National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$38.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense (2010)
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB)

Citation Manager

. "Bibliography." Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
97
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense

Bibliography

In addition to the specific sources cited in this report’s footnotes and information provided in briefings to the committee (the briefings are listed in Appendix E), the committee also found the following list of resources useful.

Association for Enterprise Integration (AFEI). 2008. Industry Recommendations for DoD Acquisition of Information Services and SOA Systems. SOA AcquisitionWorking Group, AFEI Executive Forum on Business Change, Arlington, Va., July 7.

Beebe, H., and D. Meyerriecks. 2008. Next Generation C2: Formalizing Military Mashups. Prepared for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO-OTAN) by representatives of the Defense Information Systems Agency, Arlington, Va.

Boudreau, M. 2006. Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion: A Case Study in Spiral Development. Acquisition Research Case Study. Acquisition Research Program, Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif., October 30.

Carstens, R.D., M.A. Cohen, and M.F. Kupcy. 2008. Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting: A Publication of the Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative. New America Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Clancy, M., T. Goins, E. Giorgio, J. Gosler, J. Levine, D. Meyerriecks, R. Perlman, M. Perlman, D. Souleles, and B. Tribble. 2008. “NITT IAG Observations and Recommendations.” PowerPoint presentation, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency, June 6.

Dahmann, J.S. 2008. “Changes to DoD Acquisition Process on the Way.” September 12.

Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Panel. 2006. Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Report. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., January. Available at http://www.afei.org/documents/DAPA-Report-web-feb21.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

Page
97

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 97
Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense Bibliography In addition to the specific sources cited in this report’s footnotes and information provided in briefings to the committee (the briefings are listed in Appendix E), the committee also found the following list of resources useful. Association for Enterprise Integration (AFEI). 2008. Industry Recommendations for DoD Acquisition of Information Services and SOA Systems. SOA AcquisitionWorking Group, AFEI Executive Forum on Business Change, Arlington, Va., July 7. Beebe, H., and D. Meyerriecks. 2008. Next Generation C2: Formalizing Military Mashups. Prepared for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO-OTAN) by representatives of the Defense Information Systems Agency, Arlington, Va. Boudreau, M. 2006. Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion: A Case Study in Spiral Development. Acquisition Research Case Study. Acquisition Research Program, Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif., October 30. Carstens, R.D., M.A. Cohen, and M.F. Kupcy. 2008. Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting: A Publication of the Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative. New America Foundation, Washington, D.C. Clancy, M., T. Goins, E. Giorgio, J. Gosler, J. Levine, D. Meyerriecks, R. Perlman, M. Perlman, D. Souleles, and B. Tribble. 2008. “NITT IAG Observations and Recommendations.” PowerPoint presentation, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency, June 6. Dahmann, J.S. 2008. “Changes to DoD Acquisition Process on the Way.” September 12. Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Panel. 2006. Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Report. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., January. Available at http://www.afei.org/documents/DAPA-Report-web-feb21.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

OCR for page 98
Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense Defense Acquisition University. 2006. “Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment (DAPA) Project: List of Documents.” Defense Acquisition University, David D. Acker Library and Knowledge Repository, Fort Belvoir, Va., March. Available at http://www.dau.mil/library/pdf/DAPA.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008. Defense Acquisition University. 2008. “DoD Announces Major Revision to Acquisition Policy.” Available at https://akss.dau.mil; accessed January 27, 2009. Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Advanced Systems and Concepts. 2006. Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD): Program Overview. U.S. Department of Defense, October. DISA (Defense Information Systems Agency). 2008. A Guide for DISA Small Project Execution. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Office of the Component Acquisition Executive, Washington, D.C., June 30. DISA. 2008. Cooperative Review. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Washington, D.C., August. DISA. 2008. Enabling Warfighting: Speed, Services and Capabilities. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.gcn.com/acmfiles/sponsored_papers/DISA-final.pdf; accessed July 18, 2008. England, G. 2009. “Investment Review Board (IRB) Roles and Responsibilities.” Deputy Secretary of Defense, Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 08-020, OSD 15508-08, January 26. Executive Office of the President. 1986. A Formula for Action: A Report to the President on Defense Acquisition by the President’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management. April. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/library/pbrc/36ac7c2.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008. GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2008. Defense Acquisitions: A Knowledge-Based Funding Approach Could Improve Major Weapon System Program Outcomes. GAO/08-619. Washington, D.C., July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08619.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008. GAO. 2008. DoD Business Systems Modernization: Key Marine Corps System Acquisition Needs to Be Better Justified, Defined, and Managed. GAO-08-822. Washington, D.C., July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08822.pdf; accessed August 6, 2008. Gates, Robert M. 2009. Statement Submitted by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates to the House Armed Services Committee, U.S. Congress, January 27. Grasso, A. 2009. Information Technology Acquisition: A Common Sense Proposal. Defense AT&L, March-April. Kerber, R. 2007. “Raytheon: Army Aware of Missile’s Flaw, Firm Being Sued in Pilot’s Death.” Boston Globe, December 26. Available at http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/12/26/raytheon_army_aware_of_missiles_flaw/; accessed July 15, 2008. National Research Council. 1999. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2007. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental Test and Evaluation. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., September. Available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2008-05-DTE.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2007. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Mission Impact of Foreign Influence on DoD Software. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., September. Available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2007-09-Mission_Impact_of_Foreign_Influence_on_DoD_Software.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

OCR for page 99
Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2008. “Memorandum for Chairman, Defense Science Board: Terms of Reference—Defense Science Board Task Force on the Department of Defense Policies and Procedures for the Acquisition of Information Technology.” U.S. Department of Defense, Washington D.C. Stavros, N., M. Dettman, and J. Albrant. 2007. Engineering Governance. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego. Thibodeau, P. 2008. “Pentagon’s IT Unit Seeks to Adopt Cloud Computing.” New York Times, July 17. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C400693880002574890080F9EF.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss; accessed July 18, 2008. Vanucci, S. 2008. “New Acquisition Policy and Its Impact on Systems Engineering.” Systems and Software Engineering/Enterprise Development, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. Presentation at the NDIA 11th Annual Systems Engineering Conference, October 21.

OCR for page 100
Achieving Effective Acquisition of Information Technology in the Department of Defense This page intentionally left blank.