National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory: Fiscal Year 2009. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12769.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory: Fiscal Year 2009. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12769.
×
Page 2

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Summary Overall, the Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory (CSTL) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is meeting its obligations, objectives, and desired impacts, and its priorities are appropriate and aligned with NIST’s mission and priorities. The technical merit of the laboratory and the commitment of the staff are high. There is no evidence that any programs are jeopardized by a lack of facilities or equipment, and ongoing and planned new facility construction should greatly improve CSTL capabilities. The National Research Council’s Panel on Chemical Science and Technology has the following comments about the operation of the laboratory within this framework of CSTL’s clear and consistent success and high technical merit. 1. The panel highlights the importance of having a CSTL strategic plan, involving all divisions and geographical locations, including a roadmap for progress, and commends the CSTL’s efforts in developing one. 2. It is important for the CSTL to have a methodology and program for evaluating projects with respect to their contribution to the CSTL and NIST missions. This approach will facilitate the elimination of programs when they are no longer effective in meeting desired goals. The project prioritization process adopted by the CSTL is a positive step, and the panel looks forward to the execution of the process. 3. Because of stable core funding, the CSTL does well with long-term programs that are aligned with the NIST mission. 4. Greater external visibility of the professional staff and their nomination for external awards should be emphasized more; a committee to nominate staff for external awards would help in this regard. 5. The CSTL should continue to emphasize the importance of its staff publishing in high-impact, refereed journals and giving invited talks. If these factors are to be used as performance standards and metrics, they and all other standards and metrics should be clearly communicated to the staff. 6. Information technology problems related to system shutdowns and independent database development within CSTL divisions should be addressed. A policy change at the NIST level is required. 7. Biological topics are becoming an increasing theme at the CSTL and NIST levels. The following are factors that the CSTL should consider in going forward: A. How will the CSTL prioritize the participation of the divisions, especially with respect to hiring decisions? B. What is the leadership role of the Biochemical Science Division? C. How will the CSTL coordinate its activities throughout its divisions and with other laboratories in NIST? D. How will the CSTL strategically partner with agencies and institutions outside NIST? How will workshops be a part of this partnering? E. Measurements and standards are NIST’s niche in this area. 1

8. With respect to intellectual property, a consistent policy on disclosures, copyrighting, and marketing is needed at the NIST level; this policy must be disseminated throughout the organization. 9. Joint appointments of professional staff to two separate divisions within the CSTL would provide more flexibility in adding personnel in high-priority areas and would enhance interdisciplinary activities. Joint appointments with institutions outside NIST would also add to interdisciplinary capabilities. 10. The CSTL should examine the balance of technicians versus PhD scientists to ensure that the scientists’ time is used most productively and efficiently. The addition of a few technicians might greatly improve the productivity and efficiency of the entire technical staff. 11. The Process Measurements Division has been successful in automating its Thermometry Laboratory, with impressive results. This effort could serve as a model for automating other measurement laboratories that conduct repetitive tasks which must be done in a particular way. 12. The CSTL should continue to seek, and should act on opportunities to lead in, collaborative activities in areas where it has strong expertise and where it has equipment available for use. 13. The CSTL should consider and investigate media opportunities to publicize the usefulness of its capabilities. The panel thinks that more potential users of NIST services and products would come forward if they knew more about what NIST has to offer. 2

Next: 1 The Charge to the Panel and the Assessment Process »
An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory: Fiscal Year 2009 Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory examines the operations of the Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory (CSTL) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

This book assesses the CSTL, based on the following criteria: (1) the technical merit of the current laboratory programs relative to current state-of-the-art programs worldwide; (2) the adequacy of the laboratory budget, facilities, equipment, and human resources, as they affect the quality of the laboratory's technical programs; and (3) the degree to which laboratory programs in measurement science and standards achieve their stated objectives and desired impact."

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!