The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change
CBO. 2009. The Economic Effects of Legislation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Washington, DC: CBO.
CEA (Council of Economic Advisors). 2009. Economic Report of the President. Prepared by the Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.
Chamberlain, A. 2009. Who Pays for Climate Policy? New Estimates of the Household Burden and Economic Impact of a U.S.Cap-and-Trade System. Washington, DC: Tax Foundation.
Clarke, L., J. Edmonds, V. Krey, R. Richels, S. Rose, and M. Tavoni. 2009. International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Economics 31(Suppl 2):S64-S81.
Clarke, L. E. 2007. Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations. Washington, DC: U.S. Climate Change Science Program.
Cohen, L. R., and R. G. Noll. 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Committee on Climate Change. 2009. Building a Low-Carbon Economy: The UK’s Contribution to Tackling Climate Change. London: The Stationery Office.
Conant, R. T., and K. Paustian. 2002. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in grasslands: Implications for detecting change at different scales. Environmental Pollution 116(Suppl 1):S127-S135.
Cory, K. S., and B. G. Swezey. 2007. Renewable Portfolio Standards in the States Balancing Goals and Implementation Strategies. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Coyle, K. 2005. Environmental Literacy in America: What Ten Years of NEETF/Roper Research and Related Studies Say AboutEnvironmental Literacy in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.
Craford, M. G. 2008. High power LEDs for solid state lighting: Status, trends, and challenges. Journal of Light and VisualEnvironment 32(2):58-62.
CSPO and CATF (Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes and Clean Air Task Force). 2009. Innovation Policy for ClimateChange: A Report to the Nation. Joint project of the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes and Clean Air Task Force, Boston, MA.
Curry, T., S. Ansolabehere, and H. Herzog. 2007. A Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Climate Change and Climate ChangeMitigation Technologies in the United States: Analyses of 2006 Results. Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
de la Chesnaye, F., and J. Weyant (eds). 2006. Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. The Energy Journal, Special Issue.
de la Chesnaye, F. C., C. Delhotal, B. Deangelo, D. Ottinger-Schaefer, and D. Godwin. 2007. Past, present, and future of non-CO2 gas mitigation analysis. In Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, M. E. Schlesinger, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dewar, M. E. 1998. Why state and local economic development programs cause so little economic development. EconomicDevelopment Quarterly 12(1):68-87.
Dietz, T., G. T. Gardner, J. Gilligan, P. C. Stern, and M. P. Vandenbergh. 2009. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:18452-18456.
Dinan, T., and D. L. Rogers. 2002. Distributional effects of carbon allowance trading: How government decisions determine winners and losers. National Tax Journal 55(2):199-221.
Dinan, T. M. 2009. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with a tax or a cap: Implications for efficiency and cost effectiveness. National Tax Journal 62:535-553.