¹Tisdal, C. (2004). Going APE (Active Prolonged Exploration) at the Exploratorium. Phase 2 Summative Evaluation. Available: http: http://www.informalscience.org/evaluation/show/67 [accessed October 2008].

²Korn, R. (2006). Search for Life: Summative Evaluation. New York: New York Hall of Science. Available: http://www.informalscience.org/evaluations/report_151.pdf [accessed October 2008].

³National Research Council. (2009). Introduction. Chapters 5 and 8 in Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A.W. Shouse, and M.A. Feder (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

⁴Crowley, K., and Jacobs, M. (2002). Islands of expertise and the development of family scientific literacy. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations in Museums. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reeve, S., and Bell, P. (in press). Children’s self-documentation and understanding of the concepts “healthy” and “unhealthy.” International Journal of Science Education.

⁵National Research Council. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

⁶Allen, S. (1997). Using scientific inquiry activities in exhibit explanations. Science Education, 81(6), 715-734.

Borun, M., and Miller, M. (1980). What’s in a Name? A Study of the Effectiveness of Explanatory Labels in a Science Museum. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Science Museum.

Peart, B. (1984). Impact of exhibit type on knowledge gain, attitudes, and behavior. Curator, 27(3), 220-227.

⁷Guichard, H. (1995). Designing tools to develop the conception of learners. International Journal of Science Education, 17(2), 243-253.

⁸Randol, S.M. (2005). The Nature of Inquiry in Science Centers: Describing and Assessing Inquiry at Exhibits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

⁹Koran, J.J., Koran, M.L., and Longino, S.J. (1986). The relationship of age, sex, attraction, and holding power with two types of science exhibits. Curator, 29(3), 227-235.

¹⁰Goldowsky, N. (2002). Lessons from Life: Learning from Exhibits, Animals and Interaction in a Museum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UMI#3055856, Harvard University.

¹¹Allen, S., and Gutwill, J. (2004). Designing science museum exhibits with multiple interactive features: Five common pitfalls. Curator, 47(2), 199-212.

¹²Korn, R. (2003). The Science Museum of Minnesota: Cell Lab Summative Evaluation. Available: http://www.informalscience.org/evaluations/report_174.pdf [accessed February 2010]. Interviews with Kirsten Ellenbogen and Laurie Fink were also part of the research for this case study.