. "Appendix E: An In-Depth Look at Study Designs and Methodologies." Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making
“a description of the main stages in a systematic review of evidence from research and nonresearch sources designed to inform decision making by policy makers and managers;
an indication of the range of evidence that could potentially be incorporated into such reviews;
pragmatic guidance on the main methodological issues…, given the early stage of development of methods of such reviews, and with a particular focus on the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence;
an introduction to some of the approaches available to synthesize these different forms of evidence; and
an indication of the types of review questions particular approaches to synthesis are best able to address.”
These alternatives to evidence-based practice of the most literal and rigorous scientific variety suggest some advantages and complementarities of a model of practice-based evidence that produces locally adapted and prospectively tested evidence. Users of this and other guidance for linking research to the decisions they must make in their own settings will need to trade off some degree of rigor for more reality in the setting, conditions of practice, and free-living populations observed.
Abroms, L. C., and E. W. Maibach. 2008. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Annual Review of Public Health 29:219-234.
Banwell, C., S. Hinde, J. Dixon, and B. Sibthorpe. 2005. Reflections on expert consensus: A case study of the social trends contributing to obesity. European Journal of Public Health 15(6):564-568.
Bartholomew, L. K., G. S. Parcel, G. Kok, and N. H. Gotleib. 2006. Planning health promotionprograms: An intervention mapping approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Wiley.
Berkman, L. F., and I. Kawachi, eds. 2000. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Best, A., D. Stokols, L. W. Green, S. Leischow, B. Holmes, and K. Buchholz. 2003. An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion 18(2):168-176.
Booth, S. L., J. F. Sallis, C. Ritenbaugh, J. O. Hill, L. L. Birch, L. D. Frank, K. Glanz, D. A. Himmelgreen, M. Mudd, B. M. Popkin, K. A. Rickard, S. St Jeor, and N. P. Hays. 2001. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: Rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutrition Reviews 59(3, Supplement 2):S21-S39.
Bowen, S., and A. B. Zwi. 2005. Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: A framework for action. PLoS Medicine 2(7):600-605.
Campbell, D. T., and D. A. Kenny. 1999. A primer on regression artifacts. New York: Guilford.
Campbell, D. T., and J. C. Stanley. 1966. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs forresearch. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.