|
National Committee Reports Based on a Deliberative Process
|
In view of present and potential human and monetary costs of treating current levels of obesity or obesity-related diseases, what types of actions are recommended within and outside of the health care system? (“What” question)
|
Reasoned and formal analysis by a committee of established experts, such as a report by a committee convened by the public or private sector with established bias and conflict-of-interest procedures
|
|
Guidelines from National Associations, Health Foundations, and Committed Practitioner or Health Professional Organizations
|
Given the availability of effective measures to treat high blood pressure, what steps are needed to improve levels of blood pressure control in the population at large? (“What” question)
|
Public statements of consensus by a committee of established professionals and practitioners
|
|
Other Expert Statements
|
How does this intervention fit with community politics or national policy priorities? On what basis should it be given high priority? (“How” questions)
|
The considered opinion of experts in a particular field or practitioners, leaders, stakeholders, and policy makers able to make informed judgments on implementation issues and having local or governmental expertise (e.g., doctors, lawyers, nutritionists, scientists, or academics able to interpret the scientific literature or specialized forms of data, such as legal evidence)
|