National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$44.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Citation Manager

Glickson, Deborah. "Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent." Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
1
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop

Introduction and Goals

Linwood Vincent*


In 2008, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) formulated a series of strategic roadmaps for the Navy’s major research focus areas to promote planning for the next series of budget requests. In this planning process, a longer term vision for each focus area is necessary to understand how the detailed short term (2-5 year) research fits within larger strategic goals. An additional aspect of this process is the integration of the efforts of ONR with that of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL).

The Physical Oceanography Program at ONR is within the Operational Environments Focus Area and has a corresponding effort at the NRL. Both organizations devised and then integrated roadmaps for oceanography in some detail out to 2015 and to a lesser degree of detail to 2025. The program managers based the roadmaps on their perception of potential progress in the science and the overarching needs of the Navy and the Marine Corps. Since in such a process it is impossible to foresee future funding trends, efforts were made to emphasize what should be possible technically. Everyone involved in the process felt unsure about reaching out to 2025 since so many unknown factors may have an influence on the path of achievement at that time.

During the same period, the Oceanographer of the Navy’s office embarked on a similar quest directed at a vision of where operational oceanography could be in 2025. This effort spanned not just oceanography, but all the major programs of the Oceanographer’s office (weather

*

Office of Naval Research

Page
1
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent (1-2)
Integrated Oceanography in 2025--John J. Cullen (3-5)
Oceanography in 2028--Mark Abbott (6-10)
The Changing Relationship Between Humans and the Ocean--J. G. Bellingham (11-13)
Societal Implications for Ocean Research in 2025--Matthew Alford (14-16)
Oceanography in 2025: Responding to Growing Populations on a Rapidly Changing Planet--Scott Glenn (17-21)
Some Thoughts on Physical Oceanography in 2025--Ken Melville (22-25)
The Next-Generation Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean-Ice-Land Models for Ocean Research and Prediction--Shuyi S. Chen (26-27)
Science in Action, Episode 1: Exploring Boundaries--Meghan F. Cronin (28-30)
Real Time Decision Support Everywhere--Nathaniel G. Plant (31-35)
Trends in Oceanography: More Data, More People, More Relevance--J. Thomson (36-38)
Future Developments to Observational Physical Oceanography--Tom Sanford (39-42)
Prospects for Oceanography in 2025--Michael Gregg (43-45)
Oceanography in 2025--John Orcutt (46-48)
Thoughts on Oceanography in 2025--Daniel Rudnick (49-51)
The Role of Observations in the Future of Oceanography--Raffaele Ferrari (52-54)
The Future . . . One More Time--Rob Pinkel (55-57)
The Role of Acoustics in Ocean Observing Systems--Peter Worcester and Walter Munk (58-62)
Oceanography in 2025--Walter Munk (63-64)
Physical Oceanography in 2025--Chris Garrett (65-67)
A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien (68-69)
Some Thoughts on Logistics, Mixing, and Power--J. N. Moum (70-72)
Ageostrophic Circulation in the Ocean--Peter Niiler (73-76)
The Future of Ocean Modeling--Sonya Legg, Alistair Adcroft, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, John Dunne, Stephen Griffies, Robert Hallberg, Matthew Harrison, Isaac Held, Tony Rosati, Robbie Toggweiler, Geoff Vallis, and Laurent White (77-80)
Towards Nonhydrostatic Ocean Modeling with Large-eddy Simulation--Oliver B. Fringer (81-83)
Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan (84-88)
Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams (89-91)
Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman (92-97)
Future of Nearshore Processes Research--Rob Holman (98-100)
Future Directions in Nearshore Oceanography--H. Tuba Özkan-Haller (101-103)
Science Strategies for the Arctic Ocean--Mary-Louise Timmermans (104-106)
Submesoscale Variability of the Upper Ocean: Patchy and Episodic Fluxes Into and Through Biologically Active Layers--Daniel Rudnick, Mary Jane Perry, John J. Cullen, Bess Ward, and Kenneth S. Johnson (107-110)
Who's Blooming? Toward an Understanding of Why Certain Species Dominate Phytoplankton Blooms--Mary Jane Perry, Michael Sieracki, Bess Ward, and Alan Weidemann (111-114)
Understanding Phytoplankton Bloom Development--Bess Ward and Mary Jane Perry (115-117)
From Short Food Chains to Complex Interaction Webs: Biological Oceanography in 2025--Kelly J. Benoit-Bird (118-120)
The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes--Mark Abbott (121-123)
Research on Higher Trophic Levels--Daniel P. Costa, Yann Tremblay, and Sean Hayes (124-129)
Marine Biogeochemistry in 2025--Kenneth S. Johnson (130-134)
Next-Generation Oceanographic Sensors for Short-Term Prediction/Verification of In-water Optical Conditions--Mark L. Wells (135-137)
Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis (138-140)
Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025--Eric D'Asaro (141-143)
Small Scale Ocean Dynamics in 2025--Jonathan Nash (144-145)
Oceanography in 2025--Dana R. Yoerger (146-149)
The Research Vessel Problem--J. N. Moum, Eric D'Asaro, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Peter Niiler (150-152)
"Ocean Mapping" in 2025--Larry Mayer (153-156)
Seismic Oceanography: Imaging Oceanic Finestructure with Reflection Seismology--W. Steven Holbrook (157-162)
The Ocean Planet 2.0: A Vision for 2025--Justin Manley (163-165)
Force Projection Through the Littoral Zone: Optical Considerations--Kendall Carder (166-170)
Large Scale Phase-resolved Simulations of Ocean Surface Waves--Yuming Liu and Dick K.P. Yue (171-176)
Appendixes (177-178)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (179-180)
Appendix B: Workshop Participants (181-186)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop Introduction and Goals Linwood Vincent* In 2008, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) formulated a series of strategic roadmaps for the Navy’s major research focus areas to promote planning for the next series of budget requests. In this planning process, a longer term vision for each focus area is necessary to understand how the detailed short term (2-5 year) research fits within larger strategic goals. An additional aspect of this process is the integration of the efforts of ONR with that of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL). The Physical Oceanography Program at ONR is within the Operational Environments Focus Area and has a corresponding effort at the NRL. Both organizations devised and then integrated roadmaps for oceanography in some detail out to 2015 and to a lesser degree of detail to 2025. The program managers based the roadmaps on their perception of potential progress in the science and the overarching needs of the Navy and the Marine Corps. Since in such a process it is impossible to foresee future funding trends, efforts were made to emphasize what should be possible technically. Everyone involved in the process felt unsure about reaching out to 2025 since so many unknown factors may have an influence on the path of achievement at that time. During the same period, the Oceanographer of the Navy’s office embarked on a similar quest directed at a vision of where operational oceanography could be in 2025. This effort spanned not just oceanography, but all the major programs of the Oceanographer’s office (weather * Office of Naval Research

