National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: APPENDIX H Satellite-Based Challenges and Solutions
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

APPENDIX I

References

Adushkin, V.V. and W. Leith. 2001. The containment of Soviet underground nuclear explosions. U.S. Geological Survey. Open File Report 01312. 52 pp.

Altshuler, L.V., Y.B. Zeldovich, and Y.M. Styashkin. 1997. Investigation of isentropic compression and equations of state and fissionable materials. Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 167 (1):107-108. (In English).

Arrowsmith, S.J., M.A.H. Hedlin, B. Stump, and M.D. Arrowsmith. 2008. Infrasonic signals from large mining explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (2):768-777.

Arveson, P.T. and D.J. Vendittis. 2000. Radiated Noise Characteristics of a Modern Cargo Ship, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (1):118-129.

Auer, M., A. Axelsson, X. Blanchard, T.W. Bowyer, G. Brachet, I. Bulowski, Y. Dubasov, K. Elmgren, J.P. Fontaine, W. Harms, J.C. Hayes, T.R. Heimbigner, J.I. McIntyre, M.E. Panisko, Y. Popov, A. Ringbom, H. Sartorius, S. Schmid, J. Schulze, C. Schlosser, T. Taffary, W. Weiss, and B. Wernsperger. 2004. Intercomparison experiments of systems for the measurement of xenon radionuclides in the atmosphere. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 60 (6):863-877.

Barker, R.B., H.G. Chiles, Jr., C.B. Curtis, S.D. Drell, R.F. Herbst, R.A. Hoover, H.W. Kendall, and L.D. Welch.1999. Report of the Commission on Maintaining U.S. Nuclear Weapons Expertise. Washington, D.C. 1 March 1999.

Berest, P. and D.N. Minh. 1981. Stability of cavities in rock salt. Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium on Weak Rock, Tokyo. September 21-24. 473-478.

Bieringer, J., C. Schlosser, H. Sartorius, and S. Schmid. 2009. Trace analysis of aerosol bound particulates and noble gases at the BfS in Germany. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67 (5):672-677.

Bilham, R. 2009. The seismic future of cities. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 7 (4):839-887.

Bodman, S. 2008. A Future Vision for NNSA’s National Security Laboratories: Transforming the Nuclear Weapons Complex into a National Security Enterprise. U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/nnsa/news/documents/Future_Vision.pdf

Bondar, I., S. Myers, E.R. Engdahl, and E. Bergman. 2004. Epicenter accuracy based on seismic network criteria. Geophysical Journal International 56 (3):483-496.

Bonner, J., R.B. Herrmann, D. Harkrider, and M. Pasyanos. 2008. The surface wave magnitude for the 9 October 2006 North Korean nuclear explosion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (5):2498-2506. [doi:10.1785/0120080929].

Bottone, S., M.D. Fisk, G.D. McCartor. 2002. Regional seismic event characterization using a simple Bayesian formulation of simple kriging. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92 (6):2277-2296.

Bowers, D. and N.D. Selby. 2009. Forensic seismology and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 37:209-236. [doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124143]. Bowers, D. and W.R. Walter. 2002. Discriminating between large mine collapses and explosions using teleseismic P waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics 159 (4):803-830.

Brooks, L.F. 2005. Statement of National Nuclear Security Administrator Linton F. Brooks Before the House Armed Services Committee. Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. March 2, 2005. Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Carothers, J.E. 1995. Caging the Dragon: The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions. U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Agency Report DOE/NV-388 DNA TR 95-74. Washington, D.C. 726 pp.

Carrigan, C.R., R.A. Heinle, G.B. Hudson, J.J. Nitao, and J.J. Zucca. 1996. Trace gas emissions on geological faults as indicators of underground nuclear testing. Nature 382 (6591):528-531.

Che, I.-Y., T.S. Kim, J.-S. Jeon, and H.I. Lee. 2009. Infrasound observation of the apparent North Korean nuclear test of 25 May 2009. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (22), Art. No. L22802.

Chiapetta, F., F. Heuze, W. Walter, R. Hopler, V. Hsu, B. Martin, C. Pearson, B. Stump, and K. Zipf. 1999. Mine Seismicity and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Department of Energy Working Group Report LA-UR-99-384. Washington, D.C. 62 pp. Available at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=329501.

Chun, K.-Y. and G.A. Henderson. 2009. Lg attenuation near the North Korean border with China, Part II: Model development from the 2006 nuclear explosion in North Korea. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (5):3030-3038.

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), August 2010. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (classified document).

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). 2008. Special Report: First integrated on-site inspection field exercise, Kazakhstan. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/specials/integrated-field-exercise-2008/.

