TABLE 2-1 Results of Surveys of American Participants in COBASE Program (percent)

Outcome of exchange program

Survey year

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

Partners still in contact

95

94

95

American had publication or presentation based on program

69

67

58

American applied for follow-on grant

52

67

56

American received follow-on grant

24

33

28

NOTE: Surveys were conducted one year after completion of individual programs. Although these data cover exchanges involving countries throughout Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, the results were comparable for exchanges involving only Eastern European scientists.

SOURCE: COBASE program data. Reprinted from Schweitzer, Glenn E. 2004. Scientists, Engineers, and Track-Two Diplomacy: A Half-Century of U.S.-Russian Interacademy Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

of scientists on both sides of the ocean to participate. As the region opened its remaining closed doors during the early 1990s, the contacts being established through the program helped many isolated Eastern European scientists link more fully into the international scientific community. Then, with the expansion of other international programs, particularly those sponsored by the European Union, the impact of the smaller efforts of COBASE began to diminish.

Finally, in the early 2000s, NSF terminated its regionally oriented activities as it decided to deemphasize programs targeted on specific geographical regions as previously noted. The evaluations by NSF of the effectiveness of the interacademy program were at the highest level. But NSF apparently considered that its resources could be more effectively used in a different manner without the need for the NAS as an intermediary.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement