Cambridge Systematics. 2009. Moving Cooler: An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute. July.

Cambridge Systematics. 2010a. Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study. Prepared for the I-95 Corridor Coalition. Forthcoming.

Cambridge Systematics. 2010b. Transportation’s Role in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration. Forthcoming.

CARB (California Air Resources Board). No date. Heavy-Duty VehicleGreenhouse Gas Measure. Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/hdghg/hdghg.htm.

CARB. 2005. Proposal to Reduce Idling Emissions from On-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles. Available at www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/truckidling/workshop-03-23-2005.ppt.

CARB. 2008. The Carl Moyers Program Guidelines: Approved Revision 2008. April 22.

CARB. 2009. Facts About Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Regulation: Reducing Climate Change Emissions from Tractor-Trailers. June 30.

Corbett, J.J., and J.J. Winebrake. 2007. Sustainable movement of goods: Energy and environmental implications of trucks, trains, ships, and planes, Environmental Management (November): 8-12.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2008. Energy Market and Economic Impacts of S. 2191, the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007. Energy Information Administration. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/service_rpts.htm.

DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). 2000. The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Transportation Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study. August. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/tswstudy/TSWfinal.htm.

EEA (Energy and Environmental Analysis). 2008.Market-Based Approaches to Fuel Economy: Summary of Policy Options. Prepared for National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). No date. Federal Excise Tax Exemption. Available at http://www.epa.gov/smartway/transport/what-smartway/idling-reduction-fet.htm.

EPA. 2004. A Glance at Clean Freight Strategies: Idle Reduction. February. Available at http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?DockeyP1000S9K.txt.

EPA. 2009a. Federal Tax Credits for Energy Efficiency. Updated September 14. Available at http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?ctax_credits.tx_index#s3.

EPA. 2009b. Innovative Financing: SmartWay Clean Diesel Finance Program. August. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/smartway/transport/what-smartway/financing-clean-diesel-info.htm.

FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). No date. Corridor: Interstate 70 (I-70): Dedicated Truck Lanes—Missouri to Ohio. Available at http://www.corridors.dot.gov/i70.htm.

FHWA. 1997. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study.

FHWA. 2005. I-710 Major Corridor Study, Final Report. March.

Freight Best Practice. 2009. Examples of Cost Savings. Available at www.freightbestpractice.org/examples-of-cost-savings.

Greszler, A. 2009. Heavy duty vehicle fleet technologies for reducing carbon dioxide: An industry perspective. Pp. 101-116 in Reducing Climate Impacts in the Transportation Sector, D. Sperling and J.S. Cannon, eds. Springer.

Hourdakis, J., and P.G. Michalopoulos. 2001. Evaluation of Ramp Control Effectiveness in Two Twin Cities Freeways, Transportation Research Board 2002 Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.

Latty, J. 2009. JCL Driver Training, Southport, Merseyside, England. Available at www.jcldrivertraining.co.uk.

Leavitt, W. 2005. Idle cash. FleetOwner. April.

Maccubbin, R., B. Staples, F. Kabir, C. Lowrance, M. Mercer, B. Phillips, and S. Gordon. 2008. Intelligent Transportation Systems Benefits, Costs, Deployment, and Lessons Learned: 2008 Update. Report No. FHWA-JPO-08-032. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

McKinnon, A. 2005. The economic and environmental benefits of increasing Maximum Truck Weight: The British Experience. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10(1): 77-95.

Miller, E. 2009. EPA exempts 70 idle-reduction devices from federal excise tax for first time. Transport Topics, February 2, p. 4.

NESCCAF/ICCT, Southwest Research Institute, and TIAX. 2009. Reducing Heavy-Duty Long Haul Combination Truck Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions. Washington, D.C.: International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). October.

RTAC (Roads and Transportation Association of Canada). 1986. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study—Technical Steering Committee Report. December.

TIAX LLC. 2009. Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium-and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Final Report for the National Academy of Sciences. Sept. 16.

Transport for London. 2006. Central London Congestion Charging: Impacts Monitoring, Fourth Annual Report. June.

TRB (Transportation Research Board). 1990a. Special Report 225: Truck Weight Limits: Issues and Options. Washington, D.C.: TRB.

TRB. 1990b. Special Report 227: New Trucks for Greater Productivity and Less Road Wear: An Evaluation of the Turner Proposal. Washington, D.C.: TRB.

TRB. 2002. Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles. Washington, D.C.: TRB.

TRB. 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C.: TRB.

Tunnell, M. 2008. Energy and Emissions Impacts of Operating Higher Productivity Vehicles: Update: 2008. American Trucking Research Institute. March.

Winebrake, J.J., J.J. Corbett, A. Falzarano, J.S. Hawker, K. Korfmacher, S. Ketha, and S. Zilora. 2008. Assessing energy, environmental, and economic tradeoffs in intermodal freight transportation. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 58(8): 1004-1013.

Woodrooffe, J., B. Belzowski, J. Reese, and P. Sweatman. 2009. Analysis of the Potential Benefits of Larger Trucks for U.S. Businesses Operating Private Fleets. Prepared for the National Private Truck Council. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. May.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement