Questions for Research
Summary of a Workshop
Stephen A. Merrill, Rapporteur
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Investor Exits, Innovation, and
Entrepreneurial Firm Growth
Questions for Research
Summary of a Workshop
Stephen A. Merrill, Rapporteur
Committee on Investor Exit Strategies and Entrepreneurial Firm Growth
Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy
Policy and Global Affairs
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS; 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of
the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National
Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The
members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences
and with regard for appropriate balance.
This study was supported by Grant No. 20070350 between the National Academy of Sciences
and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or
recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
This work/research was funded by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. The contents of this
publication are solely the responsibility of the grantee.
Limited copies are available from:
Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy
National Research Council
500 Fifth Street, N.W., Keck Center 574, Washington, D.C., 20001
Phone: (202) 334-2200
Fax: (202) 334-1505
E-mail: step@nas.edu
Copyright 2009 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars
engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their
use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy
has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J.
Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of
Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the
selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the
federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting
national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr.
Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of
eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the
public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional
charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care,
research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the
broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising
the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council
has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy
of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering
communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J.
Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
PLANNING COMMITTEE ON INVESTOR EXIT STRATEGIES AND
ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRM GROWTH
Timothy F. Bresnahan, Chair
Landau Professor in Technology and Economy
Stanford University
Lewis Coleman William R. Raduchel
President Independent Director and Investor
DreamWorks Animation
Josh Lerner J. Leighton Read
Jacob Schiff Professor of Investment Banking General Parnter
Harvard Business School Alloy Ventures
Harvard University
Edward E. Penhoet Susan E. Woodward
Director Principal
Alta Partners Sand Hill Econometrics, Inc.
PROJECT STAFF
Stephen A. Merrill
Study Director
Mahendra Shunmoogam1
Program Associate
Daniel Mullins2
Program Associate
Cynthia Getner
Financial Officer
1
Left the project in July 2008.
2
Started with the project on September 2008.
v
OCR for page R1
BOARD ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ECONOMIC POLICY
For the National Research Council (NRC), this project was overseen by the Board on
Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP), a standing board of the National
Research Council established by The National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and
the Institute of Medicine in 1991. The mandate of the STEP Board is to integrate
understanding of scientific, technological, and economic elements in the formulation of
national policies to promote the economic well-being of the United States. STEP bridges the
disciplines of business management, engineering, economics, and the social sciences to bring
diverse expertise to bear on important public policy questions. The members of the STEP
Board and the NRC staff are listed below.
Edward E. Penhoet
Chair
Director, Alta Partners
Lewis W. Coleman Joseph P. Newhouse
President John D. MacArthur Professor of Health Policy
DreamWorks Animation and Management
Director, Division of Health Policy Research
and Education
Ralph E. Gomory
Research Professor, Stern School of Business Harvard University
New York University
Arati Prabhakar
General Partner
Mary L. Good
Donaghey Professor and Dean U.S. Venture Partners
Donaghey College of Engineering & Information
Technology William J. Raduchel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Independent Director and Investor
Amory Houghton, Jr. Jack W. Schuler
Former Member of Congress Co-Founder
Crabtree Partners, LLC
William F. Meehan III
Lecturer in Strategic Management Alan Wm. Wolff
Stanford Graduate School of Business Partner
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
David T. Morgenthaler
Founding Partner
Morgenthaler Ventures
vi
OCR for page R1
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
Ralph J. Cicerone Charles M. Vest
President President
National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering
Harvey V. Fineberg
President
Institute of Medicine
STEP STAFF
Stephen A. Merrill Jeffrey McCullough
Executive Director Program Associate
Charles W. Wessner Adam Gertz
Program Director Program Associate
Sujai J. Shivakumar Daniel Mullins
Senior Program Officer Program Associate
David E. Dierksheide Cynthia A. Getner
Program Officer Financial Associate
McAlister Clabaugh
Program Officer
vii
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
Preface and Acknowledgments
In 2007 the National Academies’ Board on Science, Technology, and
Economic Policy (STEP) received funding from the Ewing Marion Kauffman
Foundation to hold a workshop to examine the marked change in exit strategies of
venture-backed U.S. firms coinciding with the dot-com crash of 2001. In that year
there was an abrupt and lasting shift away from taking firms public through initial
public offerings (IPOs) and toward mergers with established firms. There had been
much discussion of the causes, consequences, and policy implications of the change
in exit strategies but little systematic inquiry. The purpose of the workshop was not to
answer those questions but to explore the merits, feasibility, and possible directions of
research on these topics, in short, to provide guidance to researchers and research
sponsors.
A planning committee was appointed composed of Timothy Bresnahan, chair,
Stanford University economics department; Lewis Coleman, DreamWorks
Animation; Joshua Lerner, Harvard Business School; William Raduchel, independent
investor and director; Edward Penhoet, currently with Alta Partners and formerly of
the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Leighton Read, Alloy Ventures; and Susan
Woodward, SandHill Econometrics. Approximately 30 entrepreneurs, investors, and
academic experts in corporate finance, law, and venture economics attended the
meeting in Washington. An effort was made to select participants with
methodologically and theoretically diverse backgrounds. Future discussion of the
issues examined would benefit from additional perspectives, including historians of
markets and entrepreneurship, technology specialists, and students of social networks.
This document is a summary report of the discussions that took place at the
workshop. The committee’s role was limited to planning the meeting. As study
director I prepared this summary. The views expressed in the summary are those of
the speakers and discussants and are not the consensus views of participants, the
planning committee, the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, or the
National Academies. This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals
chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with
procedures approved by the National Academies’ Report Review Committee. The
ix
OCR for page R1
x PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that
will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to
ensure that the report meets institutional standards for quality and objectivity. The
review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of
the process.
We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Philip Auerswald, George Mason University; Amy Dittmar, University of Michigan;
Melissa Graebner, University of Texas, Austin; Mark Heesen, National Venture
Capital Association; William Janeway, Warburg Pincus, LLC; and Martin Kenney,
University of California.
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive
comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the report,
nor did they see the final draft before its release. Responsibility for the final content
of this report rests entirely with the author and the institution.
Finally, the National Academies and the STEP Board thank Dr. Robert Litan,
Vice President for Research and Policy of the Kauffman Foundation, for making the
workshop possible and for contributing significantly to the discussion.
Stephen A. Merrill, Study Director
OCR for page R1
Contents
Summary 1
1 Background of the Workshop 3
2 What are the facts? Do they Merit Analysis? 7
3 What are the Challenges and Hurdles to Research? 13
a. Accounting for Technology and Sector Differences 13
b. Accounting for “Demand” Side Factors 14
c. Difficulty of Distinguishing Policy Influences 15
d. Difficulty of Establishing Causal Linkages Generally 16
4 What Research Merits Consideration? 17
Appendixes
A Workshop Agenda 21
B Participants 23
xi
OCR for page R1