National Academies Press: OpenBook

Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts (2009)

Chapter: Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply

« Previous: Appendix G: Life-Cycle Inputs for Production of Biomass
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

H
Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply

The tables in this appendix present the background information and assumptions that were used in the panel’s economic assessments and greenhouse gas emission analyses. They include comparisons of published and updated costs of harvest and maintenance (Table H.1), nutrient replacement (Table H.2), transportation for delivery (Tables H.3 and H.4), storage (Table H.5), and establishment and seeding (Table H.6) for different cellulosic feedstocks. Estimates of opportunity costs for cellulosic feedstocks are presented (Table H.7). The published yield values from which current and future projections were computed (Table H.8), and carbon inputs for feedstock production (Table H.9) and biomass refining (Table H.10) are also included.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.1 Estimated Costs of Harvest and Maintenance for Cellulosic Feedstocks

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Cost per Ton (cited $)

Cost per Ton (2007$)

Reference

Corn stover

Baling, stacking, grinding

26

45

Hess et al. (2007)

Corn stover

Collection

31–36

66–77

McAloon et al. (2000)

Corn stover

Collection

35–46

64–84

McAloon et al. (2000)

Corn stover

Collection

17.70

17.70

R. Perlack, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, presentation to the committee on November 19, 2007

Corn stover

Up to storage

20–21

36–39

Sokhansanj and Turhollow (2002)

Corn stover

 

28

36

Suzuki (2006)

Corn stover

Baling, staging

26

47

Aden et al. (2002)

Corn stover

Harvest

14

14

Edwards (2007)

Switchgrass

Collection

12–22

16–28

Kumar and Sokhansanj (2007)

Switchgrass

Harvest

32

32

Duffy (2007)

Switchgrass

Harvest

35

58

Khanna et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

Harvest, maintenance, establishment

123.5/acre

210/acre

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Switchgrass

Harvest

15

26

Perrin et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

Harvest

33

54

Khanna et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

Harvest, maintenance, establishment

301/acre

512/acre

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Nonspecific

 

10–30

15–45

Mapemba et al. (2007)

Nonspecific

 

23

38

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Note: Harvest and maintenance costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural fuel, machinery, labor prices from 1999 to 2007 (USSA-NASS, 2007a,b).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.2 Estimated Costs of Nutrient Replacement for Cellulosic Feedstocks

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Cost per Ton (cited $)

Cost per Ton (2007$)

Reference

Corn stover

 

10.2

14.1

Hoskinson et al. (2007)

Corn stover

 

4.6

8.4

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Corn stover

 

7

14.4

Aden et al. (2002)

Corn stover

 

4.2

4.2

Petrolia (2008)

Corn stover

 

10

21

Perlack and Turhollow (2003)

Corn stover

Whole-plant harvest

9.7

13.3

Karlen and Birrell (Unpublished)

Corn stover

Cob, top 50% harvest

9.5

13.1

Karlen and Birrell (Unpublished)

Corn stover

Bottom 50% harvest

10.1

13.9

Karlen and Birrell (Unpublished)

Switchgrass

 

6.7

12.1

Perrin et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

 

10.8

19.77

Khanna et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

 

2.5

4.6

Khanna et al. (2008)

Note: Nutrient and replacement costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural-fertilizer prices from 1999 to 2007 (USDA-NASS, 2007a,b).

TABLE H.3 Estimated Distance for Delivery of Cellulosic Feedstocks

Distance (miles)

Type

Reference

46–134

Round-trip

Mapemba et al. (2007)

22–62

One-way

Perlack and Turhollow (2003)

22–61

One-way

Perlack and Turhollow (2002)

50

Round-trip

Khanna et al. (2008)

50

Max one-way

English et al. (2006)

50

One-way

Vadas et al. (2008)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.4 Estimated Costs of Transportation for Delivery of Cellulosic Feedstocks

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Cost per Ton (cited $)

Cost per Ton (2007$)

Reference

Corn stover

Per ton

8.85

12.5

English et al. (2006)

Corn stover

Per ton

10.25

27

Hess et al. (2007)

Corn stover

DVCa

0.15

0.35

Kaylen et al. (2000)

Corn stover

Max DVC for positive NPV

0.28

0.66

Kaylen et al. (2000)

Corn stover

Per ton

10.8

10.8

Perlack (2007)

Corn stover

Per ton

13

31

Aden et al. (2002)

Corn stover

Per ton

4.2–10.5

11–27.7

Perlack and Turhollow (2002)

Corn stover

DVC

0.08–0.29

0.17–0.63

Kumar et al. (2005)

