National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$41.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Improving the Measurement of Late-Life Disability in Population Surveys: Beyond ADLs and IADLs: Summary of a Workshop (2009)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)
Committee on Population (CPOP)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix A: Population Survey Measures of Functioning: Strengths and Weaknesses--Barbara M. Altman." Improving the Measurement of Late-Life Disability in Population Surveys: Beyond ADLs and IADLs: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
156
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Improving the Measurement of Late-Life Disability in Population Surveys: Beyond ADLs and IADLs - Summary of a Workshop

Nagi, S. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and Rehabilitation (pp. 100–113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

Nagi, S. (1969). Disability and Rehabilitation: Legal, Clinical, and Self-Concepts and Measurement. Columbus: Ohio University Press.

Nagi, S. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In Institute of Medicine, Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (pp. 309–327). Committee on a National Agenda for the Prevention of Disabilities. A.M. Pope and A.R. Tarlov (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Center for Health Statistics. (1959). Impairments by Type, Sex, and Age. (National Health Interview Survey.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

National Council on Disability. (2008). Keeping Track: National Disability Status and Program Performance Indicators. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2008/pdf/Indicators_Report.pdf [accessed May 2008].

Newcomer, R., Kang, T., LaPlante, M., and Kaye, S. (2005). Living quarters and unmet personal care assistance among adults with disabilities. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 60B(4): S205–S213.

Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the general concepts of action and ability. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 11(2):144–152.

Nordenfelt, L. (2003). Disability, action theory and ICF. Newsletter on the World Health Organization Family of International Classifications 1(1):13–15.

Perrott, G., Tibbitts, C., and Britten, R. (1939). The National Health Survey: Scope and Method of the Nation-Wide Canvas of Sickness in Relation to Its Social and Economics Setting. Washington, DC: U.S. Public Health Service.

Rasch, E., Hochberg, M., Magder, L., Magaziner, J., and Altman, B.M. (2008). Health of community-dwelling adults with mobility limitations in the United States: Incidence of secondary health conditions. Part II. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89:219–230.

Silverstein, R., Julnes, G., and Nolan, R. (2005). What policy makers need and must demand from research regarding the employment rate of persons with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23:399–448.

Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton (Eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp. 38–57). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Verbrugge, L.M., and Jette, A.M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine 38:1–14.

Whiteneck, G. (2006). Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, and future. In Institute of Medicine, Disability in America: A New Look. Summary and Background Papers (pp. 50–66). M.J. Field, A.M. Jette, and L. Martin (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Wolf, D.A., Mendes de Leon, C.F., and Glass, T.A. (2007). Trends in rates of onset of and recovery from disability in older ages: 1982–1994. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 62B(1):S3–S10.

Wolinsky, F.D., Miller, D.K., Andresen, E.M., Malmstrom, T.K., and Miller, J.P. (2005). Further evidence for the importance of subclinical functional limitation and subclinical disability assessment in gerontology and geriatrics. Journal of Gerontology, Social Sciences 60B(3):S146–S151.

World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2001a). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Page
156