Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$21.00 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum Other Related Titles Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved (2009) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Appendix A Workshop Agenda and Attendees." Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. Please select a format: Page 39   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Appendix A Workshop Agenda and Attendees Workshop on Metrics of Instructional Scholarship November 13, 2007 National Academy of Science Building 2100 C Street, NW, Washington, DC Room 150 Meeting Agenda: 8:30 am Welcome and Opening Comments by Study Committee Chair C. Judson King – University of California Berkeley 8:45 – 10:15 Presentations regarding strategies for developing candidate metrics, assessment or scoring, and evaluation agents. Larry Braskamp – Loyola University of Chicago Lawrence Aleamoni – University of Arizona Michael Theall – Youngstown State University John Bardo – Western Carolina University 10:15 – 10:30 Break 10:30 – 12:30 pm Breakout Discussions – Breakout Groups will address the points raised in presentations and augment those ideas in order to propose methods to devise a metric/rubric. Community Acceptance would be dealt with by all groups of discussants. 12:30 – 1:30 Lunch – Continue breakout group discussions 1:30 – 2:30 Brief Presentations from each of the breakout groups 2:45 – 4:30 Plenary Discussion – Moving toward group consensus for Metric Development, Scoring, Assessment/Evaluating Body and Community Acceptance 4:30 Adjourn Page 39 Front Matter (R1-R10) Executive Summary (1-3) 1 Background, Framing, and Concepts (4-8) 2 Governing Principles of Good Metrics (9-11) 3 ASSUMPTIONS (12-14) 4 What To Measure (15-22) 5 Measuring Teaching Performance (23-32) 6 Conclusions and Recommendations (33-34) References (35-38) Appendix A Workshop Agenda and Attendees (39-40) Appendix B Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (41-42)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 39
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved Appendix A Workshop Agenda and Attendees Workshop on Metrics of Instructional Scholarship November 13, 2007 National Academy of Science Building 2100 C Street, NW, Washington, DC Room 150 Meeting Agenda: 8:30 am Welcome and Opening Comments by Study Committee Chair C. Judson King – University of California Berkeley 8:45 – 10:15 Presentations regarding strategies for developing candidate metrics, assessment or scoring, and evaluation agents. Larry Braskamp – Loyola University of Chicago Lawrence Aleamoni – University of Arizona Michael Theall – Youngstown State University John Bardo – Western Carolina University 10:15 – 10:30 Break 10:30 – 12:30 pm Breakout Discussions – Breakout Groups will address the points raised in presentations and augment those ideas in order to propose methods to devise a metric/rubric. Community Acceptance would be dealt with by all groups of discussants. 12:30 – 1:30 Lunch – Continue breakout group discussions 1:30 – 2:30 Brief Presentations from each of the breakout groups 2:45 – 4:30 Plenary Discussion – Moving toward group consensus for Metric Development, Scoring, Assessment/Evaluating Body and Community Acceptance 4:30 Adjourn

OCR for page 40
Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering Instruction: What Gets Measured is What Gets Improved Workshop Attendees Lawrence Aleamoni, University of Arizona Susan Ambrose, Carnegie Mellon University Brownell Anderson, Association of American Medical Colleges Raoul Arreola, University of Tennessee John Bardo, Western Carolina University Larry Braskamp, Loyola University of Chicago Elizabeth Cady, National Academy of Engineering Mark Fleury, National Academy of Engineering Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Kamyar Haghighi, Purdue University Susan Kemnitzer, The National Science Foundation Julia Kregenow, National Academy of Sciences Thomas Litzinger, The Pennsylvania State University Jack Lohmann, Georgia Institute of Technology James Melsa, American Society for Engineering Education Lueny Morrell, Hewlett Packard Company Wilfrid Nixon, American Society of Civil Engineers George P. “Bud” Peterson, The University of Colorado M.P. Ravindra, Infosys Technologies, Limited Paul Savory, University of Nebraska Allen Soyster, National Science Foundation Richard Taber, National Academy of Engineering Mike Theall, Youngstown State University Elizabeth VanderPutten, National Science Foundation Thomas Walker, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Robert Warrington, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Karan Watson, Texas A&M University