National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Venture Funding and the NIH SBIR Program (2009)
National Research Council (NRC)

Citation Manager

. "Front Matter." Venture Funding and the NIH SBIR Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
XIV
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Venture Funding and the NIH SBIR Program

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL REVIEW

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academies’ Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Richard Bendis, National Association of Seed and Venture Funds; Douglas Doerfler, Maxcyte Inc.; David Goldston, Harvard University; Heidi Jacobus, Cybernet Systems; Anu Mittal, United States Government Accountability Office; Carol Nacy, Sequella, Inc.; Michael Rodemeyer, University of Virginia; Donald Siegel, University of Albany; Michael Squillante, Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc.; and Judith Tanur, Stony Brook University.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Robert White, Carnegie Mellon University. Appointed by the National Academies, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.


Jacques S. Gansler

Charles W. Wessner

Page
XIV