The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Getting Value Out of Value-Added: Report of a Workshop
Reardon, S., and Raudenbush, S.W. (2008). Assumptions of value-added models for measuringschool effects. Presented at the Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 22-24.
Reckase, M.D. (2008). Measurement issues associated with value-added models. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.
Rogosa, D.R., and Willett, J.B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 335-343.
Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observablesand unobservables. Working Paper No. w14666. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sanders, W., and Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247-256.
Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R.T., and McKnight, C.C. (2005). Value-added research: Right idea but wrong solution? In R. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and applications (Chapter 6). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Tong, Y., and Kolen, M.J. (2007). Comparisons of methodologies and results in vertical scaling for educational achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 227-253.
Willett, J.B., and Singer, J.D. (in preparation). Applied multilevel data analysis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Willms, J.D. (2008). Seven key issues for assessing “value-added” in education. Paper prepared for the workshop of the Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Educational Accountability, National Research Council, Washington, DC, November 13-14. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/VAM_Workshop_Agenda.html.
Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., and Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluationin Education, 1(1), 57-67.
Young, M.J. (2006). Vertical scales. In S.M. Downing and T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook oftest development (pp. 469-485). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zumbo, B.D., and Forer, B. (2008). Testing and measurement from a multilevel view: Psychometricsand validation. In J. Bovaird, K. Geisinger, and C. Buckendahl (Eds.), High stakes testing ineducation: Science and practice in K-12 settings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Zurawsky, C. (2004). Teachers matter: Evidence from value-added assessment. ResearchPoints: Essential Information for Educational Policy, 2(2).