National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 4 Water for Tomorrow
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2009. Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12672.
×
Page 108

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI). 2004. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Available online at http://acwi.gov/coop2004/Coop TFRpt. pdf. Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwartz, E. W. Boyer, J. V. Nolan, and J. W. Brakebill. 2008. Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to The Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environmental Science and Technology 42(3):822-830. Altenburger, R., H. Walter, and M. Grote. 2004. What contributes to the com- bined effect of a complex chemical mixture? Environmental Science and Technology 38(23): 6353-6362. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2009. 2009 Report Card for American In- frastructure. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org. Bates, B. C., Z. W. Kundzewicz, S. Wu, and J. P. Palutikof, eds. 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva. 210 pp. Bazerman, M. H., and M. D. Watkins. 2004. Predictable Surprises: The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming, and How to Prevent Them. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. 316 pp. Boesch, D. F. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal systems. Estuaries 25: 744-758. Brian, J. P., C. A. Harris, M. Scholze, T. Backhaus, P. Booy, M. Lamoree, G. Po- jana, N, Jonkers, T. Runnalls, A. Bonfá, A. Marcomini, and J. P. Sumpter. 2005. Accurate prediction of the response of freshwater fish to a mixture of estrogenic chemicals. Environmental Health Persepctives 113(6): 721-728. California Energy Commission. 2005. California’s Water-Energy Relationship. Final staff report. CEC-700-2005-011-SF. Available online at www.fypower. org/pdf/CEC_Water-Energy(Nov.2005).pdf. Capel, P. D., K. A. McCarthy, and J. E. Barbash. 2008. National, holistic, water- shed-scale approach to understand the sources, transport and fate of agricul- tural chemicals. Journal of Environmental Quality 37: 983-993. 101

102 Toward A Sustainable and Secure Water Future Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). 2008. The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity. A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 362 pp. Coles, J. F., T. F. Cuffney, G. McMahon, and K. M. Beaulieu. 2004. The effects of urbanization on the biological, physical, and chemical characteristics of coastal New England streams: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1695. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Constantz, J., K. S. Adams, and D. A. Stonestrom. 2007. Overview of ground- water recharge study sites. Pp. 61-82 in Ground-Water in the Arid and Semi- arid Southwestern United States. D. A. Stonestrom, J. Constantz, T. P. A. Ferre, and S. A. Leake, eds. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703. Menlo Park, CA: U.S. Geological Survey. Cox, M. H., G. W. Su, and J. Constantz. 2007. Heat, chloride, and specific con- ductance as ground water tracers near streams. Ground Water 45: 187-195. Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 33: 245-303. Environmental Benchmarker and Strategist. 2007. The State of the Water Indus- try, Winter 2007. Focazio, M. J., D. W. Kolpin, K. K. Barnes, E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and E. M. Thurman. 2008. A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States: II Untreated drinking water sources. Science of the Total Environment 402: 201-216. Flint, L. E., and A. L. Flint. 2007. Regional analysis of ground-water recharge. Pp. 29-60 in Ground-Water in the Arid and Semiarid Southwestern United States. D. A. Stonestrom, J. Constantz, T. P. A. Ferre, and S. A. Leake, eds. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703. Menlo Park, CA: U.S. Geological Survey. Freas, K., R. Bailey, A. Munevar, and S. Butler. 2008. Incorporating climate change in water planning. Journal AWWA 100 (6): 92-99. Gallup Earth Day Poll. 2007. Available online at http://www.galluppoll.com/ content/default.aspx?ci=1615&pg=2. Global Water Research Coalition. 2004. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Pro- ducts in the Water Cycle; An International Review. Kiwa Water Research and Stowa (Netherlands) and Global Water Research Coalition, United Kingdom. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2003. Freshwater Supply: States’ Views of How Federal Agencies Could Help Meet Challenges of Expected Shortages. Report to Congressional Requesters GAO-03-514. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office. Green, C.T., L. H. Fisher, and B. A. Bekins. 2008. Nitrogen fluxes through un- saturated zones in five agricultural settings across the United States. J Envi- ron Qual. 37: 1073-1085.

