National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks (2009)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "Attachment C REFERENCES." Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
19
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks

VT. January 24, 1997 [online]. Available: http://heartland.temp.siteexecutive.com/pdf/23157i.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008].

Long, J., and B. Fischhoff. 2000. Setting risk priorities: A formal model. Risk Anal. 20(3):339-352.

Minard, R.A. 1996. Comparative risk assessment and the States: History, politics and results. Pp. 23-62 in Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities, J.C. Davies, ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Morgan, K.M., M.L. DeKay, and P.S. Fischbeck. 1999. A multi-attribute approach to risk prioritization. Risk Policy Report 6(6):38-40.

Morgan, M.G., H.K. Florig, M.L. DeKay, and P. Fischbeck. 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Anal. 20(1):49-58.

Morgan, K.M., M.L. DeKay, P.S. Fischbeck, M.G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and H.K. Florig. 2001. A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): Evaluation of validity and agreement among managers. Risk Anal. 21(5):923-937.

Morgan, M.G., B. Fischhoff, L. Lave, and P. Fischbeck. 1996. A proposal for ranking risks within federal agencies. Pp. 111-148 in Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities, J.C. Davies, ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Morgan, M.G., H.K. Florig, M.L. DeKay, and P. Fischbeck. 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Anal. 20(1):49-58.

Murray, C.J.L., and A.D. Lopez, eds. 1996. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

OGC (Office of Government Commerce). 2008. Management of Risk (M_o_R). Office of Government Commerce, HM Treasury, London, UK [online]. Available: http://www.ogc.gov.uk/guidance_management_of_risk_4441.asp [accessed Dec. 2, 2008].

Palmgren, C.R., M.L. DeKay, P.S. Fischbeck, B. Fischhoff, and M.G. Morgan. 2000. Evaluating a Risk-Ranking Methodology. Society of Risk Analysis Annual Meeting Applications of Risk Analysis in Industry and Government, December 3-6, 2000, Washington, DC.

UNC. 2008. UNC School of Public Health to help UAE assess environmental health risks. UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. School of Public Health News: June 9, 2008 [online]. Available: http://www.sph.unc.edu/school_of_public_health_news/unc_school_of_public_health_to_help_uae_assess_environmental_health_risks_7546_1957.html [accessed Dec. 2, 2008].

USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 2008. Risk-Informed Decision Framework Appendix, Draft. Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Technical Report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District, Mississippi Valley Division. February 2008 [online]. Available: http://lacpr.usace.army.mil/\Report\Draft Appendices\Risk Informed Decision Framework Appendix.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008].

WHO (World Health Organization). 2008. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. Geneva: World Health Organization [online]. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf [accessed Jan. 9, 2009].

Willis, H.H., M.L. DeKay, M.G. Morgan, H.K. Florig, and P.S. Fischbeck. 2004. Ecological risk ranking: Development and evaluation of a method for improving public participation in environmental decision making. Risk Anal. 24(2):363-378.

Willis, H.H., M.L. DeKay, B. Fischhoff, and M.G. Morgan. 2005. Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions. Risk Anal. 25(2):405-428.

Page
19