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) Press Centre. 2009. Overview: DPRK 2009 announced nuclear test. Press Releases May 25, 2009-June 12, 2009. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/developments-after-1996/2009-dprk-announced-nuclear-test/.

Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States. 2009. America’s Strategic Posture: The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States. U.S. Institute of Peace Press. Washington, D.C.

Dahlman, O., S. Mykkeltveit, and H. Haak. 2009. Nuclear Test Ban: Converting Political Visions to Reality. Dordrecht: Springer.

Davis, D.M. and L.R. Sykes. 1999. Geological constraints on clandestine nuclear testing in South Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 96 (20):11090-11095.

Davison, I. 2009. Faulting and fluid flow through salt. Journal of the Geological Society 166 (2):205-216.

Defense Science Board (DSB). 2006. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Capabilities. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 58 pp.

Defense Science Board. 2008. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrent Skills. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 148 pp.

Defense Science Board. 2009. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Computing. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 65 pp.

de Groot-Hedlin, C. and J. Orcutt. 2001. T-phase observations in northern California: Acoustic to seismic coupling at a weakly elastic boundary. Pure and Applied Geophysics 158 (3):513-530.

Denny, M.D. and D.M. Goodman. 1990. A case study of the seismic source function: Salmon and Sterling reevaluated. Journal of Geophysical Research 95 (B12):19705-19729.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

DNI News Release. 2006. Statement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on the North Korea Nuclear Test. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) News Release No. 19-06. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/announcements/20061016_release.pdf.

DNI News Release. 2009. Statement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on North Korea’s Declared Nuclear Test on May 25, 2009. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) News Release No. 23-09. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/20090615_release.pdf.

Dreger, D.S., S.R. Ford, and W.R. Walter. 2008. Source analysis of the Crandall Canyon, Utah mine collapse. Science 321 (5886):217.

Dubasov, U.V., S.A. Zelentsov, G.A. Krasilov, V.A. Logachyov, A.M. Matsushchenko, S.G. Smagulov, B.S. Tsaturov, G.A. Tsirkov, and A.K. Chernyshov. 1994. Chronological list of the atmospheric nuclear tests at the Semipalatinsk Test Site and their radiological characteristics. In Scientific Research Institute for Regional Medical and Ecological Problem, Herald of the Research Program “Semipalatinsk Test Site-Altai” N4. 1994. Shoikhet, J.H. (Ed.). Scientific and Practical Journal, Digest of the International Panel Meet “NATO/SCOPE-RADTEST.” Barnaul. September 5-10, 1994.

Fineren, D., S. Webb, and A. Barker. 2009. FACTBOX-Nuclear Power Plans in Africa, Middle East. December 29, 2009. [Online]. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/29/nuclear-energy-idUSLDE5BN04Y20091229?type=marketsNews.

Ford, S.R., D.S. Dreger, and W.R. Walter. 2009. Source analysis of the Memorial Day explosion, Kimchaek, North Korea. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (21): Art. No. L21304. 5pp. [doi:10.1029 / 2009GL040003].

French Government. 2008. The French White Paper on Defence and National Security. Odile Jacob Publishing Corporation, New York, NY. 332 pp. Available at: http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/france_english2008.pdf.

Garbin, H.D. 1986. Free-field and Decoupling Analysis of MILL YARD Data. Report SAND86-1702. Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. 21 pp.

Gertz, B. 1997. Russia suspected of nuclear testing: Moscow says blast was an earthquake (A). The Washington Times. August 28, 1997.

Glen, L.A. and P. Goldstein. 1994. Seismic decoupling with chemical and nuclear explosions in salt. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (B6):11723-11730.

Global Security Newswire (GSN). 2011. Russia to ready new ICBM by 2013. Global Security Newswire. The National Journal Group. March 18, 2011. Available at: http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20110318_6022.php.

Goldstein, P. and L.A. Glen. 1993. Modeling of tamped and decoupled explosions in salt (Simulation is easy. Prediction is difficult!). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Proceedings of the Numerical Modeling for Underground Nuclear Test Monitoring Symposium, Durango, CO. March 23-25, 1993. Report UCRL-JC-113801 Preprint. 8 pp.

“Governance Charter for an Interagency Council on the Strategic Capability of DOE National Laboratories as National Security Assets.” Signed by Steven Chu, Dennis Blair, Jane Holl Lute, and Robert Gates. 6 July 2010. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13367&page=33.

Granville, J.P., P.G. Richards, W.-Y. Kim, and L.R. Sykes. 2005. Understanding the differences between three teleseismic mb scales. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95 (5):1809-1824.

Hague, W. 2010. Statement on foreign affairs and defense. Daily Hansard, May 26, 2010. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100526/debtext/100526-0005.htm.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Hanson, J.A. and J.R. Bowman. 2006. Methods for monitoring hydroacoustic events using direct and reflected T-waves in the Indian Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth 111 (2): Art. No. B02305. 18 pp.

Harris, D.B. 1991. A waveform correlation method for identifying quarry explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 81 (6):2395-2418.

Hartse, H.E. 1998. The 16 August 1997 Novaya Zemlya seismic event as viewed from GSN stations KEV and KBS. Seismological Research Letters 69 (3):206-215.

Hartse, H.E. 2000. The anticipated view of Lop Nor test site from array MKAR based on research using data recorded at GSN station MAKZ. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM. LA-CP-00-204. 42 pp.

Hartse, H.E., S.R. Taylor, W.S. Phillips, and G.E. Randall. 1997. A preliminary study of regional seismic discrimination in Central Asia with emphasis on Western China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87 (3):551-568.

Hartse, H.E., R.A. Flores, and P.A. Johnson. 1998. Correcting regional seismic discriminants for path effects in western China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88 (2):596-608.

Heuzé, F.E., T.R. Butkovich, O.R. Walton, and D.M. Maddix. 1991. Explosion phenomenology in jointed rocks: New insights. In Explosion Source Phenomenology. Taylor, S., H. Patton, and P. Richards (Eds.). American Geophysical Union Monograph 65:253-260.

Hong, T.-K., C.-E. Baag, H. Choi, and D.-H. Sheen. 2008. Regional seismic observations of the 9 October 2006 underground nuclear explosion in North Korea and the influence of crustal structure on regional phases. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth 113 (3): Art No. B03305. 15 pp. [doi:10.1029/2007JB004950].

Ingram, P. 2010. UK and France Sign Landmark Defence Agreements. British American Security Information Council. [Online]. Available at: http://basicint.org/search/news?curr=736&terms=radiographic&topic=0&region=0&pos_up=news&pos_inc=1.

JASON Group 1994. Science Based Stockpile Stewardship. JSR-94-345. The MITRE Corporation. 110 pp. Available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/sbss.pdf.

JASON Group. 2007. Pit Lifetime. JSR-06-335. The MITRE Corporation. 29 pp. Available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/pit.pdf.

JASON Group. 2009. Lifetime Extension Program (LEP) Executive Summary. JSR-09-334E. The MITRE Corporation. 5 pp.

Khalturin, V.I., T.G. Rautian, P.G. Richards, and W.S. Leith. 2005. A review of nuclear testing by the Soviet Union at Novaya Zemlya, 1955-1990. Science and Global Security 13 (1-2):1-42. [doi: 10.1080/08929880590961862]. Khalturin, V.I., T.G. Rautian, and P.G. Richards. 1998. The seismic signal strength of chemical explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88 (6):1511-1524.

Kidder, R. 1985. Militarily significant nuclear explosive yields. FAS Public Interest Report. 38 (7): 2 pp.

Killian, J.R. 1977. Sputnik, Scientists, and Eisenhower. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 360 pp.

Kim, T.S., I.B. Kang, and G.Y. Kim. 2009. Yield ratio estimates using regional Pn and Pg from North Korea’s underground nuclear explosions. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (12): L22302. 6 pp. [doi:10.1029/2009GL040495].

Kim, W.-Y. and P.G. Richards. 2007. North Korean Nuclear Test: Seismic discrimination at low yield. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 88 (14):158-161.

Kim, W.-Y., P.G. Richards, and L.R. Sykes. 2009. Discrimination of earthquakes and explosions near nuclear test sites using regional high-frequency data. Poster presented at the International Scientific Studies Conference. Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ISS_2009/Poster/SEISMO-.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

            27J%20%28US%29%20-%20Won_Young_Kim%20_Paul_Richards%20and%20Lynn_Sykes.pdf

Koper, K.D., R.B. Herrmann, and H.M. Benz. 2008. Overview of open seismic data from the North Korean event of 9 October 2006. Seismological Research Letters 79 (2):178-185. [doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.2.178].

Kværna, T. and F. Ringdal. 1999. Seismic threshold monitoring for continuous assessment of global detection capability. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89 (4):946-959.

Kværna, T., F. Ringdal, J. Schweitzer, and L. Taylor. 2002. Optimized seismic threshold monitoring-Part 1: Regional processing. Pure Applied Geophysics 159 (5):969-987.

