National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Summary
Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Perspectives from United Kingdom and United States Policy Makers on Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12861.
×

1
Introduction

Obesity affects the health and well-being of individuals in the United States and the United Kingdom and has a growing impact on the health care expenditures and overall economies of both countries. Over the past few years, researchers, health professionals, policy makers, and many others have tried to understand the underlying causes of the problem and to develop effective strategies for preventing and reducing obesity in children and adults. A recent leveling off in the prevalence of obesity in children may indicate that this focus on the problem is bearing results, although it is generally acknowledged that any significant change will take time.

SETTING THE STAGE

On October 22, 2009, policy makers, researchers, and program staff from the United States and the United Kingdom came together at the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies in Washington, DC, to share perspectives and experiences in addressing the obesity problem. The workshop provided insight into the similarities and differences in how the two countries are addressing obesity prevention and was a forum for a comparative understanding of obesity-related policies. The IOM Standing Committee on Childhood Obesity Prevention felt it would be informative to learn about challenges and promising approaches from both a British perspective and American perspective given the two countries similarity in obesity rates. (See Appendix A for the workshop agenda.) The workshop

Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Perspectives from United Kingdom and United States Policy Makers on Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12861.
×

was hosted by the Standing Committee and the UK Department of Health and planned by a committee appointed by the IOM.

Standing Committee Chair Jeffrey Koplan, Vice President for Global Health and Director of the Global Health Institute at Emory University, set as goals of the workshop to share current concerns and the status of interventions, address emerging issues, and discuss potential opportunities for collaboration.

To launch the workshop, Richard Gephardt, former Majority Leader of the US House of Representatives, highlighted some of the issues involved in what he described as a “crisis epidemic,” yet one that research and innovative programs can successfully address. He cited several companies that support programs designed to reduce tobacco use and encourage healthier eating and physical activity. One tangible benefit for these companies is slower growth in their health insurance costs. Gephart suggested that, from a policy point of view, progress will occur, but it will take time. National recognition of the scale of the obesity problem, including its role in health care costs, will be necessary. Attacking the problem will also require policy and programmatic strategies to change behaviors and research to understand the physiological, psychosocial, societal, and environmental reasons for unhealthy eating and low levels of physical activity.

REPORT ORGANIZATION

This summary generally follows the organization of the workshop. After an overview of the scope of the problem in the two countries (Chapter 2), Chapter 3 highlights government efforts that touch, in various ways, people’s diet and physical activity. The next two chapters describe policies and programs that relate to school meals (Chapter 4) and the built environment (Chapter 5). Chapter 6 provides case examples of national-level policies and programs related to nutrition and physical activity, while Chapter 7 offers several case examples of local-level policies and programs in the United States. Finally, Chapter 8 summarizes closing remarks that point to similarities and differences between the two countries in approaches to preventing obesity.

The aim of the workshop was not to present an exhaustive listing of all policies and programs related to obesity prevention. Rather, by focusing on promising approaches and identifying current gaps and challenges, the workshop was intended to give participants, as well as readers of this summary, useful ideas to consider in each country’s context.

Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Perspectives from United Kingdom and United States Policy Makers on Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12861.
×
Page 7
Suggested Citation:"1 Introduction." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Perspectives from United Kingdom and United States Policy Makers on Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12861.
×
Page 8
Next: 2 Scope of the Problem »
Perspectives from United Kingdom and United States Policy Makers on Obesity Prevention: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Both the United Kingdom and the United States are grappling with nationwide epidemics of obesity. Obesity contributes to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers, among other diseases. Although many people are aware of obesity's causes and consequences, few see it as a problem for their own families--despite clinical evidence to the contrary. Given this disconnect between perception and reality, policy makers in both countries struggle to find a way to reach people to encourage change.

The IOM brought together policy makers from the U.K. and U.S. for a workshop on October 22, 2009, to discuss the challenges of and promising approaches to the struggle against obesity. Presenters spoke about current policies, programs, and partnerships that are addressing the obesity epidemic and evidence for effective strategies to change perception and behaviors. The workshop, summarized in this document, provided an opportunity for both countries to learn from each other's efforts and to consider how to apply new strategies at home.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!