APPENDIX D
Comparison of Rankings Proposed by the Committee with the FSIS15 Ranking of Risk Considerations16

15

Based on Donald Anderson (FSIS) Public Health “Risk Based” In-Commerce Surveillance, presented to the Committee, November 6, 2008.

16

Differences are identified by shading.

17

“Gather info” recognizes that surveillance by other authorities varies by state and region. Partnering with federal, state, and local jurisdictions to understand the level of surveillance activity, including existence or establishment of Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) within each region should be done to determine ranking specific to the region under surveillance by the CID inspector.

18

Pet food facilities, which are under FDA jurisdiction, are Low. Meat products destine for other animal use (e.g. mink farms, zoos, animal parks) may not have other surveillance.

19

Consumer Susceptibility for child care, primary schools, nursing homes, and hospital institutions is High; other institutions are ranked a medium



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 28
APPENDIX D Comparison of Rankings Proposed by the Committee with the FSIS15 Ranking of Risk Considerations16 Consumer Surveillance by Other Inherent Hazard Food Defense Volume Susceptibility Authorities FSIS Committee FSIS Committee FSIS Committee FSIS Committee FSIS Committee Gather info17 4-D Medium Low Medium Medium Low Low Low Low High Varied18 Animal Food Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Renderers Medium Medium Low High Low Low Low Low High Gather info Custom Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Low Medium Medium Medium Gather info Exempt Poultry Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Low Medium Medium Low Gather info Food Banks Low Medium High High Low Low Medium Medium Medium Gather info Retail Salvage Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium Gather info Transporters Medium Medium High High High High Medium Medium High Gather info Distributors Medium Medium Medium Medium High High Medium Medium High Gather info Warehouses Medium Medium Medium Medium High High Medium Medium High Gather info Retailers Medium High High High Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Low Restaurants High Varied High High Low Low Medium Medium Low Low Varied19 Institutions High High High High Low Low High Low Low 15 Based on Donald Anderson (FSIS) Public Health “Risk Based” In-Commerce Surveillance, presented to the Committee, November 6, 2008. 16 Differences are identified by shading. 17 “Gather info” recognizes that surveillance by other authorities varies by state and region. Partnering with federal, state, and local jurisdictions to understand the level of surveillance activity, including existence or establishment of Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) within each region should be done to determine ranking specific to the region under surveillance by the CID inspector. 18 Pet food facilities, which are under FDA jurisdiction, are Low. Meat products destine for other animal use (e.g. mink farms, zoos, animal parks) may not have other surveillance. 19 Consumer Susceptibility for child care, primary schools, nursing homes, and hospital institutions is High; other institutions are ranked a medium 26