National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$85.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Domestic and International Impacts of the 2009-H1N1 Influenza A Pandemic: Global Challenges, Global Solutions: Workshop Summary (2010)
Board on Global Health (BGH)

Citation Manager

. "A2 Predicting Emerging Diseases in the Twenty-first Century: The Case of Zoonotic Influenza." The Domestic and International Impacts of the 2009-H1N1 Influenza A Pandemic: Global Challenges, Global Solutions: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
118
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Domestic and International Impacts of the 2009-H1N1 Influenza a Pandemic: Global Challenges, Global Solutions - Workshop Summary

gens impact the wide variety of hosts they can infect. This in turn will influence the potential for viral persistence and potentially spill over into humans.

Of the Anseriformes, the dabbling (or puddle) ducks have the greatest prevalence and mallards in particular have the highest prevalence (Olsen et al., 2006). The age structure of these populations is also important in that juvenile birds are more likely to have an infection than adults, and this likely is influenced by immunological status. Other migratory birds including the Charadriiformes (shorebirds, gulls, terns, and waders) can be infected but typically only at very low levels (Krauss et al., 2004; Olsen et al., 2006). However, this does not mean they are unimportant in the transmission cycle or maintenance of the virus. More intensive long-term data on how these viruses circulate and transmit between these birds are needed.

Finally, the potential for newly reassorted strains to emerge is probably heightened now because of the widespread circulation of 2009-H1N1 influenza A. We hope that our Fogarty International Center-funded program will both help identify the risk of co-infections (e.g., regions with high poultry and hog farm density) and actually find evidence in the testing that our groups will be doing. The recent report of hog farms in Indonesia with high prevalence of H5N1 (Cyranoski, 2005) and two very recent suspected cases of humans passing 2009-H1N1 influenza A onto hogs highlight this risk.

We conclude that there are a growing number of strategies being developed to predict the origin and spread of novel emerging pathogens. These strategies meld ecological, virological, and mathematical approaches to identify high-risk regions, activities, and behaviors, and they have some potential for prevention and control. At the same time, far more detailed and structured studies are needed to truly get to the underlying causes of zoonotic influenza emergence and help prevent the next human-to-human high-pathogenicity pandemic. To do these studies effectively will require some capital investment, likely within the range of a few tens of millions of dollars. However, we believe the potential reduction in pandemic risk would be a wise investment because the predicted pandemic mortality and associated economic costs are within the tens of billions of dollars (Meltzer et al., 1999).

References

Anderson, P. K., A. A. Cunningham, N. G. Patel, F. J. Morales, P. R. Epstein, and P. Daszak. 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19(10):535-544.

Boric, J. 2006. Investing in chicken, http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-chicken-2/ (accessed March 24, 2010.

Cox, N. J., and K. Subbarao. 2000. Global epidemiology of influenza: past and present. Annual Review of Medicine 51:407-421.

Cyranoski, D. 2005. Bird flu spreads among Java’s pigs. Nature 435(7041):390-391.

Page
118
Front Matter (R1-R22)
Workshop Overview (1-94)
Appendix A1 Technical Report for State and Local Public Health Officials and School Administrators on CDC Guidance for School (K-12) Responses to Influenza during the 2009-2010 School Year (95-110)
A2 Predicting Emerging Diseases in the Twenty-first Century: The Case of Zoonotic Influenza (111-119)
A3 The Spring 2009 Influenza A H1N1 Outbreak: A Local Public Health Perspective (120-136)
A4 I nternational Law and Equitable Access to Vaccines and Antivirals in the Context of 2009-H1N1 Influenza (137-154)
A5 In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of New Swine-Origin H1N1 Influenza Viruses (155-190)
A6 Estimation of the Reproductive Number and the Serial Interval in Early Phase of the 2009 Influenza A⁄H1N1 Pandemic in the USA (191-207)
A7 The Severity of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in the United States, from April to July 2009: A Bayesian Analysis (208-247)
A8 Hard Choices in Difficult Situations: Ethical Issues in Public Health Emergencies (248-268)
A9 Rumors of Pandemic: Monitoring Emerging Disease Outbreaks on the Internet (269-282)
A10 Preliminary Observation of the Epidemiology of Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in South Africa, 2009 (283-296)
A11 Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program (297-305)
A12 Southern Hemisphere, Northern Hemisphere: A Global Influenza World (306-326)
A13 Influenza (H1N1) Pandemic 2009 (327-341)
A14 Origins and Evolutionary Genomics of the 2009 Swine-Origin H1N1 Influenza A Epidemic (342-380)
Appendix B Agenda (381-385)
Appendix C Acronyms (386-388)
Appendix D Glossary (389-396)
Appendix E Forum Member Biographies (397-418)