National Academies Press: OpenBook

Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops (2009)

Chapter: Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism--Gennady G. Onishchenko

« Previous: Computer Security Training for Professional Specialists and Other Personnel Associated with Preventing and Responding to Computer Attacks--Anatoly A. Malyuk, Nikolai S. Pogozhin, and Aleksey I. Tolstoy
Suggested Citation:"Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism--Gennady G. Onishchenko." National Research Council. 2009. Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12629.
×
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism--Gennady G. Onishchenko." National Research Council. 2009. Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12629.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism--Gennady G. Onishchenko." National Research Council. 2009. Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12629.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism--Gennady G. Onishchenko." National Research Council. 2009. Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12629.
×
Page 132

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism Gennady G. Onishchenko* Russian Ministry of Health The national strategy for health protection against infectious diseases must also take into account the problem of combating bioterrorism, a problem that is the focus of increasing attention on the part of the government, the public, and specialists in many countries. Underestimating modern biological capabilities and the dangers they entail could have a disastrous impact on the national securi- ty of the state. The imperfect nature of mechanisms for monitoring compliance with the chemical and biological weapons conventions, suspicions regarding the continu- ation of work on biological weapons programs, and a number of incidents in- volving attempts to intentionally use biological agents for terrorist purposes are evoking serious concerns that terrorists might actually use biological means as weapons. One of the first and most illustrative examples of the use of bioterrorism was the intentional poisoning of residents of a small city in the state of Oregon (United States) in September 1984 by means of adding Salmonella typhimurium to the salad dressing at 10 of the city’s most popular restaurants. The aim of this action was to cause a massive number of food poisoning cases and thus affect the outcome of local elections according to the interests of representatives of a cult sect. Two points are worthy of note. First, officials investigating the mass poi- soning incident took a year to determine that the Salmonella had been introduced by terrorists. Second, the American authorities prohibited any information about this incident from being published for 12 years because of their concerns that it might serve as an example for other extremists throughout the country. *Translated from the Russian by Kelly Robbins. 129

130 RUSSIAN VIEWS ON COUNTERING TERRORISM Other subsequent cases involving the attempted use of biological agents for terrorist purposes have triggered a flood of publications and numerous scientific conferences and have spurred many countries, especially the United States, to institute many legislative, legal, organizational, medical, and other measures aimed at countering bioterrorism. The United States has devoted substantial sums to the problem of fighting bioterrorism, including on matters of “internal preparedness,” inasmuch as expert analyses, evaluations, and inspections have led to the conclu- sion that in most cases, public service agencies are not prepared to respond to terrorist attacks involving the use of biological weapons. Efforts are under way to implement a program to develop and create stockpiles of 18 new vaccines, includ- ing a new smallpox vaccine. In addition, funds have been allocated to create a stockpile of medicines and antibiotics, which are intended primarily for use by police, fire, and emergency medical personnel. Appropriate attention is being fo- cused on the fight against terrorism in Russia as well. The Interagency Antiterror- ism Commission was created in 1997, the State Duma passed the Law on Combat- ing Terrorism in July 1998, and the Government of the Russian Federation issued a resolution establishing a federal targeted program in 1999. Although many countries have well-prepared systems for combating ordi- nary terrorism and dealing with emergency situations (floods, earthquakes, acci- dents, and catastrophes), none has put in place a complete set of measures for meeting this new threat. This is because for many reasons it is extremely diffi- cult to combat the use of biological agents for terrorist purposes (the large num- ber of potential agents, the long incubation period, the lag time before symptoms of illness appear, the possibility of secondary infection and the further spread of the disease, and so forth). Medical personnel must also play a special role when bioterrorist acts are carried out. They must understand the epidemiological situation and know the potential biological agents and the symptoms of the infectious diseases they cause, which as a rule would differ from those of naturally occurring illnesses. They must also be aware of treatment protocols and measures for preventing the spread of epidemics. However, the current state of affairs is such that most clinical microbiological laboratories have neither the capabilities nor the experi- ence in real-life detection and identification of infectious agents from a list of those that might be used by bioterrorists, such as anthrax, brucellosis, botulism, cholera, plague, smallpox, hemorrhagic fever viruses, and others. Biological agents of critical importance from the standpoint of civilian pub- lic service preparedness may be divided into the following three categories based on their characteristics: 1. Category A • smallpox (Variola major) • anthrax (Bacillus anthracis)

