References

American Statistical Association. (2008). Data Access and Personal Privacy: Appropriate Methods of Disclosure Control. Available: http://www.amstat.org/news/statementondataaccess.cfm [accessed November 2009].

Cox, L.H. (2008). A data quality and data confidentiality assessment of complementary cell suppression. In J. Domingo-Ferrer and Y. Saygin (Eds.), Privacy in Statistical Data Bases 2008 (pp. 13-23). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5262. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Duncan, G., and Lambert, D. (1986). Disclosure-limited data dissemination (with comments). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 10-28.

Duncan, G., Keller-McNulty, S., and Stokes, S.L. (2001). Disclosure Risk vs. Data Utility: The R-U Confidentiality Map, Technical Report Number 121. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences.

Fienberg, S.E., and Slavkovic, A.B. (2004). Making the release of confidential data from multi-way tables count. Chance,17(3), 5-10.

Little, R. (1993). Statistical analysis of masked data. Journal of Official Statistics, 9(2), 407-426.

National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). NCHS Staff Manual on Confidentiality. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/staffmanual2004.pdf. [accessed June 2009].

National Science Foundation. (2009). Disclosure Protection Strategies for Race/Ethnicity/Gender (REG) Tables for the Survey of Earned Doctorates. Unpublished.

Office of Management and Budget. (2005). Report on Statistical Disclosure Limitation Methodology, Statistical Working Paper #22. Available: http://www.fcsm.gov/working-papers/SPWP22_rev.pdf [accessed November 2009].

Office of Management and Budget. (2006). Implementation Guidance for Title V of the E-Government Act, Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA). Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/omb/inforeg/proposed_cispea_guidance.pdf [accessed November 2009].



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 47
References American Statistical Association. (2008). Data Access and Personal Privacy: Appropriate Meth- ods of Disclosure Control. Available: http://www.amstat.org/news/statementondataaccess. cfm [accessed November 2009]. Cox, L.H. (2008). A data quality and data confidentiality assessment of complementary cell suppression. In J. Domingo-Ferrer and y. Saygin (Eds.), Privacy in Statistical Data Bases 00 (pp. 13-23). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5262. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Duncan, G., and Lambert, D. (1986). Disclosure-limited data dissemination (with com- ments). Journal of the American Statistical Association, , 10-28. Duncan, G., keller-McNulty, S., and Stokes, S.L. (2001). Disclosure Risk vs. Data Utility: The R-U Confidentiality Map, Technical Report Number 121. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences. Fienberg, S.E., and Slavkovic, A.B. (2004). Making the release of confidential data from multi-way tables count. Chance, 17(3), 5-10. Little, R. (1993). Statistical analysis of masked data. Journal of Official Statistics, (2), 407-426. National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). NCHS Staff Manual on Confidentiality. Avail- able: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/staffmanual2004.pdf. [accessed June 2009]. National Science Foundation. (2009). Disclosure Protection Strategies for Race/Ethnicity/Gender (REG) Tables for the Survey of Earned Doctorates. Unpublished. Office of Management and Budget. (2005). Report on Statistical Disclosure Limitation Methodology, Statistical Working Paper #22. Available: http://www.fcsm.gov/working- papers/SPWP22_rev.pdf [accessed November 2009]. Office of Management and Budget. (2006). Implementation Guidance for Title V of the E-Government Act, Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 00 (CIPSEA). Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/omb/inforeg/ proposed_cispea_guidance.pdf [accessed November 2009]. 

OCR for page 47
 IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF SESTAT quality Education for Minorities Network. (2009). Outreach Meetings to Provide Feedback to the National Science Foundation’s Science Resources Statistics (SRS) Division on the Impact of Data Suppression in the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) Reports. Available: http:// www.qem.org/SRS.htm [accessed November 2009]. Reiter, J. (2005). Using CART to generate partially synthetic public use microdata. Journal of Official Statistics, (3), 441-462. Simko, C., and Dominguez, M. (2008). Results from the Survey of Earned Doctorates User Group Web Survey. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. Skinner, C., and Shlomo, N. (2008). Assessing identification risk in survey micro-data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 0(483), 989-1001. Sweeney, L. (2002). k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 0(5), 557-570.