Defense Acquisition University. 2006. “Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment (DAPA) Project: List of Documents.” Defense Acquisition University, David D. Acker Library and Knowledge Repository, Fort Belvoir, Va., March. Available at http://www.dau.mil/library/pdf/DAPA.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

Defense Acquisition University. 2008. “DoD Announces Major Revision to Acquisition Policy.” Available at https://akss.dau.mil; accessed January 27, 2009.

Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Advanced Systems and Concepts. 2006. Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD): Program Overview. U.S. Department of Defense, October.

DISA (Defense Information Systems Agency). 2008. A Guide for DISA Small Project Execution. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Office of the Component Acquisition Executive, Washington, D.C., June 30.

DISA. 2008. Cooperative Review. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Washington, D.C., August.

DISA. 2008. Enabling Warfighting: Speed, Services and Capabilities. U.S. Department of Defense, DISA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.gcn.com/acmfiles/sponsored_papers/DISA-final.pdf; accessed July 18, 2008.

England, G. 2009. “Investment Review Board (IRB) Roles and Responsibilities.” Deputy Secretary of Defense, Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 08-020, OSD 15508-08, January 26.

Executive Office of the President. 1986. A Formula for Action: A Report to the President on Defense Acquisition by the President’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management. April. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/library/pbrc/36ac7c2.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2008. Defense Acquisitions: A Knowledge-Based Funding Approach Could Improve Major Weapon System Program Outcomes. GAO/08-619. Washington, D.C., July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08619.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

GAO. 2008. DoD Business Systems Modernization: Key Marine Corps System Acquisition Needs to Be Better Justified, Defined, and Managed. GAO-08-822. Washington, D.C., July. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08822.pdf; accessed August 6, 2008.

Gates, Robert M. 2009. Statement Submitted by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates to the House Armed Services Committee, U.S. Congress, January 27.

Grasso, A. 2009. Information Technology Acquisition: A Common Sense Proposal. Defense AT&L, March-April.

Kerber, R. 2007. “Raytheon: Army Aware of Missile’s Flaw, Firm Being Sued in Pilot’s Death.” Boston Globe, December 26. Available at http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/12/26/raytheon_army_aware_of_missiles_flaw/; accessed July 15, 2008.

National Research Council. 1999. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2007. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Developmental Test and Evaluation. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., September. Available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2008-05-DTE.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2007. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Mission Impact of Foreign Influence on DoD Software. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., September. Available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2007-09-Mission_Impact_of_Foreign_Influence_on_DoD_Software.pdf; accessed July 15, 2008.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement