Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 129
Opening Remarks
Senator Mark Udall (D-Colorado)
Senator Udall, who described himself as a long-time proponent of the ex -
panded use of photovoltaic technologies, began by observing that his family
used a 3.5-kilowatt PV system to generate electricity for their house in Boulder,
Colorado, and that collectively such systems “can make a difference” in meet-
ing the nation’s energy demands. He said that a major part of his responsibility
in the Congress this year would be to move a comprehensive energy package
to the President’s desk. “We are in the 21st century,” he said, “and we need a
21st-century energy policy.” He noted that the nation would have to accelerate
its transition away from a fossil-fuel based economy, and would have to move
quickly and with some focus. “There is no silver bullet for doing this. Maybe
silver buckshot—with a lot of ways we can hit the target. In many parts of the
country,” he said, “solar is going to play a key role.”
He listed some advantages of more widespread use of solar technologies,
including the potential for new economic opportunities and improved national
security. For the economy, he said, solar energy would be able to create “mil -
lions” of new jobs and provide a key pillar of the economy for the 21st century.
Solar energy would spur innovation, he said, and create “a pathway whereby
we’re producing clean energy in our country.”
He emphasized that despite the apparent advantages of solar energy, persis-
tent hard work and effective communication are required to convince people of
the advantages of PV. Senator Udall noted that in his home state of Colorado, he
and other supporters of PV had struggled for years to pass a renewable energy
standard (RES), but succeeded only after years of debate over both substance and
129
OCR for page 130
130 FUTURE OF PHOTOVOLTAICS MANUFACTURING
language.3 When he was first elected to the state legislature in 1997, he said, each
legislator could introduce only five bills per term. He introduced a measure for
consumer disclosure on energy use, a net metering bill, and an RES bill. When
he first tried to gain approval for his RES bill from the 11-member committee,
he won only two votes, in face of strong opposition from utility and fossil fuel
companies.
A RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD FOR COLORADO
Senator Udall tried several more times, but the bill always fell short. In 2004,
however, he and a Republican colleague framed the measure as a ballot initiative
rather than a legislative bill, and traveled the state making the case for renewable
energy. Their measure became the first voter-approved RES. It proposed the mod-
est goal of producing 10 percent of the state’s electricity from renewable sources
by the year 2015, including a 4 percent portion for solar energy. The state reached
that target in just a few years. The legislature then reconsidered its position and
passed a bill calling for a 20 percent standard by 2020. Since the RES was passed,
he said, the Colorado Solar Energy Industries Association had identified at least
1,500 new jobs created in solar energy industries.
Senator Udall conceded that this success had come in just one state and only
after years of hard work. However, he had now transferred his effort to Washing -
ton, where he had been leading the fight for an RES bill in both the House and
Senate. “I don’t think the RES we’ll pass initially will be as strong as I’d like,” he
said, “but it will be a big step. And I think the states will buy the idea of setting
that kind of goal, which Americans are good at doing when we focus.”
PV AS A NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE
Senator Udall said that a second reason to pass clean energy legislation was
the benefit of renewable energy for national security. From his perspective as a
member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he said, he saw the advantage
of reducing the country’s dependence on foreign oil. “We have to keep remind-
ing ourselves,” he said, “that this is a critical step.” He emphasized American
petroleum dependence on Russia, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, and
other countries. He also noted the “huge amount of resources” in time, energy,
and opportunity costs that the country spends in defending its petroleum supply
lines worldwide. He also described “a more direct tie to our national security”
in the form of the daily stresses faced by the troops themselves in procuring and
transporting the fuel and water they need daily. He said that attacks on American
3 A renewable energy standard is a regulation that requires the increased production of energy from
renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal sources. About half the states
have implemented an RES, as have Britain, Italy, and Belgium.
OCR for page 131
131
OPENING REMARKS
troops in Iraq and Afghanistan often occur in convoy settings when the military
is moving fuel supplies and other resources to the troops. The military itself is
working hard on PV research, already issuing small solar panels, because they
represent a distributed form of energy and hence do not have the same protection
challenges in the battlefield. “The military knows better than any institution the
need for clean energy supplies,” he said.
Despite the advantages of renewable energy, he said, sustained local, state,
and federal efforts are required to transform the nation’s energy industry. He of -
fered a quote from Ernest Moniz, professor of physics at the Massachusetts Insti -
tute of Technology and former Under Secretary of Energy: “The energy industry
is a multitrillion-dollar-per-year, highly capitalized commodity business—with
exquisite supply chains, providing essential services at all levels of society. This
leads to a system with considerable inertia, aversion to risk, extensive regulation,
and complex politics.” To change this system, said Senator Udall, would require
innovative structures, such as partnerships that were designed to perform research
more efficiently, lower manufacturing costs, and help solar companies across the
financial “valley of death” between the laboratory and the marketplace. Other
industries had done this, he said, and provided models and analogs that could
now be useful for the PV industry. One kind of model is SEMATECH, he said,
which supports the semiconductor industry. Another is the Colorado Renewable
Energy Collaboratory, a research consortium of universities (the Colorado School
of Mines, Colorado State University, and the University of Colorado at Boulder)
and government (the National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]). The new
collaboratory, created by the state legislature, works with private sector groups
and draws on other universities and community colleges. “Anything goes,” he
said, “as long as it is improving energy efficiency.”
He closed with the admonition that many other nations are working as hard
as they can to gain an economic and technical edge in renewable energy. As an
example, he cited the French minister of sustainable development’s recent com-
ment that a new French solar manufacturing project would act as a magnet to
attract further solar investments and green jobs to France.
“I know we can compete,” he concluded, “and we want the clean energy
manufacturing base to be here in the United States. We want to sell the technol-
ogy to other countries, not vice versa. We can’t do anything more patriotic than
driving the manufacturing, the products, and the leadership role of this new clean
energy space.”