References 103 Groves, D. G., J. Griffin, and S. Hajiamiri. 2008. Estimating the Value of Water- Use Efficiency in the Intermountain West. RAND Corporation technical re- port series. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Harbaugh, A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald. 2000a. MOD- FLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-water Model- User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92. 121 p. Harbaugh, A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald. 2000b. MOD- FLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-water Model- User Guide to Observation, Sensitivity, and Parameter-Estimation Processes and Three Post-Processing Programs. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Re- port 00-184. 209 p. Heinz Center. 2003. Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects. W. L. Graf, ed. Washington, D.C.: Heinz Center. Heinz Center. 2008. The State of The Nation’s Ecosystems; Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Hutson, S. S., N. L. Barber, J. F. Kenny, K. S. Linsey, D. S. Lumia, and M. A. Maupin. 2004. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268. Washington, D.C., USGS. Job, C. 2008. EPA’s Sustainable Infrastructure Initiative. Ground Water Monitor- ing and Remediation, 28 (1): 42-43. (See also EPA’s Sustainable Infrastruc- ture Initiative at www.epa.gov/water/infrastructure/.) Kolpin, D. W., E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, E. M. Thurman, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and H. T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other or- ganic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000—A national re- connaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36(6): 1202-1211. Lanfear, K. J. 2005. A Near-optimum Procedure for Selecting Stations in a Streamgaging Network. Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5001. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Leake, S. A., D. R. Pool, and J. M. Leenhouts. 2008. Simulated effects of ground- water withdrawals and artificial recharge on discharge to streams, springs, and riparian vegetation in the Sierra Vista Subwatershed of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investiga- tions Report 2008-5207. 14 p. McKenzie, J. M., D. I. Siegel, D. O. Rosenberry, P. H. Glaser, and C. I. Voss. 2007. Heat transport in the Red Lake Bog, glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands. Hydrological Processes 21: 369-378. Mehan, G. T. III. 2009. Water’s Worth: Our cup runneth dry. The Environ Forum. Environ Law Inst 26(2): 26-31. Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither wa- ter management? Science 319: 573-574. Moss, M. E. 1982. Concepts and techniques in hydrological network design. Operational Hydrology Report No. 19, WMO Report No. 580. Geneva, Swit-

104 Toward A Sustainable and Secure Water Future zerland: World Meteorological Organization. 30 p. Moss, M. E., and G. D. Tasker. 1991. An intercomparison of hydrological net- work-design technologies. Hydrological Sciences Journal 36(3): 209-221. Moran, M. 2007. Occurrence of methyl tert-butyl ether and other fuel oxygenates in source water and drinking water of the United States. Environ. Chem. 5(part R): 57-73. National Drought Mitigation Center. 2008. United States Drought Moni- tor/University of Nebraska, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Accessed June 2008. Available online at http://drought.unl.edu/ dm/monitor.html. National Hydrologic Warning Council (NHWC). 2006. Benefits of USGS Streamgaging Program; Users and Uses of Streamflow Data. Denver, CO. Available online at http://hydrologicwarning.org/content.aspx?page_id=86& club_id=617218. National Research Council (NRC). 2001a. Envisioning the Agenda for Water Re- sources Research in the Twenty-first Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2001b. Future Roles and Opportunities for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2002a. Estimating Water Use in the United States: A new Paradigm for the National Water-Use Information Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2002b. Opportunities to Improve the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment Program. Washing- ton, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2003. Water Use Science: Improving The Water Use Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: Na- tional Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2004a. Assessing the National Streamflow Information System. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2004b. Confronting the Nation’s Water Prob- lems: The Role of Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2006. Progress Toward Restoring the Ever - glades: The First Biennial Review. Washington, D.C.: The National Acad- emies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2007. River Science at the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2008a. Desalinization: A National Perspec- tive. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2008b. Water Implications of Biofuels Pro- duction in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2008c. Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: National Acad- emies Press.

