in liver and kidney in most species (Ballantyne and Marrs 1987). The quantitative contribution to thiocyanate formation of beta-mercaptopyruvate- cyanide sulfurtransferase (E.C. 2.8.1.2), which is found in blood, liver, and kid- ney and catalyzes the transfer of a sulfur atom from 2-mercaptopyruvate to cya- nide forming pyruvate and thiocyanate, is not known (DECOS 1995). The half- life time for the conversion of cyanide to thiocyanate from a nonlethal dose in humans is between 20 and 60 min (ATSDR 1997). A minor pathway for cyanide detoxification is the formation of 2- aminothiazoline-4-carboxylic acid from cyanide and cystine. This reaction oc- curs spontaneously both in vitro and in vivo and is not enzyme-dependent. The reaction product has been identified in urine of experimental animals and in hu- mans exposed to high concentrations of cyanide (Wilson 1987; Wood and Cooley 1956). Acetone is oxidized in the liver by cytochrome P450 2E1 to acetol. Acetol in turn can be used for gluconeogenesis, that is, biosynthesis of glucose, either

Acetone Cyanohydrin 29 via further oxidation to methylglyoxal in the liver or extrahepatically via reduc- tion to L-1,2-propanediol, which can return to the liver where it is oxidized to L- lactaldehyde and further to L-lactate, which is then incorporated into glucose. Alternatively, L-1,2-propanediol can be degraded to acetate and formate in the liver (Casazza et al. 1984; Kosugi et al. 1986). Data regarding the excretion of acetone cyanohydrin per se are not avail- able. The cyanide metabolic products thiocyanate, cyanocobalamin, and 2- aminothiazole-4-carboxylic acid are excreted into urine. HCN and carbon diox- ide are expired (DECOS 1995; ATSDR 1997). 4.2. Mechanism of Toxicity Acetone cyanohydrin behaves as its molar equivalent in cyanide both in vitro and in vivo. All of the pharmacologic actions of cyanide result from cya- nide’s reversible complex with the ferric (+3) state of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase, also known as ferrocytochrome c–oxygen oxidoreductase. This en- zyme is also known as cytochrome aa3, and it is the terminal oxidase in aerobic metabolism of all animals, plants, yeasts, and some bacteria. This enzyme is a heme-copper lipoprotein, and cytochromes a and a3 are combined in the same large oligomeric protein molecule. Mammalian cytochrome c oxidase contains two molecules of heme A and two copper atoms. This helical protein also con- tains 820 amino acids. The integrity of the disulfide groups to maintain the 30% helix structure is essential to the oxidase mechanism. Cessation of the mito- chondrial electron transport results in inhibition of oxygen utilization and causes hypoxia and cellular destruction. The interaction of cytochrome c oxidase with cytochrome c was reviewed by Lemberg (1969). The reaction proceeds by first-order kinetics with respect to the concentration of cytochrome c (Smith et al. 1979). Once absorbed, cya- nide complexes with many metal ions and interferes with the activities of at least 39 heme zinc, copper, and disulfide enzymes (e.g., catalase and peroxidase) whose activities depend on either metals as cofactors or prosthetic groups (Dixon and Webb 1964). Cyanide also binds to nonhematin metal containing enzymes, like tyrosinase, ascorbic acid oxidase, xanthine oxidase, amino acid oxidase, formic dehydrogenase, and various phosphates. The cyanide concentra- tion required for cytochrome c oxidase inhibition is 26 orders of magnitude less than that required for inhibition of these other enzymes. Thus, it is the critical position of cytochrome c oxidase in aerobic metabolism that makes its inhibition felt earliest, so the effects of HCN on other enzyme systems have scant chance to appear (Rieders 1971). The oxidase-HCN (not CN) (Stannard and Horecker 1948; Gibson and Greenwood 1963) complex is dissociable (Swinyard 1975). Willhite and Smith (1981) measured the inhibition of the oxidation of purified bovine cardiac cytochrome c in vitro by a number of nitriles. In the presence of potassium cyanide (KCN) or acetone cyanohydrin, the reaction was inhibited in a concentration-dependent fashion. The addition of acetone cyano-

30 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels hydrin inhibited the reaction in a manner kinetically similar to the addition of KCN. Since the inhibitory effects of KCN and acetone cyanohydrin were ob- served at pH 6.0 and the pKa of HCN is 9.2, the data indicate that the inhibitory species is the undissociated acid HCN, as suggested previously (Stannard and Horecker 1948; Gibson and Greenwood 1963). 4.3. Structure-Activity Relationships Willhite and Smith (1981) demonstrated that the behavior of acetone cya- nohydrin parallels that of its molar equivalent of cyanide in vivo. For example, the intraperitoneal LD50 (lethal dose with 50% lethality) in mice for acetone cyanohydrin (equivalent to 2.65 mg of cyanide ion per kilogram) is similar to that of sodium cyanide at 2.54 mg of cyanide ion per kilogram; mean time-to- death was 5 min for both compounds. Pretreatment with sodium nitrite or thi- osulfate (standard cyanide antidotes) protected mice against lethal doses of ace- tone cyanohydrin and HCN. The authors also studied the acute toxicity in mice for a series of seven aliphatic nitriles (acetonitrile, propionitrile, acrylonitrile, n- butyronitrile, malononitrile, succinonitrile, and acetone cyanohydrin) and so- dium cyanide. Only the latter two compounds produced death within 5 min. All other nitriles produced death at widely varying intervals from a few minutes to many hours. Pretreatment with the liver toxicant carbon tetrachloride protected mice against death from all nitriles, except acetone cyanohydrin, suggesting that all nitriles examined (except for acetone cyanohydrin) possess little if any acute toxicity in the absence of normal hepatic function and that these nitriles (except acetone cyanohydrin) underwent hepatic metabolism to release cyanide, ac- counting for their acute toxicity. In contrast, acetone cyanohydrin did not require metabolic activation and released its cyanide moiety spontaneously in vivo. Johannsen and Levinskas (1986) undertook a structure-activity compari- son of acetone cyanohydrin, lactonitrile, four mononitriles (acetonitrile, propio- nitrile, n-butyronitrile, and acrylonitrile) and two dinitriles (succinonitrile and adiponitrile). The authors observed that with regard to oral and dermal LD50, as well as repeated administration, acetone cyanohydrin was the most potent com- pound tested. For other nitriles, the time to onset of signs of toxicity in rats was between 50 and 300 min after exposure, and for acetone cyanohydrin ,a rapid onset of signs (within 5 min) before death was found. The authors concluded that the signs of acetone cyanohydrin toxicity resembled those seen after expo- sure to sodium cyanide. 4.4. Other Relevant Information 4.4.1. Effects of Cyanides and Acetone in Humans Since acetone cyanohydrin exerts toxicity through rapid release of cya- nide, it is appropriate to take into consideration relevant studies describing ef-

