services, and opportunities for improvement. Used appropriately, it will facilitate the greater accountability this IOM committee recommends (see Chapter 6).
To assess the health of the American people and overall health system performance accurately, the department needs current data from the nation’s health system. To facilitate collection of these data, the department should actively promote the universal adoption of electronic information capabilities—including health information exchange and electronic medical, personal health records—for administrative and clinical purposes.
Antos, J., and A. Rivlin. 2007. Slowing the growth of health spending: We need mixed strategies, and we need to start now. In Opportunity 08: Independent ideas for America’s next president. Edited by M. O’Hanlon. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Pp. 303-320.
Balas, E., and S. Boren. 2000. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In Yearbook of medical informatics. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine. Pp. 65-70.
CBO (Congressional Budget Office). 2007. Research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments: Issues and options for an expanded federal role. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
comSource. 2008. Online health information category grows at rate four times faster than total Internet. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2436 (accessed November 17, 2008).
Diamond, C. C., and C. Shirky. 2008. Health information technology: A few years of magical thinking? Health Affairs 27(5):w383-w390.
Etheredge, L. 2007. A rapid-learning health system. Health Affairs 26:w107-w118.
Hing, E. S., C. W. Burt, and D. A. Woodwell. 2007. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.