 

DFCb

4.5

9.8

 

 

DFC range

0–6

0–13.3

 

Corn stover

DVC

0.18

0.32

Searcy et al. (2007)

 

DFC

4

7.3

 

Corn stover

DVC

0.16

0.38

Kumar et al. (2003)

 

DFC

3.6

8.6

 

Corn stover

DVC

 

 

Petrolia (2008)

 

0-25 miles

0.13–0.23

0.13–0.23

 

 

25-100 miles

0.10–0.19

0.10–0.19

 

 

>100 miles

0.09–0.16

0.09–0.16

 

 

DFC square bales

1.70

1.70

 

 

DFC round bales

3.10

3.10

 

Corn stover

Per ton

10.9

13.8

Vadas et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

Per ton

14.75

14.75

Duffy (2007)

Switchgrass

Per ton

19.2–23

27–32.4

Kumar and Sokhansanj (2007)

Switchgrass

Per ton

13

28

Perrin et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

Per ton

10.9

13.8

Vadas et al. (2008)

Switchgrass or Miscanthus

Per ton for 50 miles

7.9

17.1

Khanna et al. (2008)

Nonspecific

Per ton

7.4–19.3

13.7–35.6

Mapemba et al. (2007)

Nonspecific

Per ton

14.5

31.5

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Woody biomass

Per ton

 

11–22

Summit Ridge Investments (2007)

Note: Transportation costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural-fuel prices from 1999 to 2007 (USDA-NASS, 2007a,b).

aDVC, distance variable cost, per ton per mile.

bDFC, distance fixed cost per ton.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.5 Estimated Storage Costs for Cellulosic Feedstocks

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Cost per Ton (cited $)

Cost per Ton (2007$)

Reference

Corn stover

 

4.44

5.64

Hess et al. (2007)

Corn stover

Round bales

6.82

6.82

Petrolia (2008)

 

Square bales

12.93

12.93

 

Switchgrass

 

16.67

16.67

Duffy (2007)

Switchgrass

 

4.14

5.18

Khanna et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

 

4.40

5.50

Khanna et al. (2008)

Nonspecific

 

2

2.18

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Note: Storage costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural-building material prices from 1999 to 2007 (USDA-NASS, 2007a,b).

TABLE H.6 Estimated Costs of Establishment and Seeding for Cellulosic Feedstocks

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Land Rent Included

Cost per Acre (cited $)

Cost per Acre (2007$)

Reference

Switchgrass

 

Yes

200

200

Duffy (2007)

Switchgrass

 

No

25.76

46

Perrin et al. (2008)

 

Yes

85.46

153

Switchgrass

PVa per ton

No

7.21/ton

12.6/ton

Khanna et al. (2008)

10-year PV per acre

 

142.3

249

Amortized

 

 

 

4% over 10 years

 

17.3

30.25

8% over 10 years

 

20.7

36.25

Switchgrass

 

Yes

72.5–110

88.5–134

Vadas et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

PV per ton

No

2.29/ton

4/ton

Khanna et al. (2008)

20-year PV per acre

 

261

457

Amortized

 

 

 

4% over 20 years

 

19

33.2

8% over 20 years

 

26.20

45.87

Miscanthus

Total

No

1206–2413

 

Lewandowski (2003)

Amortized

 

 

 

4% over 20 years

 

88–175

176–350

8% over 20 years

 

121–242

242–484

Note: Establishment and seeding costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural fuel and seed prices from 1999 to 2007 (USDA-NASS, 2007a,b).

aPV denotes present value.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.7 Estimated Opportunity Costs for Cellulosic Feedstocks (Net Returns Forgone by Producer from Not Using Cropland to Produce Next Best Crop or Product)

Type of Feedstock

Type of Cost

Cost per Acre (cited $)

Cost per Acre (2007$)

Reference

Corn stover

Feed value

59.5/ton

59.5/ton

Edwards (2007)

 

2.4 tons/acre

142.8

142.8

 

Corn stover

Lost profits

22–58

22–58

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Switchgrass

Lost profits

78–231

78–231

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Switchgrass or Miscanthus

Lost profits

78

76

Khanna et al. (2008)

Miscanthus

Lost profits

78–231

78–231

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Nonspecific

Lost CRPa payments if harvest every year

35

36

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Nonspecific

Lost CRP if harvest once every 3 years

10.1

10.4

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Nonspecific

Non-CRP land crops

10/ton

10.3/ton

Mapemba et al. (2008)

Nonspecific

 

78

76

Khanna et al. (2008)

Woody biomass

Alternative use

 

