U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005). Improvements Needed to the Federal Procurement Data System—Next Generation. GAO-05-960R, September 27. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05960r.pdf [accessed November 2009].

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1978). Directive No. 16, Standard Classification of Fields of Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2002). Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies. Notice: Re-publication. February 22. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2006). OMB Guidance on Data Submission under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Transparency Act). M-08-04, November 9. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget and Office of Science and Technology Policy (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. Science and Technology Priorities for the FY 2011 Budget. M-09-27, August 4. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09-27.pdf [accessed November 2009].

Van Raan, A.F.J. (1996). The interdisciplinary nature of science: Theoretical framework and ibliometric-empirical approach. In P. Weingart and N. Stehr, Eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 66-78). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Wagner, C., and L. Leydesforff (2005). Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10):1608-1618.

Yasitis, A., S. Zecher, S. Shackleford, and E. Kim (2004). Interdisciplinary Research Funding Patterns: An Analysis of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy. Policy Analysis Workshop, Georgia Institute of Technology, November 14.