Kværna, T. and F. Ringdal. 2009. Analysis of the IDC Reviewed Event Bulletin for detection capability estimation of the IMS primary and auxiliary seismic stations. International Scientific Studies Conference, SEISMO Poster 15/J. Vienna, Austria. 10-12 June 2009. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ISS_2009/Poster/SEISMO-15J%20%28Norway%29%20-%20Tormod_Kvaerna%20and%20Frode_Ringdal.pdf.

Lay, T. (Ed.). 2009. Seismological Grand Challenges in Understanding Earth’s Dynamic Systems: Long-range Science Plan for Seismology Workshop. September 18-19, 2008, Denver, CO. Report to [S.I.] the National Science Foundation. IRIS Consortium. 84 pp. Available at: http://www.iris.edu/hq/lrsps/seis_lrp_12_08_08.pdf.

Leith. W. 2001. Geologic and Engineering Constraints on the Feasibility of Clandestine Nuclear Testing by Decoupling in Large Underground Cavities. USGS Open File Report 01-28. 56 pp. Available at: http://www.vadeker.net/ipri/archive/USGSOFR0128.pdf.

Le Pichon, A., J. Vergoz, P. Herry, and L. Ceranna. 2008. Analyzing the detection capability of infrasound arrays in Central Europe. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres 113 (12): Art. No.: D12115. Le Pichon, A., J. Vergoz, E. Blanc, J. Guilbert, L. Ceranna, L. Evers, and N. Brachet. 2009. Assessing the performance of the International Monitoring System’s infrasound network: Geographical coverage and temporal variabilities. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres 114 (8): Art No. D08112.

Los Alamos National Laboratory. 2009. Fogbank: Lost knowledge regained. Nuclear Weapons Journal 2: 20-21.

Matthews, K.M. and L.-E. de Geer. 2005. Processing of data from a global atmospheric radioactivity monitoring network for CTBT verification purposes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 263 (1):235-240.

McDonald, M.A., J.A. Hildebrand, and S.M. Wiggins. 2006. Increases in the deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west on San Nicolas Island, California. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (2):711-718.

Medalia, J. 2009. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Updated “Safeguards” and Net Assessments. Congressional Research Service. R40612.

Medalia, J. 2010. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Background and Current Developments. Congressional Research Service. RL33548.

Mikhailov, V.N. (Ed.). 1996. USSR Nuclear Weapons Tests and Peaceful Nuclear Explosions: 1949 through 1990. Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy and Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow. 63 pp.

Mikhailov, V.N. (Ed.). 1998. Nuclear Tests of the USSR, Hydronuclear Experiments. Sarov Russian Federal Nuclear Center. Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy and Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow. (In Russian).

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Miller, G., M. Anastasio, and P. Hommert. 2010. Letter to Hon. John Kerry and Hon. Richard Lugar, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 12/1/2010. 2 pgs. Available at: http://lugar.senate.gov/issues/start/pdf/12012010Letters2.pdf.

Modrak, R.T., S.J. Arrowsmith, and D.N. Anderson. 2010. A bayesian framework for infrasound location. Geophysical Journal International 181 (1):399-405.

Murphy, J.R. 1996. Types of seismic events and their source descriptions. In Monitoring a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, NATO ASI Series E. Husebye, E.S. and A.M. Dainty (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 225-245.

Murphy, J.R. 2009. A Review of the Cavity Decoupling Evasion Scenario: Implications for Seismic Monitoring of Underground Nuclear Explosions. Presentation to the Committee to Review and Update of Technical Issues Related to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Washington, D.C. September 29, 2009. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Murphy, J.R. and B.W. Barker. 1995. A Comparative Analysis of the Seismic Characteristics of Cavity Decoupled Nuclear and Chemical Explosions. Phillips Laboratory, Directorate of Geophysics, Air Force Materiel Command, Hanscom Air Force Base. PL-TR-95-2177, March, 1995. 96 pp. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA304812.

Myers, S.C., M.L. Begnaud, S. Ballard, M.E. Pasyanos, W.S. Phillips, A.L. Ramirez, M.S. Antolik, K.D. Hutchenson, J.J. Dwyer, C.A. Rowe, and G.S. Wagner. 2010. A crust and upper mantle model of Eurasia and North Africa for Pn travel time calculation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 100 (2):640-656.

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). 2004. Life-Extension Refurbishment Program Completed for W87 Warheads [Press Release]. NNSA’s Life-Extension Program Meets Defense Needs Without Testing or New Weapon. November 19, 2004. Available at: http://www.nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/pressreleases/nnsas-life-extensionprogram-meets-defense-needs-without-testing-or-new-weapon.

National Nuclear Security Administration. 2009. Nuclear Security Enterprise Infrastructure. presentation to the committee, September 30, 2009, slide 12.

