The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Data on Federal Research and Development Investments: A Pathway to Modernization
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005). Improvements Needed to the Federal Procurement Data System—Next Generation. GAO-05-960R, September 27. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05960r.pdf [accessed November 2009].
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1978). Directive No. 16, Standard Classification ofFields of Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2002). Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizingthe Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by FederalAgencies. Notice: Re-publication. February 22. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2006). OMB Guidance on Data Submission underthe Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Transparency Act). M-08-04, November 9. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget and Office of Science and Technology Policy (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. Science and Technology Priorities for the FY 2011 Budget. M-09-27, August 4. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09-27.pdf [accessed November 2009].
Van Raan, A.F.J. (1996). The interdisciplinary nature of science: Theoretical framework and ibliometric-empirical approach. In P. Weingart and N. Stehr, Eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 66-78). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Wagner, C., and L. Leydesforff (2005). Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10):1608-1618.
Yasitis, A., S. Zecher, S. Shackleford, and E. Kim (2004). Interdisciplinary Research FundingPatterns: An Analysis of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes ofHealth, and the Department of Energy. Policy Analysis Workshop, Georgia Institute of Technology, November 14.