. "6 Costs and Benefits of Integrating Fuel Consumption Reduction Technologies into Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles." Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles
conditions and affecting, in turn, vehicle purchase decisions. More research is needed to assess the significance of this potential impact.
Finding 6-17. Some fuel-efficiency-improving technologies will reduce cargo capacity for trucks that are currently “weighed out” and will therefore force additional trucks onto the road. More research is needed to assess the significance of this potential impact.
Finding 6-18. The committee found no current studies or analyses suggesting that manufacturability was a major barrier to the integration of gas/diesel engine, hybrid, aerodynamic, tire, or other technologies in the vehicle manufacturing process. However, there may be challenges with integrating new technologies into manufacturers’ product development processes, and sufficient time is needed for design and validation, customer acceptance, testing, and compliance strategy development.
Recommendation 6-1. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in its study, should do an economic/payback analysis based on fuel usage by application and different fuel price scenarios. Operating and maintenance costs should be part of any study.
American Bus Association. 2006. Commercial Bus Emissions Characterization & Idle Reduction: Idle & Urban Cycle Test Results. Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S. Federal Highway Administration. Available at http://www.buses.org/files/download/motorcoach_idling_study.pdf.
AHUA (American Highway Users Alliance). 2004.Unclogging America’s Arteries, 1999-2004. Available at www.highways.org.
American Transportation Research Institute. 2008. An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking. Total Cost Summary. P. 18, Table 4. Arlington, Va.
Baker, H., R. Cornwell, E. Koehler, and J. Patterson. 2009. Review of Low Carbon Technologies for Heavy Goods Vehicles—Annex 1. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation by Ricardo PLC, West Sussex, U.K. June.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. Motor Coach Idling Field Observation Study for Washington, DC, Metro Area. Transportation and Regional Programs Division and SmartWay Transport Partnership Group, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://epa.gov/smartway/documents/420s06004.pdf.
IFEU (Institut für Energieund Umweltforschung, Heidelberg GmbH). 2003. Energy Savings by Lightweighting. Heidelberg, Germany: IFEU.
Jones, J., F. Nix, and C. Schwier. 1990. The Impact of Changes in Road User Charges on Canadian Railways. Prepared for Transport Canada by the Canadian Institute of Guided Ground Transport, Kingston, Ontario. September.
NESCCAF, ICCT, Southwest Research Institute, and TIAX. 2009. Reducing Heavy-Duty Long Haul Combination Truck Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions. Washington, D.C.: International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). October.
Parry, I. 2006. How Should Heavy-Duty Trucks Be Taxed? Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. April.
Research and Markets. 2009. Lithium-Ion and Nickel-Metal Hydride Batteries, Lithium, Rare Earth Lanthanum and the Future of Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Electric Vehicles 2009-2020. Brochure. Available at www.researchandmarkets.com/. Accessed November 2, 2009.
Schrank, D., and T. Lomax. 2005. The 2005 Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System. Available at http://mobility/tamu.edu.
Schubert, R., and M. Kromer. 2008. Heavy-Duty Truck Retrofit Technology: Assessment and Regulatory Approach. Prepared by TIAX, LLC, for the Union of Concerned Scientists, September 12.
TTI (Texas Transportation Institute). 2007. 2007 Annual Urban Mobility Report, Appendix A. College Station, Tex: TTI.
TIAX LLC. 2009. Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium-and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Final Report for the National Academy of Sciences. Sept. 16.