National Research Council (NRC). 1998. Seismic Signals from Mining Operations and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: Comments on a Draft Report by a Department of Energy Working Group. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2002. Technical Issues Related to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2003. Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2008. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2009. Internationalization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Goals, Strategies, and Challenges. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2010. Nuclear Forensics: A Capability at Risk. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council. 2012 (forthcoming). Assuring a Future US-based Nuclear Chemistry Expertise. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

Nichol, J. 2011. Russian Military Reform and Defense Policy. Congressional Research Service. Washington, D.C. R42006.

Nordyke, M.D. 1975. A review of Soviet data on the peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. Annals of Nuclear Energy 2 (9-10):657-660. IN651-IN655. 661-673.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Norris, R. and H. Kristensen. 2008. Russia Plans New Carriers, Subs to Boost Navy. Reuters, July 27, 2008. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists May/June 2009. 65 (3):55-64.

Norris, R.S. and H.M. Kristensen. 2008. French nuclear forces [Nuclear notebook]. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64 (4):52-55. Available at: http://bos.sagepub.com/content/64/4/52.full.

Norris, R.S. and H.M. Kristensen. 2011. Russian nuclear forces [Nuclear Notebook]. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (3):67-74. Available at: http://bos.sagepub.com/content/67/3/67.

Nuclear Threat Initiative Research Library. 2010. Country Profiles. [Online]. Available at: http://nti.org/e_research/profiles/.

Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). 2009. The People’s Liberation Army Navy: A Modern Navy with Chinese Characteristics. Washington, D.C. 52 pp. Available at: http://www.stormingmedia.us/14/1400/A140015.html.

Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). 2009. Military Power of the People’s Republic of China. U.S. Department of Defense Annual Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. 78 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Power_Report_2009.pdf.

Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2010. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2010. U.S. Department of Defense Annual Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. 83 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2010_CMPR_Final.pdf.

Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2011. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011. U.S. Department of Defense Annual Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. 94 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_cmpr_final.pdf.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), U.S. Congress. 1989. The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions. OTA-ISC-414. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.fas.org/ota/reports/8909.pdf. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. 1998. Seismic Verification of Nuclear Testing Treaties. OTA-ISC-361. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C.

Pasyanos, M.E. 2000. Predicting geophysical measurements: Testing a combined empirical and model-based approach using surface waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90 (3):790-796.

Pasyanos, M.E. and W.R. Walter. 2009. Improvements to regional explosion identification using attenuation models of the lithosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (14): Art. No. L14304. 5 pp. [doi:10.1029/2009GL038505].

Pasyanos, M.E., W.R. Walter, and E.M. Matzel. 2009. A simultaneous multiphase approach to determine P-wave and S-wave attenuation of the crust and upper mantle. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (6):3314-3325. [doi:10.1785/0120090061].

Perfilyev, N. 2009. START Process and Russian Strategic Force Modernization. June 15, 2009. Available at: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/start-process.

Phillips, W., X. Yang, G. Randall, H. Hartse, and R. Stead. 2009. Regional phase attenuation tomography for central and eastern Asia. 2009 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies. Los Alamos National Laboratory. pp. 536-546. Available at: http://na22.nnsa.doe.gov/prod/researchreview/2009/PAPERS/03-14.PDF.

Plenteda, R. 2002. A Monte Carlo Based Virtual Gamma Spectroscopy Laboratory. Ph.D. Thesis. Universitaetsbibliothek der Technischen Universitaet Wien, Resselgasse 4, A-1040. Vienna, Austria. Wien: Technische Universität Wien 118 pp.

Public Law 111-84: The National Defense Authorization Act of FY2010. (123 Stat. 2190, 10/28/2009). Section 1251. May 13, 2010.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Public Law 111-84: The national defense Authorization Act of FY 2010. (123 Stat. 2190, 10/28/2009). Update to Section 1251. November 17, 2010.

Richards, P.G. and W.-Y. Kim. 1997. Testing the nuclear test-ban treaty. Nature 389 (6653):781-782.

Richards, P.G. and W.-Y. Kim. 2007. Seismic signature. Nature Physics 3 (1):25 January 2007, p 4-6.

Richards, P.G., D.A. Anderson, and D.W. Simpson. 1992. A survey of blasting activity in the United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82 (3):1416-1433.

Richards, P.G., J. Armbruster, V. Burlacu, V.F. Cormier, M.D. Fisk, V.L. Khalturin, W.-Y. Kim, I.B. Morozov, E.A. Morozova, C.K. Saikia, D. Schaff, A. Stroujkova, and F. Waldhauser. 2003. Seismic location calibration for 30 international monitoring system stations in Eastern Asia: Final results. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Seismic Research Review-Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base. LA-UR-03-6029, 3-10:280-290. Available at: http://na22.nnsa.doe.gov/prod/researchreview/2003/papers/03-10.pdf.

