National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$24.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments (2010)
Center for Education (CFE)
Board on Science Education (BOSE)

Citation Manager

Fenichel, Marilyn, Schweingruber, Heidi A.. "6 Assessing Learning Outcomes." Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
110
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments

tors can express in words or pictures that illustrate what has been learned during, immediately after, or long after a given experience.

  • Engagement. Similar to Strand 1 (sparking interest and excitement), this impact focuses on learners’ engagement and interest in science, including the emotions evoked by the experience. These emotions can range from excitement and delight to negative feelings, such as anger or sadness.

  • Attitude. This impact refers to a change in worldview or an increase in empathy as a result of an experience in an informal setting. Changes in attitude toward science, math, engineering, or technology are connected to Strand 6.

  • Behavior. This impact refers to projects whose purpose is to change visitors’ behaviors over the long term. Often these changes are sought after experiencing environmental or conservation projects. This category does not have a direct equivalent within the strands.

  • Skills. Similar to Strand 3 (engaging in scientific reasoning) and Strand 5 (using the tools and language of science), this impact focuses on the skills of scientific inquiry, such as observing, asking questions, predicting, testing predictions through experimentation, collecting data, and interpreting them.

The framework also allows for other than these five predetermined categories, thus recognizing that informal science settings may influence visitors, audiences, or participants in many different and important ways.

“Without a common framework specifying outcomes and approaches, it is difficult to show gains in learning that occur across experiences and/or across time.”

Page
110