0–25

Summit Ridge Investments (2007)

Note: Opportunity costs were updated by using USDA-NASS agricultural-land rent prices from 1999 to 2007 (USDA-NASS, 2007a,b).

aConservation Reserve Program.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.8 Yield Values and Ranges for Different Bioenergy Feedstocks Reported in Literature

Biomass Type

Assumptions

Estimated Yield (tons/acre)

Reference

Corn stover

Soil tolerance

2.02

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Corn stover

 

2.4

Edwards (2007)

Corn stover

2000–2005 mean yields for Wisconsin

2.31–3

Vadas et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

Iowa, Illinois field trials

2.58

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Switchgrass

 

4

Duffy (2007)

Switchgrass

Farm-scale (northern South Dakota to southern Nebraska)

2.23 (5-year average) (Range, 1.7–2.7)

Perrin et al. (2008)

3.12 (10-year average) (Range, 2.6–3.5)

Switchgrass

 

3.8

Khanna et al. (2008)

19.74 (10-year PV)

Switchgrass

Nitrogen level

4–5.8

Vadas et al. (2008)

Switchgrass

Research blocks

7.14 (average)

Lewandowski et al. (2003)

9.8 (best)

Switchgrass

 

3.6–8.9 (previous)

Shinners et al. (2006)

Plot trials

2.3–4 (own)

Switchgrass

Plot trials

6.33

Fike et al. (2006)

4.64–8.5

Switchgrass

Field trials

 

Berdahl et al. (2005)

Mean

1.12–4.1

Strains:

 

Dacotah

1.11–4.22

ND3743

0.91–3.92

Summer

1.18–4.38

Sunburst

1.43–5.57

Trailblazer

1.15–4.88

Shawnee

1.06–4.5

OK NU-2

0.89–4.18

Cave-in-Rock

0.97–4.27

Switchgrass

Plot trials

 

Vogel et al. (2002)

Iowa

5.2–5.6

Nebraska

4.7–5

Switchgrass

Peer-reviewed articles

4.46

Heaton et al. (2004a)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

Biomass Type

Assumptions

Estimated Yield (tons/acre)

Reference

Switchgrass

Farm trials

 

 

Strains:

 

Alamo (1 cut)

5.4–8.5

Kanlow (1 cut)

5.2–6.9

Cave-in-rock (2 cut)

6–8.3

Switchgrass

U.S. average

4.2

McLaughlin et al. (2002)

Grasses

County-scale in Pacific Northwest

3.4–4.1 (perennial ryegrass)

Banowetz et al. (2008)

4.13–6.2 (tall fescue)

2.2–3.36 (creeping red fescue)

Miscanthus

Simulated

8.9

Khanna and Dhungana (2007)

Miscanthus

 

14.5 average

Khanna et al. (2008)

12–17 range

114.58 (20-year PV)

Miscanthus

Field experiment

5.71 (14-year)

Christian et al. (2008)

3.43–11.73 (3-year)

Miscanthus

 

4.5–13.4

Lewandowski et al. (2003)

Miscanthus

Projection

13.36 (mean)

Heaton et al. (2004b)

10.93–17.81

Miscanthus

Peer-reviewed articles

9.8

Heaton et al. (2004a)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.9 Carbon Inputs to Biomass Agricultural Production

Source of Input (kg CO2 eq/ha)a

Corn Ethanol

Cellulosic (Switchgrass)

Nitrogen-fertilizer emissions

1638

547

Phosphorus

102

3.4

Potassium

70

2.4

Lime

228

Herbicide

69

10.4

Insecticide

5.4

Seed

Transport emissions

39

3

Gasoline

114

Diesel

248

341

Natural gas

46

Liquefied petroleum gas

61

Electricity

56

42

Energy used in irrigation

4

Labor transportation

Farm machinery

21

21

CO2 from land-use change (kg/ha)

Total from agricultural production

2703

971

Conversion per acre (0.405 ha/acre, 2.24 lb/kg)

2452 lb CO2 eq/ac

881 lb CO2 eq/ac

Conversion per ton (assume 4 tons/acre)

220 lb CO2 eq/ton

aUnless noted otherwise.