OCR for page 2
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop and ocean forecasting, charting, etc.). Although the emphasis was on technology and operations, an important element was to envision what scientists in various fields needed to have accomplished by the 2025 timeframe. The participants in this effort were mainly drawn from the operational commands with participation from the ONR/NRL research community. In reviewing the processes for the two Navy studies it is clear that one group that has not been formally engaged in this process are the research scientists who, to a large part, will create the new science from now until 2025. ONR asked the Ocean Studies Board to hold a workshop to address Oceanography in 2025 from the research perspective. Realizing that few people have perfect foresight about the future, the goal was to solicit the viewpoints of a wide range of scientists with the expectation that the sum of the viewpoints, unfiltered, may better span the set of possibilities than a consensus. The workshop proceedings will be useful as a comparison to the visions expressed in both the ONR roadmaps and the Oceanographer’s vision statement. Additionally, the Ocean Studies Board has been tasked by the Navy, the National Science Foundation (NSF) and other members of the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology (JSOST) to address two related studies: ocean research infrastructure needs out to 2030, and the evolution of the U.S. academic research fleet over the next few decades. Both of these studies inherently depend upon some vision of oceanography in 2025, and will utilize the input provided by this workshop. Finally, by making the proceedings widely available, the oceanographic community as a whole is invited to consider the research trajectory for the next 16 years.