Acetone Cyanohydrin 31 fects in humans after exposure to cyanide (summarized in NRC 2002). Several studies reporting effects after repeated occupational exposure to cyanides are available; however, accurate empirical exposure data usually were not reported. Bonsall (1984) described the case of a worker who was exposed to HCN during inspecting a tank containing a thin layer of hydrazodiisobutyronitrile. The tank had been washed with water, which resulted in hydrolysis of the nitrile into HCN and acetone. The man collapsed after 3 min, was fitted with a breath- ing apparatus after another 3 min and removed from the tank after 13 min. At this time, the worker was unconscious with imperceptible breathing and dilated pupils and was covered with chemical residue. Immediately after the accident, a concentration of HCN of about 500 mg/m³ (450 ppm) was measured. The victim was administered sodium thiosulfate and was discharged from the hospital 2 weeks later without apparent sequelae. El Ghawabi et al. (1975), compared the symptoms of 36 workers exposed to HCN in three electropating factories in Egypt with a control group; employ- ment ranged between 5 and 17 years. None of the workers in either the exposed or control groups were smokers. Cyanide exposure resulted from a plating bath that contained copper cyanide, sodium cyanide, and sodium carbonate. Concen- trations of cyanide in the breathing zone of the workers ranged from 4.2 to 12.4 ppm (means in the three factories: 6, 8, and 10 ppm). Fifteen-minute air samples were collected in sodium hydroxide and analyzed colorimetrically. Symptoms reported most frequently by exposed workers compared with the referent control group were, in descending order of frequency: headache, weakness, and changes in taste and smell. Lacrimation, vomiting, abdominal colic, precordial pain, sali- vation, and nervous instability were less common. The authors made no attempt to correlate the incidences of these symptoms with concentrations. Although there were no clinical manifestations of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, 20 of the workers had thyroid enlargement to a mild or moderate degree; this condi- tion was accompanied by higher 131I uptake compared with the referent controls. Exposed workers also had significantly higher blood hemoglobin, lymphocyte cell counts, cyanmethemoglobin, and urinary thiocyanate levels than controls. Urinary thiocyanate levels were correlated with cyanide concentration in work- place air. Two workers in the factory with a mean exposure of 10 ppm suffered psychotic episodes; recovery occurred within 36 to 48 h. Although the sample size was small, the study used well-matched controls and included a biologic index of exposure (urinary thiocyanate). The NRC Subcommittee on Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations, in evaluating the El Ghawabi et al. (1975) data, concluded that “8 ppm would likely produce no more than mild CNS ef- fects (e.g., mild headache), which would be acceptable for 1-h exposures” of healthy adults (NRC 2000). Blanc et al. (1985) surveyed and examined 36 former employees of a sil- ver reclaiming facility to determine acute and potential residual adverse health effects resulting from occupational HCN exposure. The study was prompted by a worker fatality from acute cyanide poisoning. The workers had been chroni- cally exposed to airborne cyanide at time-weighted-average (TWA) concentra-

32 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels tions (taken 24 h after the plant had closed down) of at least 15 ppm. The most frequent symptoms included headache, dizziness, nausea or vomiting, and a bit- ter or almond taste, eye irritation, loss of appetite, epistaxis, fatigue, and rash. The most prevalent symptoms (headache, dizziness, nausea or vomiting, and a bitter or almond taste) were consistent with cyanide poisoning. A concentration- response relationship corresponding to high- and low-exposure jobs was demon- strated, but exact breathing zone concentrations were not quantified. Some symptoms exhibiting a dose-response trend occurring 7 or more months after exposure had ceased. Mild abnormalities of vitamin B12, folate, and thyroid function were detected, and those results suggested cyanide and/or thiocyanide involvement. The NRC (2000) pointed out that the 24-h TWA of 15 ppm was measured 1 day after the plant had ceased operation, suggesting that these work- ers may have been exposed to cyanide at more than 15 ppm. Leeser et al. (1990) reported a cross-sectional study of the health of cya- nide-salt production workers. Sixty-three cyanide production workers employed for 1 to 40 years were compared with 100 referent workers from a diphenyl ox- ide plant. Workers were examined before and after a block of six 8-h shifts. All workers had full medical examinations, routine clinical chemistry tests, and blood samples taken for measurement of blood cyanide and carboxyhemoglobin. In addition, circulating levels of vitamin B12 and thyroxin (T4) were measured. Atmospheric cyanide was monitored with static monitors, Draeger pump tests, and personal monitoring. For the personal monitoring, air was drawn through bubblers that contained sodium hydroxide. Cyanide collected in the sodium hy- droxide solution was measured using an anion-selective ion electrode. All re- sults (34 samples) were between 0.01 and 3.6 mg/m³ (0.01 and 3.3 ppm). Geo- metric mean values for eight job categories ranged between 0.03 and 1.05 mg/m³ (0.03 and 0.96 ppm). Values for only one job category (eight personal samples) averaged 0.96 ppm. Results of routine Draeger pump tests (area sam- ples) were between 1 and 3 ppm (measurement method not stated). This in- creased exposure was reflected in an increase in mean blood cyanide level in the workers following a block of six 8-h shifts, and there was an increase of 5.83 µmol during the 6-ppm exposure compared with a decrease of 0.46 µmol across the shift block in the spring. Static monitors on all floors, set to trigger alarms at 10 ppm, failed to sound during the study. Circulating cyanide concentrations in exposed workers, though low, were generally higher than in control workers, and the highest levels were measured in cyanide-exposed nonsmokers compared with the nonsmoking control group (cyanide-exposed nonsmokers, 3.32 µmol; controls, 1.14 µmol; p < 0.001). For ex-smokers, the difference was smaller (cyanide exposed, 2.16 µmol; controls, 1.46 µmol), and for current smokers, the blood cyanide level was higher in the control group (2.94 µmol for cyanide workers who smoked; 3.14 µmol for controls who smoked). The percentage of workers reporting shortness of breath and lack of energy was higher in cyanide workers than in the diphenyl oxide plant workers. These differences were par- tially explained by the greater number of cyanide workers who were shift work- ers. Slightly higher hemoglobin values and lymphocyte counts in the cyanide

