|
3.1 |
Net generation of U.S. electric power industry, 2007, |
|||
|
3.2 |
Electric generation by fuel in four cases, 2007 and 2030, |
|||
|
4.1 |
Number of light-duty vehicles in the fleet for the Reference Case, |
|||
|
4.2 |
On-road fuel economy of vehicles for the Reference Case, |
|||
|
4.3 |
Types and numbers of light-duty vehicles for the Efficiency Case, |
|||
|
4.4 |
Fuel economy of new light-duty vehicles for the Efficiency Case, |
|||
|
4.5 |
Biofuel supply for the Biofuels-Intensive Case, |
|||
|
4.6 |
Penetration of PHEVs in the U.S. light-duty fleet, |
|||
|
4.7 |
Number of vehicles for the Portfolio Cases, a mix of PHEVs and efficient ICEVs and HEVs, introduced at the Maximum Practical rate, |
|||
|
4.8 |
Retail prices for PHEVs for probable and optimistic rates of technology progress, compared to the Reference Case vehicle (conventional ICEV), |
|||
|
4.9 |
Price of gasoline over time and at electricity price of 8 cents per kilowatt-hour, |
|||
|
4.10 |
Cash flow analysis for PHEV-10, Maximum Practical Case, Optimistic technical assumptions, |
|||
|
4.11 |
Gasoline consumption for PHEV-10s or PHEV-40s introduced at Maximum Practical and Probable penetration rates, |
|||
|
4.12 |
Gasoline use for the Reference Case and the Efficiency Case and when PHEVs are included in an already highly efficient fleet, |
|||
|
4.13 |
Gasoline use for scenarios that combine efficiency, biofuels, and either PHEVs or HFCVs, |
|||
|
4.14 |
GHG emissions from the future electric grid, |
|||
|
4.15 |
GHG emissions for PHEVs at the market penetrations shown in Figure 4.6 for the grid mix estimated by EIA, |
|||
|
4.16 |
GHG emissions for PHEVs at the market penetrations shown in Figure 4.6 for the grid mix estimated by EPRI/NRDC, |
|||
|
4.17 |
GHG emissions for cases combining ICEV Efficiency Case and PHEV or HFCV vehicles at the Maximum Practical penetration rate with the EPRI/NRDC grid mix, |
|||
|
4.18 |
GHG emissions for cases combining ICEV Efficiency Case and PHEV or HFCV vehicles at the Maximum Practical penetration rate with the EIA grid mix, |
|||
|
4.19 |
GHG emissions for cases combining the ICEV Efficiency Case and PHEV or HFCV vehicles for the EPRI/NRDC grid mix, |
|||
|
4.20 |
GHG emissions for scenarios combining ICEV Efficiency Case, Biofuels Case, and PHEVs or HFCVs, for the EIA grid mix, |
|||
|
4.21 |
GHG emissions for scenarios combining ICEV Efficiency Case, Biofuels Case, and PHEVs or HFCVs for the EPRI/ NRDC grid mix, |
|||
|
C.1 |
Number of vehicles in the Hydrogen Report Reference Case, |
|||
|
C.2 |
Fuel economy for vehicles in the Hydrogen Report Reference Case, |
|||
|
C.3 |
Number of vehicles in the ICEV Efficiency Case (Hydrogen Report Case 2), |
|||
|
C.4 |
Fuel economy for the ICEV Efficiency Case (Hydrogen Report Case 2), |
|||
|
C.5 |
Biofuel supply for the Biofuels-Intensive Case (Hydrogen Report Case 3), |
|||
|
C.6 |
Numbers of light-duty vehicles for portfolio approach, where PHEVs are combined with efficient ICEVs and HEVs, |
|||
|
C.7 |
PHEV operating modes, |
|||
|
C.8 |
National VMT fraction available for substitution by a PHEV using 100 percent electric charge-depleting mode, |
|||
|
C.9 |
Tank-to-wheels energy use in advanced vehicles, assuming 44 percent blending during charge-depleting operation, |
|||
|
C.10 |
Energy consumption in a PHEV-30 as electricity and gasoline for different blending strategies in CD mode, |
|||
|
C.11 |
Estimated on-road, fleet-average gasoline consumption for ICEVs, HEVs, and PHEVs in this study, |
|||
|
C.12 |
Estimated fleet-average electricity use over drive cycle for PHEVs in this study, |
|||
|
C.13 |
Cash flow analysis for PHEV-40, Maximum Practical case, Optimistic technical assumptions, |
|||
|
C.14 |
Cash flow analysis for PHEV-40, Probable case, Probable technical assumptions, |
|||
|
C.15 |
Cash flow analysis for PHEV-10, Maximum Practical case, Optimistic technical assumptions, |
|||
|
C.16 |
Cash flow analysis for PHEV-10, Probable case, Probable technical assumptions, |
|||
|
C.17 |
Cash flow analysis for mixed case (70 percent PHEV-10s and 30 percent PHEV-40s), Maximum Practical case, Optimistic technical assumptions, |