TERRORISM 131 • plague (Yersinia pestis) • botulism (Clostridium botilinum) • tularemia (Francisella tularensis) • hemorrhagic fevers (filoviruses, arenaviruses, and so forth) 2. Category B • Q-fever (Coxiella burnetii) • brucellosis (Brucella spp.) • glanders (Burkholderia mallei) • melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei) • viral encephalitis (Venezuelan equine encephalitis, Western equine encephalitis, Eastern equine encephalitis, and so forth) • typhus (Rickettsia prowazekii) • psittacosis (Chlamydia psittaci) • foodborne agents (Salmonella spp., Shingella dysenteriae, E. coli 0157:H7, and so forth) • waterborne agents (Vibrio cholerae, Cryptosporidium parvum, and so forth) 3. Category C Newly emerging agents (antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis, Nipah virus, AIDS, and so forth) Without denying that health care institutions respond rather adequately to naturally occurring infectious disease outbreaks, it must be noted that a signifi- cant proportion of the methods currently used in Russia to identify pathogens do not meet the necessary standards for identifying biological agents that are used intentionally. These methods have become outdated and are unsatisfactory pri- marily from the standpoint of the time required to use them. The system of scientific, organizational, and other measures aimed at im- proving the preparedness of the health care system for meeting the threat of bioterrorism must not undermine the measures already in place to combat infec- tious diseases. Instead, it should promote the constant improvement of the health care and biomedical research infrastructure and facilitate cooperation involving the capabilities of other agencies, such as the Ministry for Emergency Situations, regional units of the sanitary-epidemiological service, and relevant scientific research institutes. The most important measures to be taken in improving these efforts would include the following:

132 RUSSIAN VIEWS ON COUNTERING TERRORISM • The major regional centers, especially those with international airports, should have permanently operating infectious disease hospitals equipped to at least the P-3 biosafety level. • These hospitals must be amenable to continuously improving their meth- ods for treating infectious diseases, up to and including being willing to partici- pate in clinical trials of new drugs and actually doing so. • Regional clinical microbiological and immunological laboratories are also needed, and it is important that they be fully operational according to the highest modern standards. They should be associated with the infectious disease hospi- tals mentioned above and should be equipped to at least the P-3 biosafety level. • These laboratories must be open to new technologies and methods of identifying, diagnosing, and deactivating infectious agents, and in this regard, they must support close linkages with the relevant scientific research institutes working in the given field. The following actions should be taken as part of the Federal Scientific Re- search Program on Combating Bioterrorism: • Develop new express immuno-enzyme and other test systems for detect- ing antigens and antibodies as markers for hemorrhagic fever viruses, smallpox, anthrax, tularemia, plague, legionellosis, malaria, and so forth. • Develop various types of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests, including those using biochip technology, for express diagnosis and detec- tion of pathogens within a few hours or even minutes. • Establish modern, well-equipped PCR laboratories in various regions of Russia. • Conduct additional research on the pathogenic characteristics of espe- cially dangerous infectious agents and search for new medications for treatment and emergency prophylaxis of individuals infected with these agents. • Develop vaccines against infectious agents for which none yet exist or for which existing vaccines are inadequately effective or unsatisfactory for other reasons. • Provide specialized training for medical personnel and laboratory work- ers in safe methods for handling, analyzing, and detecting such agents in re- search centers and clinics with real experience in this area. Efforts in these areas will not only bring real results in the struggle against bioterrorism but will also improve the health care situation in general.

Next: Certain Aspects Regarding the Development of Conditions Favorable to Cyberterrorism and the Main Areas of Cooperation in the Struggle Against It--Igor A. Sokolov and Vladimir I. Budzko »
Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four U.S.-Russian Workshops Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $98.00 Buy Ebook | $79.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Few countries have endured as many attacks of terrorism during the past two decades as has Russia. From bombings on the streets of a number of cities, to the disruption of pipelines in Dagestan, to the taking of hundreds of hostages at a cultural center in Moscow and at a school in Beslan, the Russian government has responded to many political and technical challenges to protect the population. The measures that have been undertaken to reduce vulnerabilities to terrorist attacks and to mitigate the consequences of attacks have been of widespread interest in many other countries as well.

In June 1999, the Presidents of the National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences initiated an inter-academy program to jointly address common interests in the field of counter-terrorism. Four workshops were held from 2001 to 2007 and additional consultations were undertaken prior to and after the series of workshops. This report includes 35 of the Russian presentations during the workshop series. Collectively they provide a broad overview of activities that have been supported by Russian institutions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!