Acetone Cyanohydrin 33 workers were not dose-related. Results of clinical and physical examinations and evaluation of medical histories failed to reveal any exposure-related health problems. Compared with cyanide, the acute toxicity of acetone is low (ATSDR 1994). This fact is reflected in comparatively high values for the TLV (Thresh- old Limit Value) (ACGIH 1997) of 500 ppm for 8 h with a 750-ppm STEL (short-term exposure limit), the IDLH (immediately dangerous to life and health concentrations) of 2,500 ppm (NIOSH 1996), and the EEGL (emergency expo- sure guidance levels) of 1,000 ppm for 24 h and 8,500 ppm for 1 h (NRC 1984). Acetone and its metabolic products (Casazza et al. 1984; Kosugi et al. 1986; Gentry et al. 2003) contribute only insignificantly to the toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin. 4.4.2. Lethality of HCN in Animals Only one study was located that evaluated lethality of HCN in rats for an exposure time comparable to that of the 6-h studies of Monsanto (1982b,c, 1986a,b) using acetone cyanohydrin. Five male and five female Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD rats were exposed to HCN at 68 ppm in a stainless steel chamber for 6 h/d for 3 days (Blank 1983). HCN was generated by passing nitrogen over the liquid contained in a 500-mL flask. The concentration in the cage was measured with an infrared analyzer. During the exposures, hypoactivity and quick shallow breathing were observed in all animals. During the first day, three males exhibited anoxia and hypoxia followed by convulsions (one male). One male rat died during the exposure, a second male died during the post-exposure observation period, and a third male was found dead prior to the second day of exposure. Two additional males and all five females exhibited breathing difficulties following the first exposure. No additional mortality was observed following the second and third days of expo- sure; body weights by the third day were below pre-exposure weights. Necropsy of the three dead males revealed cyanosis of the extremities, moderate-to-severe hemorrhage of the lung, lung edema, tracheal edema, blanched appearance of the liver, singular occurrences of blood engorgement of the heart and surround- ing vessels, chromorhinorrhea, urine-filled bladder, and gaseous distension of the gastrointestinal tract. Survivors were sacrificed following the last exposure. Of the seven survivors, three females developed slight-to-moderate pulmonary hemorrhage. 4.4.3. Species Variability Because of the lack of sufficient data, the potential interspecies variability for acute inhalation toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin cannot be assessed directly. However, data on acute lethality after oral administration (Table 1-5) indicate that lethal doses are similar for different species.

34 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels TABLE 1-5 Summary of Oral LD50 Data for Acetone Cyanohydrin Species LD50 (mg/kg) Reference Rat 17 Smyth et al. 1962 Rat 13.3 Shkodich 1966 Rat 17.8 Marhold 1972 Mouse 14 Marhold 1972 Mouse 15 Hamblin 1953, personal commun., as cited in Sunderman and Kincaid 1953 Mouse 2.9 Shkodich 1966 Guinea pig 9 Shkodich 1966 Rabbit 13.5 Shkodich 1966 Likewise, nearly identical LD50 values have been found in rats and mice after parenteral application: An LD50 value of 8.7 mg/kg (95% confidence inter- val [CI], 8-9 mg/kg) (mean time to death, 5 ± 1 min) was found after intraperi- toneal injection in CD-1 male mice (Willhite and Smith 1981), and one of 8.5 mg/kg was found after subcutaneous injection in male albino rats (Magos 1962). For HCN, LC50 values for various species differ by a factor of 2-3 (ATSDR 1997), and an interspecies extrapolation factor of 2 was used for deri- vation of AEGL-3 and -2 values for HCN (NRC 2002). 4.4.4. Intraspecies Variability People at potentially increased risk for toxic effects caused by exposure to acetone cyanohydrin include those with chronic exposure to cyanide (e.g., heavy smokers) or cyanogenic glycosides from edible plants (e.g., cassava or lima beans) and those with an inadequate detoxification of cyanide (reviewed in NRC 2002). The latter condition can result from inadequate dietary intake of vitamin B12 and/or sulfur-containing amino acids as well as from inborn metabolic er- rors, such as the genetic component responsible for Leber’s hereditary optic atrophy, which is possibly associated with a reduction in rhodanese activity, dominantly inherited optic atrophy, and recessively inherited optic atrophy (DECOS 1995). However, for a single acute exposure to high acetone cyano- hydrin concentrations, the interindividual differences are probably not great be- cause the decomposition of acetone cyanohydrin to cyanide is not dependent on metabolism and the cyanide detoxification pathway becomes quickly saturated at higher exposure concentrations. Due to conservatism of the cytochrome c oxidase during evolution, interindividual differences in the affinity of cyanide binding to its target receptor are unlikely to occur.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 35 For HCN, an intraspecies extrapolation factor of 3 has been used for deri- vation of AEGL-3 and -2 values for HCN (NRC 2002). 5. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-1 5.1. Human Data Relevant to AEGL-1 The odor threshold of acetone cyanohydrin has not been firmly estab- lished. Shkodich (1966) published the odor threshold for acetone cyanohydrin in water (0.06 mg/L). However, the odor would necessarily be the consequence of a mixed presentation of the HCN and cyanohydrin concentrations in air. Human data on irritation effects of acetone cyanohydrin are lacking. Since the effects of acetone cyanohydrin are due to the release of cyanide after its rapid decomposition, data on exposure of humans to cyanide are rele- vant. In humans occupationally exposed to cyanide, no adverse effects have been found after exposure to a geometric mean cyanide concentration of 1 ppm (Leeser et al. 1990). At concentrations of 6-10 ppm, there were increased com- plaints of mild headache after repeated occupational exposure (El Ghawabi et al. 1975). 5.2. Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-1 During the first week of repeated 10-ppm 6-h exposure studies in rats, there was no sign of red nasal discharge in one study (Monsanto 1986a). The incidence of nasal discharge was not increased compared with concurrent con- trol groups in two studies (Monsanto 1982b,c), but it was increased compared with the control group in a fourth study (Monsanto 1986b). No other adverse effects were reported in these four studies. 5.3. Derivation of AEGL-1 Human data on acetone cyanohydrin relevant for the derivation of AEGL- 1 are lacking. One study in rats (Monsanto 1986a) reported red nasal discharge (which was interpreted as a sign of local irritation in the upper respiratory tract) in 4 of 20 animals at 29.9 ppm and in 2 of 20 animals at 59.6 ppm, but not in control animals and in animals exposed to 9.2 ppm, during the first week of re- peated 6-h/d exposures. However, red nasal discharge was not consistently seen in any of the other Monsanto studies and, when present, was not always dose- responsive. In addition, control animals varied widely in terms of whether that end point was present or not. In light of the variability of the red nasal discharge in repeat studies, it seemed a poor end point on which to base the AEGL-1. Also, the repeat exposures used in the Monsanto studies were not appropriate for the derivation of AEGL-1 values.

