National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin (2009)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)

Citation Manager

. "4 Cascades of Convergent Evolution: The Corresponding Evolutionary Histories of Euglenozoans and Dinoflagellates--Julius Lukeš, Brian S. Leander, and Patrick J. Keeling ." In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
78
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


In the Light of Evolution Volume III: Two Centuries of Darwin

Interestingly, the system used to target proteins to 3 membrane plastids is also different in subtle but important ways to that of canonical secondary plastids with 4 enveloping membranes, and the same variations have been adopted in dinoflagellates and euglenophytes. The N-terminal leaders that direct proteins to canonical secondary plastids include a signal peptide (to enter the endomembrane system) and a transit peptide (to cross the 2 plastid membranes), and are similar in secondarily derived red and green plastids. In dinoflagellates and euglenophytes, however, an additional hydrophobic domain is found following the transit peptide of some, but intriguingly not all, proteins (Patron et al., 2005; Durnford and Gray, 2006). This domain is thought to anchor the proteins in the endomembrane, so as the protein moves through the Golgi apparatus the leader lays in the lumen but the mature protein remains in the cytosol (Sulli et al., 1999; Nassoury et al., 2003). The number of membranes and these unusual characteristics of targeting have both evolved convergently in dinoflagellates and euglenophytes, which suggests some link in how these 2 features evolved. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which proteins cross the membrane that is missing in both dinoflagellates and euglenophytes (the plasma membrane of the engulfed alga) is the most poorly understood step in the targeting pathway to canonical secondary plastids, so any specific model for preconditioning would be highly speculative.

THE MITOCHONDRION: RNA EDITING AND GENOME BREAKDOWN

The mitochondrial genomes of dinoflagellates and kinetoplastids are both highly unorthodox, and once again have evolved some unique features and several common complex characteristics. The kinetoplastid mitochondrion contains uniquely structured, protein-rich mitochondrial ribosomes with a reduced RNA component, unusual fatty acid synthesis and respiratory complexes such as the prokaryotic-like complex I, alternative terminal oxidase, massive tRNA import, and incomplete Krebs cycle. The complex genome of the kinetoplastid mitochondrion is known as kinetoplast DNA or kDNA, its genes being subjected to unprecedented levels of RNA editing (Fig. 4.4) (Lukeš et al., 2005). Dinoflagellate mitochondria have received far less attention, but it is now emerging that their genomes have also evolved a number of highly unusual characteristics, including trans-splicing, tRNA import, fragmented rRNAs, the loss of start and stop codons, and an oligouridine tail (Slamovits et al., 2007; Nash et al., 2008). Most strikingly, however, the structure of dinoflagellate mitochondrial genomes has also broken down into many fragments, the transcripts of which have high levels of RNA editing; however, as we discuss below, the details of both systems differ between kinetoplastids and dinoflagellates (Fig. 4.4).

Page
78
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Part I: NATURAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO NATURE (1-4)
1 Natural Selection inAction During Speciation--Sara Via (5-26)
2 Adaptive Radiations:From Field to Genomic Studies--Scott A. Hodges and Nathan J. Derieg (27-46)
3 Genetics and Ecological Speciation--Dolph Schluter and Gina L. Conte (47-64)
4 Cascades of Convergent Evolution: The Corresponding Evolutionary Histories of Euglenozoans and Dinoflagellates--Julius Lukeš, Brian S. Leander, and Patrick J. Keeling (65-84)
Part II: ARTIFICIAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO HUMAN DEMANDS (85-88)
5 From Wild Animals to Domestic Pets, an Evolutionary View of Domestication--Carlos A. Driscoll, David W. Macdonald, and Stephen J. O'Brien (89-110)
6 Tracking Footprints of Maize Domestication and Evidence for a Massive Selective Sweep on Chromosome 10--Feng Tian, Natalie M. Stevens, and Edward S. Buckler IV (111-128)
7 Human-Induced Evolution Caused by Unnatural Selection Through Harvest of Wild Animals--Fred W. Allendorf and Jeffrey J. Hard (129-148)
8 In the Light of Directed Evolution: Pathways of Adaptive Protein Evolution--Jesse D. Bloom and Frances H. Arnold (149-164)
Part III: SEXUAL SELECTION, OR ADAPTATION TO MATING DEMANDS (165-168)
9 Mate Choice and Sexual Selection: What Have We Learned Since Darwin?--Adam G. Jones and Nicholas L. Ratterman (169-190)
10 Sexual Selection and Mating Systems--Stephen M. Shuster (191-212)
11 Reproductive Decisions Under Ecological Constraints: It's About Time--Patricia Adair Gowaty and Stephen P. Hubbell (213-242)
12 Postcopulatory Sexual Selection: Darwin's Omission and Its Consequences--William G. Eberhard (243-262)
Part IV: THE DARWINIAN LEGACY, 150 YEARS LATER (263-266)
13 Darwin and the Scientific Method--Francisco J. Ayala (267-286)
14 The Darwinian Revolution: Rethinking Its Meaningand Significance--Michael Ruse (287-306)
15 Did Darwin Write *the Origin* Backwards?--Elliott Sober (307-328)
16 Darwin's Place in the History of Thought: A Reevaluation--Robert J. Richards (329-342)
17 Darwin's "Strange Inversion of Reasoning"--Daniel Dennett (343-354)
References (355-398)
Index (399-414)