Source: Farrell et al., 2006.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

TABLE H.10 Carbon Inputs to Biomass Refining, Including Transportation of Biomass

Source of Input (g CO2 eq/L)a

Corn Ethanol

Cellulosic

Transport of feedstock to biorefinery

49

51

Primary energy

Diesel

5

Coal

885

Natural gas

365

Electricity

Biomass

Capital (plant, equipment)

8.8

29

Process water

25

19

Effluent restoration (BOD at PWTPsb)

20

20

Transportation of chemicals to plant

Total biorefinery phase

1,353

124

Coproduct credits

525

106

Total biorefinery phase accounting for coproduct

828 g CO2 eq/L

18 g CO2 eq/L

Conversions:

 

 

Initial value

 

 

[0.4/0.4]/0.38 L/kg

828 g CO2 eq/L

18 g CO2 eq/L

[8,746/8,389]/13,450 kg/ha

~331.2 g CO2 eq/kg

~6.84 g CO2 eq/kg

0.405 ha/acre

~2,896,675 g CO2 eq/ha

~91,998 g CO2 eq/ha

0.001 kg/g

~1,173,153 g CO2 eq/ac

~37,259 g CO2 eq/ac

 

~1,173 kg CO2e/ac

~37.3 kg CO2 eq/ac

TOTAL (agriculture phase + biorefinery)

4,307 lb CO2 eq/ac

964 lb CO2 eq/ac

Conversion per ton: (assume 4 tons/acre)

241 lb CO2 eq/ton

aUnless noted otherwise.

bBiochemical oxygen demand of effluent at wastewater treatment plants.

Source: Farrell et al., 2006.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

REFERENCES

Aden, A., M. Ruth, K. Ibsen, J. Jechura, K. Neeves, J. Sheehan, B. Wallace, L. Montague, A. Slayton, and J. Lukas. 2002. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. Golden, Colo.: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Banowetz, G.M., A. Boatang, J.J. Steiner, S.M. Griffith, V. Sethi, and H. El-Nashaar. 2008. Assessment of straw biomass feedstock resources in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass and Bioenergy 32:629-634.

Berdahl, J., A. Frank, J. Krupinsky, P. Carr, J. Hanson, and H. Johnson. 2005. Biomass yield, phenology, and survival of diverse switchgrass cultivars and experimental strains in western North Dakota. Agronomy Journal 97:549-555.

Christian, D., A. Riche, and N. Yates. 2008. Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus x Giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successful harvests. Industrial Crops and Products 28:320-327.

Duffy, M. 2007. Estimated Costs for Production, Storage, and Transportation of Switchgrass. Iowa State University. Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/pdf/a1-22.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2008.

Edwards, W. 2007. Estimating a Value for Corn Stover. Iowa State University. Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/pdf/a1-70.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2008.

English, B.C., D.G. de la Torre Ugarte, K. Jensen, C. Hellwinckel, J. Menard, B. Wilson, R. Roberts, and M. Walsh. 2006. 25% Renewable Energy for the United States by 2025: Agricultural and Economic Impacts. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.

Farrell, A., R. Plevin, B. Turner, A. Jones, M. O’Hare, and D. Kammen. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506-509.

Fike, J., D. Parrish, D. Wolf, J. Balasko, J. Green, Jr., M. Rasnake, and J. Reynolds. 2006. Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:198-206.

Heaton, E., T. Voight, and S.P. Long. 2004a. A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass and Bioenergy 27:21-30.

Heaton, E.A., J. Clifton-Brown, T.B. Voight, M.B. Jones, and S.P. Long. 2004b. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 9:433-451.

Hess, J.R., C.T. Wright, and K.L. Kenney. 2007. Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production. Biomass, Bioproduction and Biorefining 1:181-190.

Hoskinson, R.L., D.L. Karlen, S.J. Birrell, C.W. Radtke, and W.W. Wilhelm. 2007. Engineering, nutrient removal, and feedstock conversion evaluations of four corn stover harvest scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy 31:126-136.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

Karlen, D.L., and S.J. Birrell. Unpublished. Crop Residue—What’s It Worth? U.S. Department of Agriculture and Iowa State University. Available at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/Biomass_2009_Sustainabiliy_III_Karlen.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2009.

Kaylen, M., D.L. Van Dyne, Y.S. Choi, and M. Blase. 2000. Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Bioresource Technology 72:19-32.

Khanna, M., and B. Dhungana. 2007. Economics of Alternative Feedstocks in Corn-Based Ethanol in Illinois and the US: A Report from Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois. Available at http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/policy/research_reports/ethanol_report/Ethanol%20Report.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2009.

Khanna, M., B. Dhungana, and J. Clifton-Brown. 2008. Costs of producing Miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(6):482-493.

Kumar, A., and S. Sokhansanj. 2007. Switchgrass (Panicum vigratum, L.) delivery to a biorefinery using Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) Model. Bioresource Technology 98:1033-1044.

Kumar, A., J. Cameron, and P. Flynn. 2003. Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada. Biomass and Bioenergy 24(6):445-464.