36 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels The pathogenesis of red nasal discharge in rats is not entirely clear. In the case of acetone cyanohydrin, it may be related to local tissue hypoxia leading to vasodilatation and subsequent extravasation of red blood cells, which could ex- plain the lack of histopathologic findings. Red nasal discharge in rats occurs at the plexus antebrachii, which is very prominent in the rat. In the rat, extravasa- tion of red blood cells visible as red nasal discharge is caused easily not only by locally acting chemicals, but also by stress, dry air, or upper respiratory tract infections. The derivation of AEGL-1 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the local and systemic toxic effects of acetone cyanohydrin are due to free cyanide. Once ab- sorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-1 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cya- nohydrin. This procedure is supported by similar values that would be derived on the basis of available acetone cyanohydrin studies in rats. The derivation ba- sis would be an exposure at 9.2 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks, which did not result in red nasal discharge (Monsanto 1986a). Using the default time scal- ing procedure and a total uncertainty factor of 10, AEGL-1 values of 2.1, 2.1, 1.7, 1.1, and 0.69 ppm would be derived for the 10- and 30-min and 1-, 4-, and 8-h periods, respectively. The AEGL-1 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-1 values for HCN (NRC 2002). The values are listed in Table 1-6. Because no definitive reports on the odor threshold of acetone cyano- hydrin were located in the literature (see section 5.1), no level of distinct odor awareness (LOA) was derived. 6. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-2 6.1. Human Data Relevant to AEGL-2 Human exposure data relevant for the derivation of AEGL-2 values are lacking. Because the effects of acetone cyanohydrin are caused by the release of cyanide after rapid decomposition of acetone cyanohydrin, data on exposure of humans to cyanide are relevant. Chronic occupational exposure to cyanide con- centrations of about 6-10 ppm produced mild CNS effects (mild headache) (El Ghawabi et al. 1975); more distinct symptoms were reported for occupational exposures of 15 ppm and higher (Blanc et al. 1985). 6.2. Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-2 Four studies using repeated 6-h inhalation exposures of rats, performed

Acetone Cyanohydrin 37 TABLE 1-6 AEGL-1 Values for Acetone Cyanohydrina AEGL 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h AEGL-1 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm (8.8 mg/m³) (8.8 mg/m³) (7.0 mg/m³) (4.6 mg/m³) (3.5 mg/m³) a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered. according to good laboratory practice, reported signs of irritation at an exposure concentration of about 30 ppm (Monsanto 1982b,c, 1986a,b), such as red nasal discharge and encrustations and perioral wetness and red stain. Red nasal dis- charge was also observed at about 10 ppm in two of the four studies. At higher concentrations of about 60 ppm in one study (Monsanto 1986a), respiratory dis- tress, prostration, and tremors and/or convulsions were observed after the first exposure in 4 of 20 animals, and of these, three animals died. No studies show- ing irreversible, nonlethal effects in animals were available in the literature. 6.3. Derivation of AEGL-2 The derivation of AEGL-2 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equiva- lent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-2 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. This conclu- sion is supported by very similar AEGL-2 values that would be derived on the basis of chemical-specific data: in the Monsanto (1986a) study, repeated expo- sures to 29.9 ppm acetone cyanohydrin for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks resulted in irritation, but not in respiratory distress, which was observed in 4of 20 animals during the first exposure at 60 ppm. Using the default time-scaling procedure and a total uncertainty factor of 10, AEGL-2 values of 6.8, 6.8, 5.4, 3.4, and 2.5 ppm would be derived for the 10- and 30-min and 1-, 4-, and 8-h periods, re- spectively. The AEGL-2 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-2 values for HCN (NRC 2002). The values are listed in Table 1-7. TABLE 1-7 AEGL-2 Values for Acetone Cyanohydrina AEGL 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h AEGL-2 17 ppm 10 ppm 7.1 ppm 3.5 ppm 2.5 ppm (60 mg/m³) (35 mg/m³) (25 mg/m³) (12 mg/m³) (8.8 mg/m³) a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered.

38 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels 7. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-3 7.1. Human Data Relevant to AEGL-3 Human exposure data relevant for the derivation of AEGL-3 values are not available. 7.2. Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-3 Reliable LC50 studies for acetone cyanohydrin performed according to good laboratory practice are not available. Single-exposures killed two of six rats that inhaled 62.5 ppm for 4 h (Smyth et al. 1962). The LC40 was 51.8 ppm for 2 h in rats, and the LC30 was 19.6 ppm for 2 h in mice (Izmerov et al. 1982); however, due to the small number of animals in the study by Smyth et al. (1962), the lack of information on the rodent strain and the number of animals used in the study by Izmerov et al. (1982), and the failure of both studies to re- port experimental details, a thorough evaluation of these data is not possible. The study by Sunderman and Kincaid (1953) used saturated acetone cya- nohydrin vapor that led to death within 1.5 or 10 min. Likewise, Smyth et al. (1962) reported death of rats after 5 min of exposure to saturated vapor concen- trations. Four studies, performed according to good laboratory practice, exposed rats repeatedly to acetone cyanohydrin at about 60 ppm for 6 h/d (Monsanto 1982b,c, 1986a,b). Lethal effects were reported in only one of the studies (Mon- santo 1986a): 3 of 10 males died after the first exposure, none of 10 female rats died, and no further deaths of males were observed in subsequent exposures. No deaths occurred in the other studies that used 15 males and 15 females (Mon- santo 1986b), 24 females (Monsanto 1982c), or 15 males (Monsanto 1982b). In the HCN study by Blank (1983), 3 of 10 rats died after the first expo- sure to at 68 ppm for 6 h. 7.3. Derivation of AEGL-3 The derivation of AEGL-3 values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equiva- lent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-3 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. This conclu- sion is supported by very similar observations of lethal effects in rats: Blank (1983) reported that 3 of 10 rats died after the first exposure to HCN at 68 ppm, and the subsequent two exposures on the following days caused no additional deaths. This finding closely resembles that of Monsanto (1986a) reporting death of 3 of 20 animals after the first exposure to acetone cyanohydrin at 60 ppm (as

Acetone Cyanohydrin 39 discussed in section 3.1.1, the actual exposure concentration on the first day might have been slightly higher than the average 59.6 ppm), and no additional deaths were found in the 19 subsequent exposures. The AEGL-3 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-3 values for HCN (NRC 2002). The values are listed in Table 1-8. 8. SUMMARY OF AEGLs 8.1. AEGL Values and Toxicity End Points The AEGL values for various levels of effects and various time periods are summarized in Table 1-9. They were derived using the following key studies and methods. The derivation of AEGL values was based on the facts that acetone cya- nohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the local and systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. All inhalation data are summarized in Figure 1-1. The data were classified into severity categories chosen to fit into definitions of the AEGL health effects. TABLE 1-8 AEGL-3 Values for Acetone Cyanohydrina AEGL 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h AEGL-3 27 ppm 21 ppm 15 ppm 8.6 ppm 6.6 ppm (95 mg/m³) (74 mg/m³) (53 mg/m³) (30 mg/m³) (23 mg/m³) a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered. TABLE 1-9 Summary of AEGL Values for Acetone Cyanohydrina,b Classification 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h AEGL-1 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm (Nondisabling) (8.8 mg/m³) (8.8 mg/m³) (7.0 mg/m³) (4.6 mg/m³) (3.5 mg/m³) AEGL-2 17 ppm 10 ppm 7.1 ppm 3.5 ppm 2.5 ppm (Disabling) (60 mg/m³) (35 mg/m³) (25 mg/m³) (12 mg/m³) (8.8 mg/m³) AEGL-3 27 ppm 21 ppm 15 ppm 8.6 ppm 6.6 ppm (Lethal) (95 mg/m³) (74 mg/m³) (53 mg/m³) (30 mg/m³) (23 mg/m³) a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered. b Cutaneous absorption may occur; direct skin contact with the liquid should be avoided.

Consistency of Data for Acetone Cyanohydrin 40 with Derived AEGL Values 1000.00 100.00 Human - No effect Human - Discomfort Human - Disabling Animal - No effect Animal - Discomfort Animal - Disabling AEG L-3 Animal - Some Lethality Animal - Lethal 10.00 AEGL Concentration (ppm) AEG L-2 AEG L-1 1.00 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Time (minutes) FIGURE 1-1 Categorical representation of acetone cyanohydrin inhalation data.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 41 The category severity definitions are “no effect,” “discomfort,” “disabling,” “le- thal,” “some lethality” (at an experimental concentration in which some of the animals died and some did not, this label refers to the animals that did not die), and “AEGL.” Note that the AEGL values are designated as triangles without an indication to their level. AEGL-3 values are higher than the AEGL-2 values, and the AEGL-2 values are higher than the AEGL-1 values. 8.2. Comparison with Other Standards and Criteria Standards and guidance levels for workplace and community exposures are listed in Table 1-10. 8.3. Data Adequacy and Research Needs Definitive exposure-response data for acetone cyanohydrin in humans are not available. Data from earlier animal studies were often compromised by un- certain quantitation of exposure atmospheres, small numbers of animals, and poor data presentation. Four more recent repeated inhalation exposure studies in rats sponsored by Monsanto Company utilized accurate and reliable methods for characterizing concentrations. However, repeat exposure studies were consid- ered of limited relevance for the derivation of AEGL values. TABLE 1-10 Extant Standards and Guidelines for Acetone Cyanohydrin Exposure Duration Guideline 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h AEGL-1 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm AEGL-2 17 ppm 10 ppm 7.1 ppm 3.5 ppm 2.5 ppm AEGL-3 27 ppm 21 ppm 15 ppm 8.6 ppm 6.6 ppm WEEL (AIHA)a 5 ppm for 15 min 2 ppm TLV ceiling (ACGIH)b 4.7 ppm as cyanide REL ceiling (NIOSH)c 1 ppm a AHIA WEEL (American Industrial Hygiene Association, workplace environmental exposure level) (AIHA1999) represent workplace exposure concentrations to which, it is estimated, nearly all employees could be repeatedly exposed without adverse effects. WEELs are ex- pressed as time-weighted-average values for different time periods. b ACGIH TLV ceiling (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Thresh- old Limit Value) (ACGIH 1996) is defined as a 15-min TWA exposure concentration, which should not be exceeded at any time during the workday. Because acetone cyanohydrin behaves qualitatively and quantitatively both in vitro and in vivo exactly as does its molar equivalent in free cyanide, the TLV for acetone cyanohydrin is assigned to be identical to that for free HCN. c NIOSH REL ceiling (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, recommended exposure limits) (NIOSH 1978)is defined analogous to the ACGIH TLV ceiling. NIOSH based the value on the assumption that acetone cyanohydrin was approximately 18.3 times as toxic as acetonitrile by inhalation.

