Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles Envisioning the 2020 Census Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges Other Related Titles Experimentation and Testing Plans for the 2010 Census: Letter Report (2009) Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "REFERENCES." Experimentation and Testing Plans for the 2010 Census: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. Please select a format: Page 12   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore Page 12 Letter Report (1-11) REFERENCES (12-12) PANEL ON THE DESIGN OF THE 2010 CENSUS PROGRAM OF EVALUATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS (13-13)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 12
REFERENCES Bentley, M., and J. G. Tancredo (2005). “Census 2000 Nonresponse Follow-up: Discrepancies in Enumerator Assigned Housing Unit Status,” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Hill, J. M., and J. D. Machowski (2003, September 29). Master Trace Sample. Census 2000 Evaluation B.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. National Research Council (2004). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F King, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2006). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Residence Rules in the Decennial Census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, Daniel L. Cork and Paul R. Voss, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2008). Experimentation and Evaluation Plans for the 2010 Census: Interim Report. Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Lawrence D. Brown, Michael L. Cohen, and Daniel L. Cork, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Tancredo, J. G., and M. Bentley (2005). “Determining the Effectiveness of Multiple Nonresponse Follow-up Contact Attempts on Response and Data Quality.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. West, K. K., J. G. Robinson, and M. Bentley (2005). “Did Proxy Respondents Cause Age Heaping in the Census 2000?” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.   12