Ringdal, F. 1986. Study of magnitudes, seismicity, and earthquake detectability using a global network. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 76 (6):1641-1659.

Ringdal, F. and P.G. Richards. 1993. The Ukrainian event of 16 September 1979. NORSAR Scientific Report. 1-92/93. pp. 120-124.

Ringdal, F., P.D. Marshall, and R.W. Alewine. 1992. Seismic yield determination of Soviet underground nuclear explosions at the Shagan River test site. Geophysical Journal International 109 (1):65-77.

Ringdal, F., T. Kvaerna, and B. Paulson. 2000. Seismic Events in the Barents Sea at and near the Site of the Kursk Submarine Accident on 12 August 2000. Semiannual Technical Summary 1 April — 30 September 2000, NORSAR Scientific Report. 1-2000/1001, Kjeller, Norway. pp. 77-88.

Romanowicz, B. and A.M. Dziewonski. 1987. Global digital seismographic network: Research opportunities and recent initiatives. In Composition, Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere-asthenosphere System. Fuchs, K. and C. Froidevaux (Eds.). A.G.U. Public, Geodynamics Series. 16: 99-110. Available at: http://www.fdsn.org/historical/fdsn_romanowicz_dziewonski_1987.pdf.

Russian Information Agency Novosti. (RIA Novosti). 2006. Sergei Ivanov visits Novaya Zemlya nuclear testing site. July 26, 2006. Viktor Litovkin, RIA Novosti military commentator. Available at: http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20060726/51869240.html.

Russian Information Agency Novosti. 2009. Russia to Continue Modernizing its Nuclear Deterrent—Deputy PM. February 25, 2009. Available at: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20090225/120296193.html.

Russian Information Agency Novosti. 2010. Russia Rules out Further Bulava Missile Tests Until November. May 24, 2010. Available at: http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20100524_4581.php.

Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces (Russian Forces). December 20, 2010. Strategic Fleet. Available at: http://russianforces.org/navy/.

Sarkozy, N. 2008. Speech Presentation of SSBM “Le Terrible.” Cherbourg, France, March 21, 2008. Available at: http://pastel.diplomatie.gouv.fr/editorial/actual/ael2/bulletin.gb.asp?liste=20080331.gb.html.

Schaff, D.P. 2008. Semiempirical statistics of correlation-detector performance. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98 (3):1495-1507. [doi:10.1785/0120060263].

Schaff, D.P. 2009. Broad-scale applicability of correlation detectors to China seismicity. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (11): Art. No. L11301. 5 pp. [doi:10.1029/2009GL038179].

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Schultz, C., S. Myers, J. Hipp, and C.J. Young. 1998. Nonstationary Bayesian kriging: A predictive technique to generate corrections for detection, location and discrimination. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 88:1275-1288.

Secretary of State for Defence. 2010. Adaptability and Partnership: Issues for the Strategic Defence Review. United Kingdom Ministry of Defence. February 3, 2010 (Cm 7794), sections 3, 16-3.1 L. 54 pp.

Sedillo, D. 2009. Report on the “Follow-up Audit of Test Readiness at the Nevada Test Site.” Memorandum to Manager, Nevada Site Office. National Nuclear Security Administration and Science Audits Division Office of Inspector General. Washington, D.C. October 21, 2009. Available at: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/igprod/documents/OAS-L-10-02.pdf.

Selby, N.D., D. Bowers, A. Douglas, R. Heyburn, and D. Porter. 2005. Seismic discrimination in southern Xinjiang: The 13 March 2003 Lop Nor earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95 (1):197-211.

Smith, A.T. 1993. Discrimination of explosions from simultaneous mining blasts. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 83 (1):160-179.

Sokolova, I.N. 2008. Investigation of dynamical parameters of seismic records of initial and repeated explosions. Journal of the National Nuclear Center of the Republic of Kazakhstan 1 (33): 73-78. (In Russian).

Stevens, J.L., J.R. Murphy, and N. Rimer. 1991. Seismic source characteristics of cavity decoupled explosions in salt and tuff. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 81 (4):1272-1291.

Styashkin, Y.M. 2002. Plutonium and uranium state equations for nuclear warhead calculations. Sarov ATOM. 21: 24-25. (In Russian).

Sultanov, D.D., J.R. Murphy, and K.D. Rubinstein. 1999. A seismic source summary for Soviet peaceful nuclear explosions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89 (3):640-647.

