Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

PAPERBACK
price:\$49.95

## Real Prospects for Energy Efficiency in the United States (2010) National Academy of Sciences (NAS)National Academy of Engineering (NAE)

### Citation Manager

. "Appendix F: Equivalences and Conversion Factors." Real Prospects for Energy Efficiency in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

 Page 322

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Real Prospects for Energy Efficiency in the United States

TABLE F.3 Electricity Used Annually by a Typical Home and Generated by a 500 Megawatt Power Plant

 A Typical Annual Use D Electricity Use in Units of 1 Million Homes 1 typical home 12,000 kWh — 1 million typical homes 12 TWh 1 Typical power plant (½ GW × 5,000 hours per year) 2.5 TWh 0.2

are roughly proportional to primary energy, although the cost per Btu would vary among fuels.

##### Using Table F.2 (Primary Energy)

With respect to the use of Table F.2, suppose one learns that low-energy (low-E) windows are saving 1 quad per year (1 quad = 1015 Btu, or 1 quadrillion Btu), which is about 1 percent of total U.S. energy use. One can use Column C of Table F.2 to divide by 1 million cars.

Similarly one could calculate 5 million equivalent homes or 38 power plants avoided.

##### Using Table F.3 (Electricity)

Suppose one learns, however, that the 2001 refrigerator standard will save 30 billion kWh, or 30 TWh, annually. In this case, Table F.3 indicates that a typical power plant sells 2.5 billion kWh per year (or 2.5 TWh), so it can be seen that as a result of the standard 12 power plants are avoided. Likewise, according to Table F.3, 1 million homes use 12 TWh, and so the standard has freed up electricity to supply 2.5 million homes.

But as is noted above, for every 100 Btu of electric energy, homes use another 50 Btu of fuel, so there has not been enough energy and pollution saved to offset 2.5 million homes, but only about 1.7 million.2

 2 This 1.7 million home offset can be checked by converting 30 TWh to trillion Btu (using the grid’s heat rate of 10,500 Btu/kWh) and then using Table F.2.
 Page 322
 Front Matter (R1-R18) Summary (1-20) 1 Energy Use in Context (21-40) 2 Energy Efficiency in Residential and Commercial Buildings (41-120) 3 Energy Efficiency in Transportation (121-184) 4 Energy Efficiency in industry (185-260) 5 Overarching Findings and Lessons Learned from Federal and State Energy Efficiency Policies and Programs (261-296) Appendixes (297-298) Appendix A: America's Energy Future Project (299-304) Appendix B: Panel Biographical Information (305-312) Appendix C: Presentations and Panel Meetings (313-314) Appendix D: Definitions of Energy Efficiency (315-316) Appendix E: Estimating the Net Costs and Benefits of Energy Savings (317-318) Appendix F: Equivalences and Conversion Factors (319-324) Appendix G: Acronyms and Abbreviations (325-330)