42 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels With regard to toxic effects, the similarity between acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concerning both the mechanism of toxic effects and dose-response relationships was considered high enough to apply the AEGL-1, AEGL-2, and AEGL-3 values derived for HCN to acetone cyanohydrin on a part per million basis. In contrast to HCN, appropriate studies are not available for acetone cya- nohydrin in exposed workers for the derivation of AEGL-1 or in well-performed inhalation exposure studies evaluating neurotoxic or lethal effects for the deriva- tion of AEGL-2 and AEGL-3 values. However, the available results of studies in rats are in good agreement with HCN studies. LC50 studies for acetone cyano- hydrin performed according to good laboratory practice would strengthen the derived AEGL-3 values. It Because of the steep dose-response relationship, concentrations of AEGL-2 and AEGL-3 values differ only by a factor of 1.6 to 2.6, which could cause problems in regulatory applications of AEGL values especially when it is considered that uncertainties of measurements and dispersion (plume) calcula- tions can be in the same order of magnitude or even higher. 9. REFERENCES ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 1996. Acetone Cyanohydrin. Supplements to the Sixth Edition Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Govern- mental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH. ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 1997. Acetone. Supplements to the Sixth Edition Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Indus- trial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH. AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association). 1999. The AIHA 1999 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1990. Toxicological Pro- file for Acrylonitrile. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA [online]. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp125-p.pdf [accessed May 19, 2008]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1994. Toxicological Pro- file for Acetone. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA [online]. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp21-p.pdf [accessed May 19, 2008]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1997. Toxicological Pro- file for Cyanide (Update). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA. Ballantyne, B., and T.C. Marrs, eds. 1987. Clinical and Experimental Toxicology of Cya- nides. Bristol, U.K.: Wright.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 43 Blanc, P., M. Hogan, K. Mallin, D. Hryhorczuk, S. Hessl, and B. Bernard. 1985. Cyanide intoxication among silver-reclaiming workers. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 253(3):367- 371. Blank, T.L. 1983. Inhalation Pilot Study of Hydrogen Cyanide Exposure in Sprague- Dawley Rats. Report No. MSL-2985. EPA OTS Submission 88-920007543. Mon- santo Company. Bonsall, J.L. 1984. Survival without sequelae following exposure to 500 mg/m3 of hy- drogen cyanide. Hum. Toxicol. 3(1):57-60. Casazza, J.P., M.E. Felver, and R.L. Veech. 1984. The metabolism of acetone in the rat. J. Biol. Chem. 259(1):231-236. Conn, E.E. 1979. Cyanogenic glycosides. Int. Rev. Biochem. 27:21-43. DECOS (Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Standards). 1995. Acetone Cyano- hydrin: Health Based Recommended Occupational Exposure Limit. Prepared by Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Standards, Health Council, to the Minis- ter for Health, Welfare, and Sports, the Minister and State Secretary for Social Af- fairs and Employment, The Hague: Gezondheidsraad. Dixon, M., and E.C. Webb. 1964. Pp. 337-340 in Enzymes, 2nd Ed. New York: Academic Press. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 1998. Acetone Cyanohydrin. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Haskell Laboratory, Newark, DE. El Ghawabi, S.H., M.A. Gaafar, A.A. El Saharti, S.H. Ahmed, K.K. Malash, and R. Fares. 1975. Chronic cyanide exposure: A clinical radioisotope and laboratory study. Br. J. Ind. Med. 32(3):215-219. Ellington, J.J., F.E. Stancil, and W.D. Payne. 1987. Measurement of Hydrolysis Rate Constants for Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Land Disposal, Vol. 1. Data on 32 Chemicals. EPA 600/3-86/043. NTIS PB87-140349. Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA. Gabor, S., C. Raucher, M. Leoca and R. Geleru. 1962. Experimental studies on the toxic- ity of some chemical substances used in the manufacturing or organic glass (plexi- glass) [in Rumanian]. Igiena 11:27-30. Gentry, P.R., T.R. Covington, H.J. Clewell, and M.E. Anderson. 2003. Application of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for reference dose and reference concentration estimation for acetone. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 66(23):2209- 2225. Gibson, Q.H., and C. Greenwood. 1963. Reactions of cytochrome oxidase with oxygen and carbon monoxide. Biochem. J. 86:541-554. Glaser, R.A., and P.F. O‘Connor. 1985. The analysis of air for acetone cyanohydrin using solid sorbent sampling and gas chromatography. Anal. Lett. 18(2):217-237. Grybat, A., S. Laue, R. Boelts, and K. Fischer. 2003. Experimental Determination of the Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium for the Binary Systems Acetone Cyanohydrine + Water and Acetone Cyanohydrine + Benzene. Laboratory for Thermophysical Properties GmbH, and University of Oldenburg. May 8, 2003. ICI (Imperial Chemical Co.). 1993. Kinetics for the Dissociation of Acetone Cyanohydrin in Water. Imperial Chemical Co., London, UK (as cited in OECD 1997). IUCLID (International Uniform Chemical Information Database). 2000. 2-hydroxy-2- methylpropionitrile (CAS No. 75-86-5). IUCLID Dataset. 2000 CD- room Ed. European Commission, European Chemicals Bureau [online]. Available: http://ecb.jrc.it/iuclid-datasheet/75865.pdf [accessed May 21, 2008].