Sykes, L.R. 1996. Dealing with decoupled nuclear explosions under a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. In Monitoring a Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. NATO ASI Series E. Husebye, E.S. and A.M. Dainty (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, Netherlands. 303:247-293.

Sykes, L.R. 1997. Small earthquake near Russian test site leads to U.S. charges of cheating on Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty FAS Public Interest Report. 50 (6):1-12.

Sykes, L.R. 2002. Four decades of progress in seismic identification help verify the CTBT. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 83 (44):497-500.

Sykes, L.R., and M. Nettles. 2009. Dealing with Hard-to-identify Seismic Events Globally and those near Nuclear Test Sites. Poster presented at the International Scientific Studies Conference. Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ISS_2009/Poster/SEISMO-26J%20(US)%20-%20Lynn_Sykes%20and%20Meredith_Nettles.pdf.

Task Force on Leveraging the Scientific and Technological Capabilities of the NNSA National Laboratories for 21st Century National Security. 2009. Leveraging Science for Security: A Strategy for the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories in the 21st Century. Henry L. Stimson Center. Washington, D.C. Report Number 71.

Taylor, S.R. and H.E. Hartse. 1998. A procedure for estimation of source and propagation amplitude corrections for regional seismic discriminants. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth 103 (B2):2781-2789.

Taylor, S.R., A.A. Velasco, H.E. Hartse, W.S. Phillips, W.R. Walter, and A.J. Rodgers. 2002. Amplitude corrections for regional seismic discriminants. Pure and Applied Geophysics 159 (4):623-650.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

Thorn, R. and D. Westervelt. 1987. Hydronuclear Experiments. Report LA-10902-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, NM. 8 pp.

Thunborg, A. (Ed.). 2009. Science for Security: Verifying the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO.ISS Publication. International Scientific Studies Conference, 10-12 June 2009 Vienna, Austria.

Turnbull, L.S. 1995. Potential Comprehensive Test Ban Evasion Scenarios which could utilize Mines. Arms Control Intelligence Staff. Unclassified set of viewgraphs presented to mining officials in a public meeting. April 1995.

Turnbull, L.S. 2002. Monitoring for foreign nuclear explosions: The challenge of covering all environments. In Science, Technology, and National Security. Majumdar, S.K. (Ed.). Pennsylvania Academy of Science: Easton, PA pp.131-135.

Tyler, J. 2001. Annual certification takes a snapshot of stockpile’s health. Science and Technology Review. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA. July/August 2001. Available at: http://www.llnl.gov/str/JulAug01/Tyler.html.

United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (UK MOD). 2010. Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review. MOD: London, UK. October 2010. 75 pp. Available at: http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_191634.pdf?CID=PDF&PLA=furl&CRE=sdsr.

United Kingdom Ministry of Defence. 1998. Strategic Defence Review. MOD: London, UK. July 1998. 390 pp. Available at: http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/65F3D7AC-4340-4119-93A2-20825848E50E/0/sdr1998_complete.pdf.

United States Department of Defense (U.S. DOD). 2010a. Nuclear Posture Review Report. Washington, D.C. April 2010. 72 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/npr/docs/2010%20nuclear%20posture%20review%20report.pdf.

United States Department of Defense. 2010b. Fact Sheet: Increasing Transparency in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Stockpile. May 3, 2010. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/news/d20100503stockpile.pdf.

United States Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Energy (DOE). 2008. National Security and Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C. September 2008. 28 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/news/nuclearweaponspolicy.pdf.

United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). 1996. Radiological Effluents Released from U.S. Continental Tests 1961 through 1992. DOE/NV-317 (Rev.1)UC-702. 304pp.

United States Department of Energy. 2004. National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Research and Engineering Program: Strategic Plan. DOE/NNSA/NA-22-NEMRE-2004. September 2004. 16 pp. Available at: http://na22.nnsa.doe.gov/prod/nemre/documents/fileshar/stratpln.pdf.

United States Department of Energy. 2009. Nuclear Test Readiness: Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, D.C. April 2009. 6 pp.

United States Department of Energy. 2010. FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request: Budget Highlights. Office of the Chief Financial Officer. Washington, D.C. February 2010. 92 pp. Available at: http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/11budget/Content/FY2011Highlights.pdf.

United States Department of Energy. 2011. Nuclear Test Readiness: Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, D.C. May 2011. 6 pp.

United States Department of State. 1974. Protocol to the Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Underground Nuclear Weapons Tests. Treaties and Other International Acts Series 12646. Washington, D.C.: GPO. Moscow, July 3, 1974. International legal materials 13: 908-909.

