National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin (2009)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)

Citation Manager

. "11 Reproductive Decisions Under Ecological Constraints: It's About Time--Patricia Adair Gowaty and Stephen P. Hubbell." In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
232
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


In the Light of Evolution Volume III: Two Centuries of Darwin

rejecting potential mates—could simultaneously reject one hypothesis and provide support for the alternative.

The SPT is an Alternative Hypothesis to Parental Investment Theory

For species in which parental investment is biased toward one sex, investigators could compete the predictions of the SPT with parental investment theory. Controlling for s, e, n, l, and w distribution for experimental subjects, the predicted behavior of individuals of different sexes would be the same under the SPT. Parental investment theory, by contrast, predicts that in a species with female-biased parental investment, females would reject more and males would accept more potential mates, whereas, in a species with male-biased parental investment, females would accept more and males reject more potential mates. Another valuable test would be of virgins of both sexes, for whom l = 0, in species with female-biased parental investment and in species with male-biased parental investment. As with anisogamy theory, these alternative predictions of the SPT and parental investment theory could be tested with a crucial experiment.

Almost Nothing Is Known Empirically About w Distributions

The w distribution has only been characterized for a few populations (unpublished data), and no one to our knowledge has tested the effects of w distributions on individual reproductive decisions. For laboratory populations of flies and other organisms with short generation times and no sex biases in dispersal, it is relatively easy to estimate the shape of the w distribution, measuring fecundity, productivity, and offspring viability from a sample of random pairs breeding under enforced monogamy. An experiment that we plan to do will begin with flies cultured under inbreeding and outbreeding, which may produce w distributions with different shapes, and then to test the predictions (Fig. 11.7) for virgins (l = 0) when e, s, and n are held constant, using pretouching arenas.

Implications for Experimental Studies of Mate Preferences for Fancy Male Traits

The SPT is not a hypothesis for the evolution of fancy male traits, nor does it predict the evolution of traits mediating preferences. Nevertheless, the SPT suggests that selection should favor traits that increase a focal individual’s encounters with potential mates. Enhanced encounters increase reproductive opportunities, thereby reducing the opportunity costs of accepting potential mates who would confer low w. Traits, such as bizarre or easily seen plumage, loud calls, songs, or pheromones that travel over

Page
232
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Part I: NATURAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO NATURE (1-4)
1 Natural Selection inAction During Speciation--Sara Via (5-26)
2 Adaptive Radiations:From Field to Genomic Studies--Scott A. Hodges and Nathan J. Derieg (27-46)
3 Genetics and Ecological Speciation--Dolph Schluter and Gina L. Conte (47-64)
4 Cascades of Convergent Evolution: The Corresponding Evolutionary Histories of Euglenozoans and Dinoflagellates--Julius Lukeš, Brian S. Leander, and Patrick J. Keeling (65-84)
Part II: ARTIFICIAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO HUMAN DEMANDS (85-88)
5 From Wild Animals to Domestic Pets, an Evolutionary View of Domestication--Carlos A. Driscoll, David W. Macdonald, and Stephen J. O'Brien (89-110)
6 Tracking Footprints of Maize Domestication and Evidence for a Massive Selective Sweep on Chromosome 10--Feng Tian, Natalie M. Stevens, and Edward S. Buckler IV (111-128)
7 Human-Induced Evolution Caused by Unnatural Selection Through Harvest of Wild Animals--Fred W. Allendorf and Jeffrey J. Hard (129-148)
8 In the Light of Directed Evolution: Pathways of Adaptive Protein Evolution--Jesse D. Bloom and Frances H. Arnold (149-164)
Part III: SEXUAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO MATING DEMANDS (165-168)
9 Mate Choice and Sexual Selection: What Have We Learned Since Darwin?--Adam G. Jones and Nicholas L. Ratterman (169-190)
10 Sexual Selection and Mating Systems--Stephen M. Shuster (191-212)
11 Reproductive Decisions Under Ecological Constraints: It's About Time--Patricia Adair Gowaty and Stephen P. Hubbell (213-242)
12 Postcopulatory Sexual Selection: Darwin's Omission and Its Consequences--William G. Eberhard (243-262)
Part IV: THE DARWINIAN LEGACY, 150 YEARS LATER (263-266)
13 Darwin and the Scientific Method--Francisco J. Ayala (267-286)
14 The Darwinian Revolution: Rethinking Its Meaningand Significance--Michael Ruse (287-306)
15 Did Darwin Write *the Origin* Backwards?--Elliott Sober (307-328)
16 Darwin's Place in the History of Thought: A Reevaluation--Robert J. Richards (329-342)
17 Darwin's "Strange Inversion of Reasoning"--Daniel Dennett (343-354)
References (355-398)
Index (399-414)