44 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels Izmerov, N.F., I.V. Sanotsky and K.K. Sidorov. 1982. Toxicometric Parameters of Indus- trial Toxic Chemicals under Single Exposure. Centre of International Projects, GKNT, Moscow. Johannsen, F.R., and G.J. Levinskas. 1986. Relationships between toxicity and structure of aliphatic nitriles. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 7(4):690-697. Kaplita, P.V., and R.P. Smith. 1986. Pathways for the bioactivation of aliphatic nitriles to free cyanide in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 84(3):533-540. Kosugi, K., V. Chandramouli, K. Kumaran, W.C. Schumann, and B.R. Landau. 1986. Determinants in the pathways followed by the carbons of acetone in their conver- sion to glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 261(28):13179-13181. Krefft, S. 1955. Acetoncyanhydrin poisoning in man and animal; Experimental research on percutaneous toxicity of acetoanyhydrin [in German]. Arch. Gewerbepathol. Gewerbehyg. 14(2):110-116. Lang, J., and F. Stintzy. 1960. A case of slow poisoning by hydrocyanic acid caused by cyanhydrin acetone [in French]. Arch. Mal. Prof. 21:652-657. Leeser, J.E., J.A. Tomenson, and D.D. Bryson. 1990. A Cross-Sectional Study of the Health of Cyanide Salt Production Workers. Report No. OHS/R/2. ICI Central Laboratory, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK. Lemberg, M.R. 1969. Cytochrome oxidase. Phys. Rev. 49(1):48-121. Magos, L. 1962. A study of acrylonitrile poisoning in relation to methaemoglobin-CN complex formation. Br. J. Ind. Med. 19(4):283-286. Marhold, J.V. 1972. Sborník Výsledkù Toxikologického Vysetrení Látek a Pripravkù. Praha: Institut pro výchovu vedoucích pracovníku chemického prumyslu. Monsanto. 1982a. Range-Finding Teratology Study in the Rat. Report No. IL-83-094. EPA/OPTS Public File No. 878216399. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO (as cited in IUCLID 2000). Monsanto. 1982b. Male Fertility Study of Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed by Inhalation Route to Acetone Cyanohydrin. Report No. ML-82-144. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO. Monsanto. 1982c. Female Fertility Study of Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed by Inhalation Route to Acetone Cyanohydrin. Report No. ML-82-125. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO. Monsanto. 1983. Teratology Study in Rats. Report No. IL-83-105. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO. EPA/OPTS Public file No. 878216401(as cited in IUCLID 2000). Monsanto. 1986a. One-Month Inhalation Toxicity of Acetone Cyanohydrin in Male and Female Sprague-Dawley Rats with cover letter dated 04-25-86. Report No. BN-81- 178. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO. Monsanto. 1986b. Three-Month Inhalation Toxicity of Acetone Cyanohydrin in Male and Female Sprague-Dawley Rats with cover letter dated 04-25-86. Report No. ML- 82-143. Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 1978. Criteria for a Rec- ommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Nitriles. NIOSH Publication 78- 212. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [online]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/78-212.html [accessed May 20, 2008]. NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). 1985. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM): Method 2506 Acetone Cyanohydrin. U.S. Depart- ment of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (as cited in DECOS 1995).

Acetone Cyanohydrin 45 NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). 1996. Acetone. Docu- mentation for Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health Concentrations (IDLH): NIOSH Chemical Listing and Documentation of Revised IDLH Values [online]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/67641.html [accessed May 23, 2008]. NRC (National Research Council). 1984. Acetone. Pp. 5-25 in Emergency and Continu- ous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Airborne Contaminants, Vol. 1. Wash- ington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Hydrogen cyanide. Pp. 330-365 in Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants, Vol. 4. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC (National Research Council). 2001. Standing Operating Procedures for Developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Chemicals. Washington, DC: Na- tional Academy Press. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Hydrogen cyanide. Pp. 211-276 in Acute Expo- sure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1997. Acetone Cya- nohydrin. OECD Initial Assessment Reports for High Production Volume Chemi- cals, Including Screening Information Data Sets (SIDS), Vol. 4, Part 1. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals. November 1997 [online]. Available: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/Publications/sidsidex/sidsidex.htm [ac- cessed May 23, 2008]. Rieders, F. 1971. Noxious gases and vapors. I. Carbon monoxide, cyanides, methemo- globin, and sulfhemoglobin. Pp. 1180-1205 in Drill’s Pharmacology in Medicine, 4th Ed, J. DiPalma, ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shkodich, P.E. 1966. Experimental determination of the maximum permissible concen- tration of acetone cyanohydrin in water basins [in Russian]. Gig. Sanit. 31(6):335- 341. Singh, H.B., N. Wasi, and M.C. Mehra. 1986. Detection and determination of cyanide - a review. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 26(2):115-136. Smith, L., H.C. Davies, and M.E. Nava. 1979. Kinetics of reaction of cytochrome c with cytochrome c oxidase. Pp. 293-304 in Cytochrome Oxidase, Developments in Bio- chemistry, Vol. 5, T.E. King, Y. Orii, B. Chance, and K. Okunuki, eds. Amster- dam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press. Smyth, H.F., C.P. Carpenter, C.S. Weil, U.C. Pozzani, and J.A. Striegel. 1962. Range- finding toxicity data: List VI. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 23:95-107. Stannard, J.N., and B.L. Horecker. 1948. The in vitro inhibition of cytochrome oxidase by azide and cyanide. J. Biol. Chem. 172(2):599-608. Stewart, T.D., and B.J. Fontana. 1940. Effect of solvation upon the dissociation of ace- tone cyanohydrin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 67(12):3281-3285. Sunderman, F.W., and J.F. Kincaid. 1953. Toxicity studies of acetone cyanohydrin and ethylene cyanohydrin. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med. 8(4):371-376. Swinyard, E.A. 1975. Noxious gases and vapors: Carbon monoxide, hydrocyanic acid, benzene, gasoline, kerosene, carbon tetrachloride, and miscellaneous organic sol- vents. Pp. 900-911 in The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th Ed, L.S. Goodman, and A. Gilman, eds. New York: Macmillan. Thiess, A.M., and W. Hey. 1969. On the toxicity of isobutyronitrile and alpha- hydroxyisobutyronitrile (acetone cyanohydrin). Demonstration on 2 cases of poi- soning [in German]. Arch. Toxikol. 24(4):271-282.

46 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels Willhite, C.C., and R.P. Smith. 1981. The role of cyanide liberation in the acute toxicity of aliphatic nitrieles. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 59(3):589-602. Wilson, J. 1987. Cyanide in human disease. Pp. 292-311 in Clinical and Experimental Toxicology of Cyanides, B. Ballantyne, and T.C. Marrs, eds. Bristol, UK: Wright. Wood, J.L., and S.L. Cooley. 1956. Detoxication of cyanide by cystine. J. Biol. Chem. 218(1):449-457. Zeller, H., H.T. Hofmann, A.M. Thiess, and W. Hey. 1969. Toxicity of nitriles (results of animal experiments and 15 years of experience in industrial medicine) [in Ger- man]. Zentralbl. Arbeitsmed. 19(8):225-238.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 47 APPENDIX A DERIVATION OF AEGL VALUES FOR ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN AEGL-1 VALUESa 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm Reference: The AEGL-1 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-1 values for HCN. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Hydrogen cyanide. Pp. 211-276 in Acute Expo- sure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Na- tional Academy Press,. Test Species/Strain/Number: Not applicable. Exposure Route/Concentrations/Durations: Not applicable. Effects: Not applicable. End Point/Concentration/Rationale: Human data on acetone cyanohydrin relevant for the derivation of AEGL-1 are lacking. One study in rats (Monsanto 1986a) reported red nasal discharge (which was interpreted as a sign of local irritation in the upper respiratory tract) in 4/20 animals at 29.9 ppm and in 2/20 animals at 59.6 ppm, but not in control animals and in animals exposed at 9.2 ppm during the first week of repeated 6-h/d exposures. However, red nasal discharge was not consistently seen in any of the other Monsanto (1982b,c, 1986b) studies and, when present, was not always dose-responsive. In addition, control animals varied widely in terms of whether that end point was present. In light of the variability of the red nasal discharge in repeat studies, it seemed a poor end point on which to base the AEGL-1. Also, the repeat exposures used in the Monsanto studies were not appropriate for the derivation of AEGL-1 values. The pathogenesis of red nasal discharge in rats is not entirely clear. In the case of acetone cyanohydrin, it may be related to local tissue hypoxia leading to vasodilatation and subsequent extravasation of red blood cells, which could explain the lack of histopathologic findings. Red nasal discharge in rats occurs at the plexus antebrachii, which is very prominent in the rat. In the rat, extravasation of red blood cells visible as red nasal discharge is caused easily not only by locally acting chemicals but also by stress, dry air, or upper respiratory tract infections. The derivation of AEGL-1 values was based on the facts that acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-1 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. Uncertainty Factors/Rationale: Not applicable. Time Scaling: Not applicable. (Continued)

48 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels AEGL-1 VALUES Continued 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h 2.5 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.0 ppm 1.3 ppm 1.0 ppm Modifying Factor: Not applicable. Animal to Human Dosimetric Adjustment: Not applicable. Data Quality and Support for AEGLs: Similar values would be derived on the basis of available acetone cyanohydrin studies in rats (derivation basis would be an exposure of 9.2 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks that did not result in red nasal discharge [Monsanto 1986a]) using a total uncertainty factor of 10. a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered. AEGL-2 VALUESa 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h 17 ppm 10 ppm 7.1 ppm 3.5 ppm 2.5 ppm Reference: The AEGL-2 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-2 values for HCN. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Hydrogen cyanide. Pp. 211-276 in Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 2. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Test Species/Strain/Sex/Number: Not applicable. Exposure Route/Concentrations/Durations: Not applicable. Effects: Not applicable. End Point/Concentration/Rationale: The derivation of AEGL-2 values was based on the facts that acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-2 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. Uncertainty Factors/Rationale: Not applicable. Modifying Factor: Not applicable. Animal to Human Dosimetric Adjustment: Not applicable. Time Scaling: Not applicable. Data Quality and Support for AEGLs: Very similar values would be derived on the basis of available acetone cyanohydrin studies in rats (derivation basis would be an exposure of 29.9 ppm for 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 4 weeks that caused red nasal discharge as a sign of irritation, and the next higher concentration produced respiratory distress, prostration, convulsions, and tremors [Monsanto 1986a]) using a total uncertainty factor of 10. a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered.

Acetone Cyanohydrin 49 AEGL-3 VALUESa 10 min 30 min 1h 4h 8h 27 ppm 21 ppm 15 ppm 8.6 ppm 6.6 ppm Reference: The AEGL-3 values for acetone cyanohydrin are set at the same values (on a ppm basis) as the AEGL-3 values for HCN. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Hydrogen cyanide. Pp. 211-276 in Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 2. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Test Species/Strain/Sex/Number: Not applicable. Exposure Route/Concentrations/Durations: Not applicable. Effects: Not applicable. End Point/Concentration/Rationale: The derivation of AEGL-3 values was based upon the facts that acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously to HCN and acetone and that the systemic toxicity of acetone cyanohydrin is due to free cyanide. Once absorbed, a dose of acetone cyanohydrin behaves in a manner identical to that of its molar equivalent in absorbed free cyanide. It is appropriate to apply the AEGL-3 values (on a ppm basis) derived for HCN (NRC 2002) to acetone cyanohydrin. Uncertainty Factors/Rationale: Not applicable. Modifying Factor: Not applicable. Animal to Human Dosimetric Adjustment: Not applicable. Time Scaling: Not applicable. Data Quality and Support for the AEGLs: Support comes from the close similarity of acetone cyanohydrin and HCN regarding death in rats: Blank (1983) reported that 3 of 10 rats died after the first exposure to HCN at 68 ppm, but the subsequent two exposures on the following days caused no additional deaths. This finding closely resembles that of Monsanto (1986a) reporting death of 3 of 20 animals after the first exposure to acetone cyanohydrin at 60 ppm (the actual exposure concentration on the first day might have been slightly higher than the average 59.6 ppm), and no additional deaths were found in the 19 subsequent exposures. a Acetone cyanohydrin decomposes spontaneously in the presence of water to yield HCN and acetone. Therefore, both acetone cyanohydrin and HCN concentrations should be considered.

Next: 2 Carbon Disulfide »
Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 7 Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $72.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This book is the seventh volume in the series Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, and includes AEGLs for acetone cyanohydrin, carbon disulfide, monochloroacetic acid, and phenol.

At the request of the Department of Defense, the National Research Council has reviewed the relevant scientific literature compiled by an expert panel and established Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 12 new chemicals. AEGLs represent exposure levels below which adverse health effects are not likely to occur and are useful in responding to emergencies such as accidental or intentional chemical releases in the community, the workplace, transportation, the military, and for the remediation of contaminated sites.

Three AEGLs are approved for each chemical, representing exposure levels that result in: 1) notable but reversible discomfort; 2) long-lasting health effects; and 3) life-threatening health impacts.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!