References 105 National Research Council (NRC). 2008d. Mississippi River Water Quality and the Clean Water Act: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Informing Decisions in a changing Climate. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC). 2007. A Strategy for Federal Science and Technology to Support Water Availability and Quality in the United States. Report of the Subcommittee on Water Availability and Quality of the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. Washington, D.C. Nolan, B. T., K. J. Hitt, and B. C. Ruddy. 2002. Probability of nitrate contamina- tion of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. and Tech. 36(10): 2138-2145. NUS Consulting Group. 2008. Rising prices reflect increasing awareness of global water shortages. World Water and Environmental Engineering, Janu- ary/February. Park Ridge, NJ: NUS Consulting Group. Available online at http://www.nusconsulting.com/. Palmer, M. A., and J. D. Allan. 2006. Restoring Rivers: The work has begun, but we have yet to determine what works best. Issues in Science and Technology 22: 40-48. Pate, R., M. Hightower, C. Cameron, and W. Einfeld. 2007. Overview of Energy- Water Interdependencies And The Emerging Energy Demands On Water Re- sources. Report SAND 2007-1349C. Los Alamos, NM: Sandia National La- boratories. Pg. 67 in 12th Annual Water Conservation and Xeriscape Confer- ence Notebook. Albuquerque, NM: Xeriscape Council of New Mexico, Inc. Power, M. 2008. Peak Water: Aquifers and Rivers are Running Dry. How Three Regions Are Coping. Wired Magazine 16.05. Accessed online at http://www. wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/16-05/ff_peakwater, July 14, 2008. Puckett, L. J., C. Zamora, H. Essaid, J. T. Wilson, H. M. Johnson, M. J. Brayton, and J. R. Vogel. 2008. Transport and fate of nitrate at the ground-water/- surface water interface. J Environ Qual. 37: 1034-1050. Reilly, T. E., K .F. Dennehy, W. A. Alley, and W. L. Cunnigham. 2008. Ground- Water Availability in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1323. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Schwarzenbach, R. P., B. I. Escher, K. Fenner, T. B. Hofstetter, C. A.Johnson, U. von Gunten, and B. Wehrli. 2006. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science. 313: 1072-1077. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 2000-2050. Available online at http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/us- interimproj/. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: An Update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB- 08-003. Washington, D.C.: EPA Science Advisory Board. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008a. Contaminant Candidate List. Accessed 2008. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl /index.html.

106 Toward A Sustainable and Secure Water Future U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008b. National Summary of Impaired Waters and TMDL Information. Available online at ttp://iaspub.epa. gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control?p_report_type=T#imp_water_by_state. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008c. Investing in a Sustain- able Future; 2007 Report of the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. EPA- 816-R-08-002. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Of- fice of Water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008d. EPA’s 2008 Report on the Environment. EPA/600/R-07/045F. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. Drinking Water Infra- structure Needs Survey and Assessment; Fourth Report to Congress. EPA 816-R-09-001. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Of- fice of Water. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1999a. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Circular 1192. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1999b. Strategic Directions for the Water Re- sources Division, 1998-2008. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99- 249. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2002. Ground-water Resources of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Circular 1222. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/ circ/2002/circ1222/. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2004. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Available online at http://acwi.gov/coop2004/CoopTFRpt.pdf. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006a. Probing the Los Angeles Basin- Insights Into Ground-Water Resources and Earthquake Hazards. Fact Sheet 086-02. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006b. The quality of our Nation’s waters – Volatile organic compounds in the Nation’s ground water and drinking-water supply wells. Circular 1292. 101 p. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006c. The quality of our Nation’s waters – Pesticides in the Nation’s streams and ground water, 1992-2001. Circular 1291. 172 p. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2007a. Facing tomorrow’s challenges—U.S. Geological Survey Science in the Decade 2007–2017. Circular 1309. Res- ton, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2007b. Forecasting the Range-wide Status of Polar Bears at Selected Times in the 21st Century. Administrative Report. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2008. Adapted from Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Ba- sin. Available online at http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/gulf_findings/ hypoxia.html.

References 107 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2009. Climate change and water resources management: a federal perspective. Circular 1331, 65 p. U.S. News and World Report. 2007. Front cover, June 4th, 2007. United National Environmental Programme (UNEP). 2006. State of the Marine Environment. The Hauge. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available online at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/ special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt. Wallis, M. J., M. R. Ambrose, and C. C. Chan. 2008. Climate change: Charting a water course in an uncertain future. Journal AWWA 100(6): 70-79. Winter, T. C., J. W. Harvey, O.L. Franke, and W. M. Alley. 1998. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1139. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey. World Economic Forum. 2009. The bubble is close to bursting: a forecast of the main economic and geopolitical water issues likely to arise in the world dur- ing the next two decades. Published online at www.weforum.org.

Next: Appendix A: Biographical Information »
Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Water is our most fundamental natural resource, a resource that is limited. Challenges to our nation's water resources continue to grow, driven by population growth, ecological needs, climate change, and other pressures. The nation needs more and improved water science and information to meet these challenges.

Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future reviews the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Water Resource Discipline (WRD), one of the nation's foremost water science organizations. This book provides constructive advice to help the WRD meet the nation's water needs over the coming decades. Of interest primarily to the leadership of the USGS WRD, many findings and recommendations also target the USGS leadership and the Department of Interior (DOI), because their support is necessary for the WRD to respond to the water needs of the nation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!