References

Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., and Sanders, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95-135.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.

Ballou, D. (2005). Value-added assessment: Lessons from Tennessee. In R.W. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and application (pp. 272-297). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.

Ballou, D. (2008). Value-added analysis: Issues in the economics literature. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.

Ballou, D., Sanders, W., and Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 37-65.

Braun, H. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer to value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Brennan, R.L., Yin, P., and Kane, M.T. (2003). Methodology for examining the reliability of group difference scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 207-230.

Briggs, D. (2008). The goals and uses of value-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.

Briggs, D.C., Weeks, J.P., and Wiley, E. (2008). The sensitivity of value-added modeling to the creation of a vertical score scale. Paper presented at the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 69
References Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., and Sanders, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Labor Economics, , 95-135. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and Na - tional Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors. Ballou, D. (2005). Value-added assessment: Lessons from Tennessee. In R.W. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and application (pp. 272-297). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press. Ballou, D. (2008). Value-added analysis: Issues in the economics literature. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improve - ment, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Ballou, D., Sanders, W., and Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value- added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behaioral Statistics, (1), 37-65. Braun, H. (2005). Using student progress to ealuate teachers: A primer to alue-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Brennan, R.L., Yin, P., and Kane, M.T. (2003). Methodology for examining the reliability of group difference scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 0, 207-230. Briggs, D. (2008). The goals and uses of alue-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_ Workshop_Agenda.html. Briggs, D.C., Weeks, J.P., and Wiley, E. (2008). The sensitiity of alue-added modeling to the creation of a ertical score scale. Paper presented at the National Conference on Value- Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24. 

OCR for page 69
0 GETTING VALUE OUT OF VALUE-ADDED California State Board of Education. (1997). Mathematics content standards for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twele. Sacramento: California Department of Education. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/mathstandard.pdf [accessed January 2009]. Center for Educator Compensation Reform. (no date). Teacher incentie grantee profiles. Avail- able: http://cecr.ed.gov/initiatives/grantees/profiles.cfm [accessed January 2009]. Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., and Vigdor, J.L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achieement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effect s. Working paper 13617. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Easton, J. (2008). Goals and aims of alue-added modeling: A Chicago perspectie. Paper pre- pared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instruc - tional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.national academies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Graham, S.E., Singer, J.D. and Willett, J.B. (in press). Longitudinal data analysis. In A. Maydeu-Olivares and R. Millsap (Eds.), Handbook of quantitatie methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hanushek, E. (1972). Education and race. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company. Harris, D.N., and Sass, T. (2005). Value-added models and the measurement of teacher quality. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Education Finance Associa - tion, Louisville, KY, March 17-19. Holland, P. (2002). Two measures of change in gaps between the CDFs of test score distribu - tions. Journal of Educational and Behaioral Statistics, (1), 3-17. Isenberg, E. (2008). Measuring teacher effectieness in Memphis. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. Jha, A.K. (2008). The impact of public reporting of quality of care: Two decades of U.S. experience. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, Na - tional Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7. nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Koedel, C., and Betts, J. (2009). Value-added to what? How a ceiling in the testing instrument influences alue-added estimation. Available: http://economics.missouri.edu/working- papers/koedelWP.shtml [accessed September 2009]. Ladd, H.F. (2008). Discussion of papers by Dale Ballou and by Daniel McCaffrey and J.R. Lockwood. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, Na - tional Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7. nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Linn, R.L. (1993). Linking results of district assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, , 83-102. Linn, R.L. (2008). Measurement issues associated with alue-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improve - ment, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Lockwood, J.R., and McCaffrey, D.F. (2007). Controlling for individual heterogeneity in longitudinal models, with applications to student achievement. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 1, 223-252 (electronic). DOI: 10.1214/07-EJS057. Lockwood, J.R., McCaffrey, D.F., Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B.M., Le, V., and Martinez F. (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, (1) 47-67.

OCR for page 69
 REFERENCES Martineau, J.A. (2006). Distorting value-added: The use of longitudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability. Journal of Educational and Behaioral Statistics, (1), 35-62. McCaffrey, D., and Lockwood, J.R. (2008). Value-added models: Analytic issues. Paper pre- pared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instruc - tional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.national academies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D.M., and Hamilton, L.S. (2003). Ealuating alue- added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. McCaffrey, D., Sass, T.R., and Lockwood, J.R. (2008). The intertemporal effect estimates. Paper presented at the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wis - consin-Madison, April 22-24. Mislevy, R.J. (1992). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues and prospects. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Murnane, R.J. (1975). The impact of school resources on the learning of inner city children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. National Research Council. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Committee on Appropriate Test Use. J.H. Heubert and R.M. Hauser (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behav- ioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. M.R. Wilson and M.W. Bertenthal (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2007a). Ready, set, SCIENCE!: Putting research to work in K- sci- ence classrooms. S. Michaels, A.W. Shouse, and H. A. Schweingruber. Center for Educa - tion, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2007b). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A.W. Shouse (Eds.). Center for Education, Divi- sion of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (in press). Incenties and test-based accountability in public educa- tion. Committee on Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Public Education. M. Hout, N. Chudowsky, and S. W. Elliott (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Measuring improements in learning outcomes: Best practices to assess the alue-added of schools. Paris: Author. Popham, W.J. (2007). Instructional insensitivity of tests: Accountability’s dire drawback. Phi Delta Kappan, (2), 146-150. Public Impact/Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2008). Ohio alue-added primer: A user’s guide. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Available: http://www.edexcellence. net/doc/Ohio_Value_Added_Primer_FINAL_small.pdf [accessed January 2009].

OCR for page 69
 GETTING VALUE OUT OF VALUE-ADDED Reardon, S., and Raudenbush, S.W. (2008). Assumptions of alue-added models for measuring school effects. Presented at the Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24. Reckase, M.D. (2008). Measurement issues associated with alue-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Re - search Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.national academies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Rogosa, D.R., and Willett, J.B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Measurement, 0, 335-343. Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in alue-added estimation: Selection on obserables and unobserables. Working Paper No. w14666. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Sanders, W., and Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assess - ment system (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Ealuation in Education, (3), 247-256. Sanders, W., and Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulatie and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achieement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Assess- ment Center. Available: http://www.cgp.upenn.edu/pdf/Sanders_Rivers-TVASS_ teacher%20effects.pdf [accessed June 2009]. Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R.T., and McKnight, C.C. (2005). Value-added research: Right idea but wrong solution? In R. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and ap- plications (Chapter 6). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press. Tong, Y., and Kolen, M.J. (2007). Comparisons of methodologies and results in vertical scaling for educational achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 0(2), 227-253. U.S. Department of Education. (2009, January 12). Growth models: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/ growthmodel/index.html [accessed June 2009]. Willett, J.B., and Singer, J.D. (in preparation). Applied multileel data analysis. Harvard Uni- versity, Cambridge, MA. Willms, J.D. (2008). Seen key issues for assessing “alue-added” in education. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Re - search Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.national academies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html. Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Ealuation in Education, (1), 57-67. Xu, Z., Hannaway, J., and Taylor, C. (2007). Making a difference? The effects of Teach For America in high school. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available: http://www.urban.org/ UploadedPDF/411642_Teach_America.pdf [accessed January 2009]. Young, M.J. (2006). Vertical scales. In S.M. Downing and T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test deelopment (pp. 469-485). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Zumbo, B.D., and Forer, B. (2008). Testing and measurement from a multileel iew: Psychometrics and alidation. In J. Bovaird, K. Geisinger, and C. Buckendahl (Eds.), High stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K- settings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press. Zurawsky, C. (2004). Teachers matter: Evidence from value-added assessment. Research Points: Essential Information for Educational Policy, (2).