Reardon, S., and Raudenbush, S.W. (2008). Assumptions of value-added models for measuring school effects. Presented at the Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24.

Reckase, M.D. (2008). Measurement issues associated with value-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.

Rogosa, D.R., and Willett, J.B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 335-343.

Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Working Paper No. w14666. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Sanders, W., and Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247-256.

Sanders, W., and Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Assessment Center. Available: http://www.cgp.upenn.edu/pdf/Sanders_Rivers-TVASS_teacher%20effects.pdf [accessed June 2009].

Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R.T., and McKnight, C.C. (2005). Value-added research: Right idea but wrong solution? In R. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and applications (Chapter 6). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.

Tong, Y., and Kolen, M.J. (2007). Comparisons of methodologies and results in vertical scaling for educational achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 227-253.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009, January 12). Growth models: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/index.html [accessed June 2009].

Willett, J.B., and Singer, J.D. (in preparation). Applied multilevel data analysis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Willms, J.D. (2008). Seven key issues for assessing “value-added” in education. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.

Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 57-67.

Xu, Z., Hannaway, J., and Taylor, C. (2007). Making a difference? The effects of Teach For America in high school. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411642_Teach_America.pdf [accessed January 2009].

Young, M.J. (2006). Vertical scales. In S.M. Downing and T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 469-485). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Zumbo, B.D., and Forer, B. (2008). Testing and measurement from a multilevel view: Psychometrics and validation. In J. Bovaird, K. Geisinger, and C. Buckendahl (Eds.), High stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K-12 settings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

Zurawsky, C. (2004). Teachers matter: Evidence from value-added assessment. Research Points: Essential Information for Educational Policy, 2(2).



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement