National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of the DOE National Security Labs' Use of Archival Nuclear Test Data: Letter Report (QMU Phase II) (2009)

Chapter: Appendix A – Underground Nuclear Test Diagnostics

« Previous: Letter Report
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Underground Nuclear Test Diagnostics." National Research Council. 2009. Review of the DOE National Security Labs' Use of Archival Nuclear Test Data: Letter Report (QMU Phase II). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12712.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Underground Nuclear Test Diagnostics." National Research Council. 2009. Review of the DOE National Security Labs' Use of Archival Nuclear Test Data: Letter Report (QMU Phase II). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12712.
×
Page 12

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix A – Underground Nuclear Test Diagnostics This section briefly summarizes the diagnostic methods used for underground nuclear tests that produced the bulk of the archival data 7 . Two classes of diagnostics are covered: prompt diagnostics and radiochemistry. Prompt diagnostics as the name implies measure the immediate behavior of the nuclear weapons at the time of the explosion. They monitor the gamma ray, neutron, and X-ray flux produced by the nuclear reactions within the primary and secondary of the tested weapon. Three different measurements are considered here: reaction history, neutron flux (NUEX and PINEX), and neutron output from the DT fusion reactions (THREX).  Reaction history diagnostics monitor the gamma ray flux arising from fission or the interaction of neutrons with other elements. The time history of these data provides a measure of alpha, the quantity that characterizes the criticality of the weapon and other important aspects of weapon performance.  NUEX (neutron experiment) measures neutron output over time, which provides a time-of-flight inference as to the energy of the escaping neutrons in the field of view. A variation of this diagnostic is PINEX (pinhole camera experiment) which produces an image of neutron or gamma ray flux from a specific region of the device. PINEX can also be gated to provide a measure of neutron flux at particular energy levels. Usually the gates are set to observe 14 MeV neutrons so that the location and intensity of the DT reactions in the device can be determined.  THREX (threshold experiment) measures neutron output from DT reactions over time. The DT reactions produce 14 MeV neutrons and some of these escape the device and are detected by the THREX sensors. The neutron production rate is temperature dependent so this measurement can be used to infer the temperature of the reacting DT source. Radiochemistry measures the products of nuclear fission and reactions of the neutrons emitted from the device. lt differs from prompt diagnostics in that radiochemical data are not collected at the time of the explosion. Radiochemical tracers are placed at various locations in the device and recovered, along with samples of actinides and fission products, from core samples from the bomb residue after the test. Radiochemistry provides the most accurate means of measuring weapon yield.  The neutron flux from the explosion causes different radioisotopes to form from the original tracers. These radioisotopes have long decay times compared to the time needed to recover the tracers after the explosion. The recovered tracers then undergo chemical analysis to determine the relative abundance of the radioisotopes. Changes in this quantity, as a result of the explosion, give a measure of the time-integrated neutron flux at the original position of the 7  F.N. Mortensen, J.M. Scott, and S.A. Colgate, How Archival Test Data Contribute to Certification, Los Alamos Science 2 8(2003): 38-46. 11

radiochemical tracer.  A related diagnostic is the change in the ratio of plutonium isotopes as a result of the explosion. This ratio depends on the number of fission, capture, and (n, 2n) reactions that take place. lt informs inferences of efficiency (mass fission/total mass) and boost performance. 12

Next: APPENDIX B – COMMITTEE ON EVALUATION OF QUANTIFICATION OF MARGINS AND UNCERTAINTIES METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING AND CERTIFYING THE RELIABILITY OF THE NUCLEAR STOCKPILE ARCHIVAL DATA LETTER REPORT »
Review of the DOE National Security Labs' Use of Archival Nuclear Test Data: Letter Report (QMU Phase II) Get This Book
×
 Review of the DOE National Security Labs' Use of Archival Nuclear Test Data: Letter Report (QMU Phase II)
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 2006, the U.S. Congress and the National Nuclear Security Administration of the Department of Energy requested an evaluation of the quantification of margins and uncertainties framework used by the national security laboratories in support of their nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship activities.

The first part of the request resulted in the book, Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. The present letter report fulfills the second part of that request: a high-level overview of the way the archival underground nuclear test data are used by the labs in its application of QMU. Specifically the committee was asked to assess how archived data are used in the evaluation of margins and uncertainties, and whether or not design labs are fully exploiting the data for QMU. This includes use for baselining codes, informing annual assessment, assessing significant finding investigations, and more.

This letter report presents the results of the study committee's analysis based on two meetings-one to Los Alamos National Laboratory and another to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The report begins with a short background section followed by the findings, recommendations, and analysis.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!