United States Department of State. 1997. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, opened for signature and signed by the United States at New York on September 24, 1996. Treaty

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

            includes two Annexes, a Protocol, and two Annexes to the Protocol. 105-128. Treaties and Other International Acts Series. Washington, D.C.: GPO.

United States Department of State. 2010a. Annual Report on Implementation of the Moscow Treaty. Washington, D.C. 5 pp. Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/141641.pdf.

United States Department of State. 2010b. Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed in Prague on April 8, 2010. Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/140035.pdf

United States Department of State. 2011a. “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms (as of September 2011)” The New START Treaty. Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance. October 20, 2011. Available at: http://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/175945.htm.

United States Department of State. 2011b. “Key P-5 Public Statements on CTBT Scope” Fact Sheet. Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance. September 29, 2011. Available at: http://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/173945.htm.

United States Department of State. Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) Article-by-article analysis of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/16522.htm.

United States Secretary of Defense Task Force on DOD Nuclear Weapons Management. 2008. Phase II: Review of the DOD Nuclear Mission. Washington, D.C. December 2008. 108 pp. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/PhaseIIReportFinal.pdf.

Upp, D.L., R.M. Keyser, and T.R. Twomey. 2005. New cooling methods for HPGE detectors and associated electronics. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 264 (1):121-126.

Verification Research, Training and Information Centre (VERTIC). 2008. CTBT On-site Inspections: Experiences from Kazakhstan. Presentation. Available at: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/public_information/2008/IFE08/VERTIC_presentation_osi_ife08.pdf.

Waldhauser, F. 2009. Near-real-time double-difference event location using long-term seismic archives, with application to Northern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (5):2736-2748.

Waldhauser, F., D. Schaff, P.G. Richards, and W.-Y. Kim. 2004. Lop Nor revisited: Underground nuclear explosion locations, 1976-1996, from double-difference analysis of regional and teleseismic data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94 (5):1879-1889.

Walter, W.R. and S.R. Taylor. 2001. A revised magnitude and distance amplitude correction (MDAC2) procedure for regional seismic discriminants: Theory and testing at NTS. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-146882. Available at: www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240563.pdf.

Walter, W., E. Matzel, M. Pasyanos, D. Harris, R. Gok, and S. Ford. 2007. Empirical observations of earthquake-explosion discrimination using P/S ratios and implications for the sources of explosion S-waves. In Proceedings of the 29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies. 684-693. Available at: http://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=690834.

Wen, L. and H. Long. 2010. High precision location of North Korea’s 2009 nuclear test. Seismological Research Letters 81 (1):26-29.

World Nuclear Association. 2009. World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements. December 1, 2009. [Online]. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/default.aspx?id=11520.

Zähringer, M. and G. Kirchner. 2008. Nuclide ratios and source identification from high-resolution gamma-ray spectra with Bayesian decision methods. Nuclear Instruments and

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×

            Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 594 (3):400-406.

Zähringer, M., A. Becker, M. Nikkinen, P. Saey, and G. Wotawa. 2009. CTBT radioxenon monitoring for verification: Today’s challenges. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 282 (3):737-742.

Zerbo, L. 2006. Examining the Effectiveness of the CTBT Verification Regime: The Results of the First System-wide Performance Test (SPT1). Presentation. VERTIC seminar: Verifying the Comprehensive Nuclear Ban: 10 Years of Development. United Nations Secretariat, New York, NY.

Zharkov, M.A. 1984. Paleozoic Salt Bearing Formations of the World. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. 427 pp. (Translated from Russian).

Zhou, R.-M., B.W. Stump, and C.T. Hayward. 2006. Ms:Mb discrimination study of mining explosions in Wyoming, USA, and in QianAn, China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96 (5):1742-1752.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 190
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 191
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 192
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 193
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 194
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 195
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 196
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 197
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIX I References." National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12849.
×
Page 198
Next: APPENDIX J List of Acronyms »
The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $45.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This report reviews and updates the 2002 National Research Council report, Technical Issues Related to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). This report also assesses various topics, including:

  • the plans to maintain the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile without nuclear-explosion testing;
  • the U.S. capability to detect, locate, and identify nuclear explosions;
  • commitments necessary to sustain the stockpile and the U.S. and international monitoring systems; and
  • potential technical advances countries could achieve through evasive testing and unconstrained testing.

Sustaining these technical capabilities will require action by the National Nuclear Security Administration, with the support of others, on a strong scientific and engineering base maintained through a continuing dynamic of experiments linked with analysis, a vigorous surveillance program, adequate ratio of performance margins to uncertainties. This report also emphasizes the use of modernized production facilities and a competent and capable workforce with a broad base of nuclear security expertise.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!