Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$32.50 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles State Voter Registration Databases: Immediate Actions and Future Improvements, Interim Report Asking the Right Questions About Electronic Voting Other Related Titles Improving State Voter Registration Databases: Final Report (2010) Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "7 Conclusion." Improving State Voter Registration Databases: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010. Please select a format: Page 55   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. 7 Conclusion In the years since HAVA mandated the nationwide adoption of statewide VRDs, the states have been largely successful in deploying their initial VRD implementations. Nevertheless, there are a number of immediate opportunities for states to improve the operation of their VRD systems. In addition, if the promise of statewide VRDs for improving voter registration is to be realized, the states will have to address some longer-term issues. These issues can be successfully addressed only with coordinated, concerted, and sustained support for continuing improvement on the part of many parties, including state election officials, nonelection state and local agencies, state legislatures, voter advocacy groups, and the federal government. Page 55 Front Matter (R1-R12) Summary (1-4) 1 The Context for Voter Registration (5-6) 2 Key Processes for Voter Registration Databases (7-16) 3 Technical Considerations for Voter Registration Databases (17-29) 4 Sustainability and Long-Term Funding (30-32) 5 Actions Possible in a Relatively Short Time Frame (33-39) 6 Possible Future Improvements That Will Require Longer-Term Action (40-54) 7 Conclusion (55-56) Appendixes (57-58) Appendix A: Background and Context (59-64) Appendix B: Matching Records Across Databases (65-78) Appendix C: Data Issues (79-86) Appendix D: Security and Privacy (87-95) Appendix E: Workshop Agendas (96-111) Appendix F: Biographical Information (112-116)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 55
Improving State Voter Registration Databases: Final Report 7 Conclusion In the years since HAVA mandated the nationwide adoption of statewide VRDs, the states have been largely successful in deploying their initial VRD implementations. Nevertheless, there are a number of immediate opportunities for states to improve the operation of their VRD systems. In addition, if the promise of statewide VRDs for improving voter registration is to be realized, the states will have to address some longer-term issues. These issues can be successfully addressed only with coordinated, concerted, and sustained support for continuing improvement on the part of many parties, including state election officials, nonelection state and local agencies, state legislatures, voter advocacy groups, and the federal government.

OCR for page 56
Improving State Voter Registration Databases: Final Report This page intentionally left blank.