National Academies Press: OpenBook

Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports (2010)

Chapter: Appendix E: HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR

« Previous: Appendix D: Measurement Opportunities for the Framework's Components of Quality Care
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12846.
×
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12846.
×
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12846.
×
Page 173
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12846.
×
Page 174

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix E HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR and NHDR To select the core set of measures used in the NHQR and NHDR, AHRQ staff and the HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR/NHDR applied three basic criteria recommended by the IOM in 2001—importance, scientific soundness, and feasibility (see discussion in Box 4-1 in Chapter 4)—to each individual measure, mapped potential measures to the elements of the earlier quality framework (effectiveness, safety, timeliness, and patient- centeredness), and selected clinically important conditions within effectiveness measures. In an explanation of its selection process for identifying gap areas and priority areas, AHRQ staff provided the Future Directions committee with a side-by-side comparison of the specific factors considered relative to the criterion of importance in the development of the 2005 NHQR and NHDR (see Table E-1). The factors included: leading causes of death, disability or activity limitation, or principal hospital diagnoses; costly conditions in gen- eral and for hospitalizations specifically; areas with Black-White racial disparities in life years lost, educational disparities in life years lost, and other significant racial and ethnic disparities. The HHS Interagency Workgroup for the NHQR/NHDR determined by looking across these lists that the data supported continued inclusion of the same clinical conditions originally chosen from Healthy People 2010. REFERENCES AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). 2005a. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2005. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ———. 2005b. National Healthcare Quality Report, 2005. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ———. 2005c. Expenses for selected conditions by type of service: United States, 2005. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2001. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States, 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 50(7):120-125. HCUP (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project). 2005. Hospitalizations in the United States, 2002. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 2004. HHS strategic plan FY 2004-2009: Goals. http://aspe.hhs.gov/hhsplan/2004/ goals.shtml (accessed March 17, 2010). IOM (Institute of Medicine ). 2003. Priority areas for national action: Transforming health care quality. Washington, DC: The National Acad- emies Press. Krause, L.E., S. Stoddard, and D. Gilmartin. Chartbook on disability in the United States, 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. NVSS (National Vital Statistics System). 2005. Deaths: Leading causes for 2002. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 171

172 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY AND DISPARITIES REPORTS NVSS, 2005 SIPP, 2001 NHIS, 1996 MEPS, 2005 HCUP, 2005 Causes of activity Most costly Leading causes of death Main causes of disability limitation conditions Hospital principal diagnoses 1. Diseases of the heart 1. Arthritis or 1. Heart disease 1. Heart 1. Newborn infant rheumatism conditions 2. Malignant neoplasms 2. Back or spine problem 2. Back problems 2. Trauma 2. Hardening of the heart arteries (coronary atherosclerosis) 3. Cerebrovascular 3. Heart trouble / 3. Arthritis 3. Cancer 3. Pneumonia diseases hardening of the arteries 4. Chronic lower 4. Lung or respiratory 4. Asthma 4. Mental 4. Congestive heart failure respiratory diseases problem disorders 5. Accidents 5. Deafness or hearing 5. Diabetes 5. Pulmonary 5. Chest pain (unintentional injuries) problem conditions 6. Diabetes mellitus 6. Limb / extremity 6. Mental disorders 6. Trauma to vulva (external female stiffness genitals) and perineum (area between anus and vagina) due to childbirth 7. Influenza and 7. Mental or emotional 7. Disorders of the eye 7. Heart attack (acute myocardial pneumonia problem infarction) 8. Alzheimer’s disease 8. Diabetes 8. Learning disabilities 8. Cardiac dysrhythmias (irregular heart and mental retardation beat) 9. Nephritis, nephritic 9. Blindness or vision 9. Cancer 9. Other maternal complications of birth syndrome, and nephrosis problem and puerperium (period after childbirth) 10. Septicemia 10. Stroke 10. Visual impairments 11. Intentional self-harm 11. Broken bone/ (suicide) fracture 12. Chronic liver disease 12. Mental retardation and cirrhosis 13. Essential (primary) 13. Cancer hypertension and hypertensive renal disease 14. Parkinson’s disease 14. High blood pressure 15. Pneumonitis due to 15. Head or spinal cord solids and liquids injury NOTE: This table was provided to IOM by AHRQ. The information contained in this table may not correspond with all of the information included in the source documents. The IOM does not take responsibility for any inconsistencies.

APPENDIX E 173 IOM, 2003 HHS, 2004 NHIS, 2002 NHIS, 2002 NHIS, 2002 NHQR/NHDR 2005 Black-White Educational Serious racial Interagency Priority areas for quality Major threats to the health disparity in life disparity in life and ethnic Workgroup improvement and well-being of Americans years lost years lost disparities Consensus Cancer screening that is Reduce behavioral and other 1. Hypertension 1. Ischemic heart Infant Cancer evidence based—focus factors that contribute to disease mortality on colorectal and cervical the development of chronic cancer diseases Children with special health Reduce the incidence of 2. HIV 2. Lung cancer Breast and Diabetes care needs sexually transmitted diseases cervical cancer and unintended pregnancies Diabetes—focus on Increase immunization rates 3. Diabetes 3. Cerebrovascular Diabetes End-stage renal appropriate management of among adults and children mellitus disease disease early disease End of life with advanced Reduce substance abuse 4. Homicide 4. Congestive HIV Heart disease organ system failure—focus heart disease infections/ on congestive heart failure AIDS and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Frailty associated with old Reduce tobacco use, 5. Atherosclerotic 5. Pneumonia Child HIV and AIDS age—preventing falls and especially among youth disease and adult pressure ulcers, maximizing immunizations function, and developing advanced care plans Hypertension—focus on Reduce the incidence and 6. Lung disease Maternal and child appropriate management of consequences of injuries and health early disease violence Immunization—children 7. Atherosclerotic Respiratory diseases and adults disease Ischemic heart disease— 8. Diabetes Nursing home and prevention, reduction mellitus home health care of recurring events, and optimization of functional capacity Major depression— 9. Hypertension Patient safety screening and treatment Medication management— 10. Colon cancer Timeliness preventing medication errors and overuse of antibiotics Nosocomial infections— Patient-centeredness prevention and surveillance Pain control in advanced cancer Pregnancy and childbirth— appropriate prenatal and intrapartum care Severe and persistent mental illness—focus on treatment in the public sector Stroke—early intervention and rehabilitation Tobacco dependence treatment in adults Obesity (emerging area)

Next: Appendix F: The Expected Population Value of Quality Indicator Reporting (EPV-QIR): A Framework for Prioritizing Healthcare Performance Measurement »
Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports Get This Book
×
 Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports
Buy Paperback | $80.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

As the United States devotes extensive resources to health care, evaluating how successfully the U.S. system delivers high-quality, high-value care in an equitable manner is essential. At the request of Congress, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) annually produces the National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR) and the National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR). The reports have revealed areas in which health care performance has improved over time, but they also have identified major shortcomings. After five years of producing the NHQR and NHDR, AHRQ asked the IOM for guidance on how to improve the next generation of reports.

The IOM concludes that the NHQR and NHDR can be improved in ways that would make them more influential in promoting change in the health care system. In addition to being sources of data on past trends, the national healthcare reports can provide more detailed insights into current performance, establish the value of closing gaps in quality and equity, and project the time required to bridge those gaps at the current pace of improvement.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!