APPENDIX G

(From FSIS Directive 8010.1, Revision 2)


In determining whether to identify a person or firm for a followup surveillance review and the period within which to conduct the followup review, Investigators are to consider:

  1. The firm type (i.e., business type) and ICS tier;

  2. Whether the person or firm is operating under, and in compliance with, an administrative order, court order, or other binding case disposition terms;

  3. Surveillance review findings, including, but not limited to, the following:

    1. whether products are found to be wholesome and not adulterated;

    2. whether sanitary conditions are such that products would not become contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health;

    3. whether hazard controls are adequate to prevent products from becoming adulterated;

    4. whether products not intended for use as human food are being properly denatured or otherwise made inedible; and

    5. whether records are being maintained in compliance with agency requirements.

  1. Whether the Investigator documented an apparent violation(s) of the FMIA, PPIA, EPIA;

  2. Whether the Investigator initiated a product control action(s); and

  3. The person or firm’s compliance history.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 34
APPENDIX G (From FSIS Directive 8010.1, Revision 2) In determining whether to identify a person or firm for a followup surveillance review and the period within which to conduct the followup review, Investigators are to consider: 1. The firm type (i.e., business type) and ICS tier; 2. Whether the person or firm is operating under, and in compliance with, an administrative order, court order, or other binding case disposition terms; 3. Surveillance review findings, including, but not limited to, the following: a. whether products are found to be wholesome and not adulterated; b. whether sanitary conditions are such that products would not become contaminated with filth or rendered injurious to health; c. whether hazard controls are adequate to prevent products from becoming adulterated; d. whether products not intended for use as human food are being properly denatured or otherwise made inedible; and e. whether records are being maintained in compliance with agency requirements. 4. Whether the Investigator documented an apparent violation(s) of the FMIA, PPIA, EPIA; 5. Whether the Investigator initiated a product control action(s); and 6. The person or firm’s compliance history. 34