Lewandowski, I., J. Scurlock, E. Lindvall, and M. Christou. 2003. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy 25(4):335-361.

Mapemba, L.D., F.M. Epplin, R.L. Huhnke, and C.M. Taliaferro. 2008. Herbaceous plant biomass harvest and delivery cost with harvest segmented by month and number of harvest machines endogenously determined. Biomass and Bioenergy 32:1016-1027.

Mapemba, L., F. Epplin, C. Taliaferro, and R. Huhnke. 2007. Biorefinery feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program Land. Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2):227-246.

McAloon, A., F. Taylor, W. Yee, K. Ibsen, and R. Wooley. 2000. Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. Golden, Colo.: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

McLaughlin, S.B., D.G. de la Torre Ugarte, C.T. Garten, Jr., L.R. Lynd, M.A. Sanderson, V.R. Tolbert, and D.D. Wolf. 2002. High-value renewable energy from prairie grasses. Environmental Science and Technology 36:2122-2129.

Perlack, R., and A. Turhollow. 2002. Assessment of Options for the Collection, Handling, and Transport of Corn Stover. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Perlack, R., and A. Turhollow. 2003. Feedstock cost analysis of corn stover residues for further processing. Energy 28:1395-1403.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

Perlack, R. 2007. Overview of Plant Feedstock Production for Biofuels: Current Technologies, Challenges, and Potential Improvement. Presentation to the National Research Council Committee on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels. Washington, D.C., November 19, 2007.

Perrin, R., K. Vogel, M. Schmer, and R. Mitchell. 2008. Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. Bioenergy Research 1:91-97.

Petrolia, D.R. 2008. The economics of harvesting and transporting corn stover to fuel ethanol: A case study for Minnesota. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(7):603-612.

Searcy, E., P. Flynn, E. Ghafoori, and A. Kumar. 2007. The relative cost of biomass energy transport. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 137-140(1-12):639-652.

Shinners, K.J., G.C. Boettcher, R.E. Muck, P.J. Weimer, M.D. Casler. 2006. Drying, harvesting, and storage characteristics of perennial grasses as biomass feedstocks. ASABE Paper No. 061012. St. Joseph, Mich.: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

Sokhansanj, S., and A. Turhollow. 2002. Baseline cost for corn stover collection. Applied Engineering and Agriculture 18:525-530.

Summit Ridge Investments, LLC. 2007. Eastern Hardwood Forest Region Woody Biomass Energy Opportunity. Granville, Vt: Summit Ridge Investments.

Suzuki, Y. 2006. Estimating the Cost of Transporting Corn Stalks in the Midwest. Ames: Iowa State University College of Business: Business and Partnership Development.

USDA-NASS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service). 2007a. Agricultural Prices 2006 Summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

USDA-NASS. 2007b. Agricultural Prices December 2007. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.

Vadas, P.A., K.H. Barnett, and D.J. Undersander. 2008. Economics and energy of ethanol production from alfalfa, corn, and switchgrass in the Upper Midwest, USA. Bioenergy Research 1:44-55.

Vogel, K., J. Brejda, D. Walters, and D. Buxton. 2002. Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and nitrogen management. Agronomy Journal 94:413-420.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 325
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 326
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 327
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 328
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 329
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 330
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 331
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 332
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 333
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 334
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 335
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 336
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 337
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Background Information on the Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Supply." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12620.
×
Page 338
Next: Appendix I: Modeling of Capital and Operating Costs and Carbon Emissions of Ethanol Plants with SuperPro Designer® »
Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts Get This Book
×
 Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts
Buy Paperback | $68.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The transportation sector cannot continue on its current path: The volatility of oil prices threatens the U.S. economy, the large proportion of oil importation threatens U.S. energy security, and the massive contribution of greenhouse gases threatens the environment. The development of domestic sources of alternative transportation fuels with lower greenhouse emissions is now a national imperative.

Coal and biomass are in abundant supply in the United States and can be converted to liquid fuels that can be combusted in existing and future vehicles. Their abundant supply makes them attractive candidates to provide non-oil-based liquid fuels to the U.S. transportation system. However, there are important questions about the economic viability, carbon impact, and technology status of these options.

Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass provides a snapshot of the potential costs of liquid fuels from biomass by biochemical conversion and from biomass and coal by thermochemical conversion. Policy makers, investors, leaders in industry, the transportation sector, and others with a concern for the environment, economy, and energy security will look to this book as a roadmap to independence from foreign oil. With immediate action and sustained effort, alternative liquid fuels can be available in the 2020 time frame, if or when the nation needs them.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!