Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 35
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved References ABET. (2008). 2008-09 Criteria for evaluating engineering programs. Available online at http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008-09%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-30-07.pdf. Aleamoni, L. M. (1981). Student ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (Ed.) Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Arreola, R. A. (1997). On the tightrope. The Department Chair, 7 (4). Boston, MA: Anker Publishing Co. Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Arreola, R. A., Theall, M., & Aleamoni, L. M. (2003). Beyond scholarship: Recognizing the multiple roles of the professoriate. Paper presented at the 2003 American Educational Research Association Convention, Chicago, IL. Available online at http://www.cedanet.com/meta/Beyond%20Scholarship.pdf. Atman, C. J. (2007, June 8). Engineering education research: Some history and examples from the U.S. Opening address to the Danish Centre for Engineering Education Research and Development, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online at http://www.engr.washington.edu/caee/Atman%202007.06.08%20Denmark-final.pdf. Braskamp, L. A. & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Brint, S. (2008). The Spellings Commission and the case for professionalizing college teaching. ACADEME Online. Available at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2008/MJ/Feat/brin.htm. England, J. (1996). How evaluations of teaching are used in personnel decisions. American Council of Learned Societies, Occasional Paper N. 33. Available at http://archives.acls.org/op/33_Professonal_Evaluation_of_Teaching.htm. Felder, R. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290. Lencioni, P. M. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88 (3), 355-383. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OCR for page 36
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved National Research Council. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Foundation. (2002). Science and engineering indicators 2002. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/c3/c3s2.htm. Paese, P. W., Lind, E. A., & Kanfer. (1988). Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluation systems. Social Justice Research 2(3), 193-205. Theall, M. (2007, June 11). Basic issues in good evaluation practice. Invited presentation at the Academic Impressions Institute’s Using Faculty Evaluation Data for Decision Making, Boston, MA. United States Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: USDEd. University of Texas. Preparing for peer observation: A handbook. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://www.utexas.edu/academic/cte/PeerObserve.html#AppendixList. Van Note, C. H., & Szabo, B. (1996). Who uses faculty development services? In To Improve the Academy, vol. 16. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, Inc. Van Prooijen, J-W. (2007). Fairness judgments: Genuine morality or disguised egocentrism? In Mind Articles, Special Issue 5. Available online at http://www.in-mind.org/special-issue/fairness-judgments-genuine-morality-or-disguised-egocent.html.
OCR for page 37
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved Appendixes
OCR for page 38
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved This page intentionally left blank.