References

Abramson, F. H. (2004, November 17). Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Summary Results. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.census.gov/pred/www/rpts/TXE%20Program%20Summary.pdf.

Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Anderson, M. J. (Ed.) (2000). Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Angueira, T. (2003, May). Reengineering the Decennial Census: The Baseline Design for 2010. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series, Number 14. Version 1.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bailar, B. A. (2000). Census testing. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 62–66. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Bauder, M. and D. Judson (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Household Level Analysis. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bentley, M. and J. G. Tancreto (2005). Census 2000 nonresponse follow-up: Discrepancies in enumerator assigned housing unit status. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Berning, M. A. (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Request for Physical Address Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Berning, M. A. and R. H. Cook (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Process Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 319
References Abramson, F. H. (2004, November 17). Census 2000 Testing, Experimenta- tion, and Evaluation Program Summary Results. Washington, DC: U.S. Cen- sus Bureau. Available: http://www.census.gov/pred/www/rpts/TXE%20Program% 20Summary.pdf. Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Anderson, M. J. (Ed.) (2000). Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Angueira, T. (2003, May). Reengineering the Decennial Census: The Baseline Design for 2010. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series, Number 14. Version 1.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Bailar, B. A. (2000). Census testing. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 62–66. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Bauder, M. and D. Judson (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Household Level Analysis. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Bentley, M. and J. G. Tancreto (2005). Census 2000 nonresponse follow-up: Dis- crepancies in enumerator assigned housing unit status. In Proceedings of the Sec- tion on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Associa- tion. Berning, M. A. (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Request for Physical Address Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Berning, M. A. and R. H. Cook (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Process Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. 319

OCR for page 319
320 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS Box, G. E. P. and J. S. Hunter (1961). The 2 k − p fractional factorial designs. part I (Corr. V5 p417). Technometrics 3, 311–351. Brudvig, L. (2003). Analysis of the Social Security Number Validation Component of the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Cen- sus 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Buscher, M. and H. Stamm (2001). E-census: The 2000 census on the Internet— concept and stock-taking. Paper contributed to the Second Swiss eGovernment Symposium, August 22, 2001, Zurich. Bye, B. V. and D. H. Judson (2004). Results from the Administrative Records Exper- iment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Cabinet Office (2008, December). Helping to Shape Tomorrow: The 2011 Census of Population and Housing in England and Wales. Presented to Parliament by the Minister to the Cabinet Office and laid before the National Assembly for Wales by the Minister for Finance and Public Service Delivery. London: Cabinet Office. Caspar, R. A. (2003). Synthesis of Results from the Response Mode and Incentive Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Re- port. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Caspar, R. A. (2004). Results from the Response Mode and Incentive Experiment in 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Citro, C. F. (2000). Coverage improvement procedures. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 101–104. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Crowley, M. (2003). Generation X Speaks Out on Civic Engagement and the De- cennial Census: An Ethnographic Approach. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. de la Puente, M. and R. McKay (1995). Developing and testing race and ethnic origin questions from the Current Population Survey Supplement on Race and Ethnic Origin. In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley. Dillman, D. A., J. R. Clark, and M. D. Sinclair (1993a). The 1992 simplified ques- tionnaire test: Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design and re- quest for Social Security numbers on completion rates. In Proceedings of the 1993 Bureau of the Census Annual Research Conference, pp. 8–17. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 321 Dillman, D. A., J. R. Clark, and M. D. Sinclair (1993b). How prenotice letters, stamped envelopes and reminder postcards affect mailback response rates for cen- sus questionnaires. In Annual Research Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Dillman, D. A., J. R. Clark, and J. B. Treat (1994). Influence of 13 design factors on completion rates to decennial census questionnaires. Paper presented at the Annual Research Conference of the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Arlington, Va. (March). Dolson, D. (2006). Efficient multi mode data collection in a census context. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Duquet, L. and G. Gilmour (2007, April). 2006 census online project. Presentation at the Statistics Canada IT Conference. Durand, E. D. (1910, April 9). The census and the social worker. The Survey 24, 81–84. Geographical (2004, October). Counting on the public: Although the 2001 census used new techniques to produce the most complete survey of the UK population, its statisticians still encountered problems [note]. Geographical. Reprinted: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3120/is_10_76/ai_n29121905/ ?tag=content;col1. Ericksen, E. P., L. F. Estrada, J. W. Tukey, and K. M. Wolter (1991). Report on the 1990 Decennial Census and the Post-Enumeration Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Gerber, E. (2003). Privacy Schemas and Data Collection: An Ethnographic Account. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Gerber, E., A. Dajani, and M. A. Scaggs (2002). An Experiment to Improve Cover- age Through Revised Roster Instructions. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Goldfield, E. D. and D. M. Pemberton (2000a). 1950 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 143–148. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Goldfield, E. D. and D. M. Pemberton (2000b). 1960 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 148–153. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Griffin, D. H., D. P. Fischer, and M. T. Morgan (2001). Testing an Internet response option for the American Community Survey. Paper presented at American Associ- ation for Public Opinion Research annual conference, Montreal, May 17–20. Griffin, D. H. and S. M. Obenski (2001, September 28). A Demonstration of the Operational Feasibility of the American Community Survey. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

OCR for page 319
322 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS Groves, R. M. (2009, October 7). 2010 Census: A Status Update of Key Decen- nial Operations. Prepared statement before the Subcommittee on Federal Finan- cial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Sen- ate: U.S. Census Bureau. Accessible: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/ releases/pdf/GrovesCensusSenateTestimony10-7.pdf. Guarino, J. (2001). Assessing the Impact of Differential Incentives and Alternative Data Collection Modes on Census Response. Census 2000 Testing, Experimenta- tion, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Guarino, J. A., J. M. Hill, and H. F. Woltman (2001). Analysis of the Social Security Number Notification Component of the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evalu- ation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Hacker, J. D. (2000a). 1850 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 123–125. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Hacker, J. D. (2000b). 1870 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 127–129. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Heimovitz, H. K. (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Outcomes Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Hill, J. M. and J. D. Machowski (2003, September 29). Master Trace Sample. Census 2000 Evaluation B.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Hill, J. M., J. G. Tancreto, and C. Rothhaas (2006). Experimental treatment re- sults for the age, relationship, and tenure items from the 2005 National Census Test. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3130–3137. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Jackson, A. A. (2008, August 14). 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Exper- iments. 2010 Decennial Census Program Decision Memorandum Series No. 24. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Jenkins, R. (1983). Procedural History of the 1940 Census of Population and Hous- ing. Prepared at Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin– Madison. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Jenkins, R. M. (2000). 1940 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 140–143. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Judson, D. H. and B. Bye (2003, October 21). Synthesis of Results from the Admin- istrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 323 Karl, L., E. A. Krejsa, and A. Landreth (2005). Design of the 2004 Coverage Research Followup questionnaire. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3172–3179. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Kim, J., E. T. Huang, and K. Marquis (1998). Evaluation of the 1996 Community Census administrative records file. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 196–201. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Kincannon, C. L. (2006, June 6). The 2010 decennial census program. Prepared statement, testimony before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, and International Security of the Committee on Home- land Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Knight, L. M., J. T. Behler, and F. A. Vitrano (2005). Operational assessment of the 2004 Coverage Research Followup. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Re- search Methods, pp. 3228–3234. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Kurihara, N. (2004). Some issues in the 2005 population census of Japan. Statistics Bureau, Japan. Laroche, D. (2005). Evaluation report on Internet option of 2004 census test: Char- acteristics of electronic questionnaires, non-response rates, follow-up rates, and qualitative issues. Working Paper 23, Work Session on Statistical Data Editing. Ottawa: United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians. Larwood, L. and S. Trentham (2004). Results from the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program. Topic Report 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Magnuson, D. L. (2000a). Decennial censuses: 1910 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 135–136. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Magnuson, D. L. (2000b). Decennial censuses: 1930 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 139–140. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Martin, E. (2002). Questionnaire Effects on Reporting of Race and Hispanic Origin: Results of a Replication of the 1990 Mail Short Form in Census 2000. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Cen- sus Bureau. Martin, E. (2007, July 25). Final Report of an Experiment: Effects of a Revised In- struction, Deadline, and Final Question Series in the Decennial Mail Short Form. Research Report Series—Survey Methodology #2007-25 and 2010 Census Mem- oranda Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Martin, E., E. Gerber, and C. Redline (2003, August 28). Synthesis Report: Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment. Census 2000 Alternative Question- naire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

OCR for page 319
324 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS Martin, E., D. Sheppard, M. Bentley, and C. Bennett (2003). Results of 2003 Na- tional Census Test of Race and Hispanic Questions. Unpublished report, dated October 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. McKay, R. and M. de la Puente (1995). Research improves questions. Civil Rights Journal 1(1). McMillen, D. (2000). Apportionment and redistricting. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 34–42. Washington, DC: CQ Press. MITRE Corporation (2007, January 17). An assessment of the risks, costs, and ben- efits of including the Internet as a response option in the 2010 decennial census. Version 2.0. Report prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau. Moraleda, A. G. (2006). Census data collecting by Internet: Spanish experience in 2001. Working Paper 12, Work Session on Electronic Raw Data Reporting. Geneva: United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians. Mule, T. (2002, December 31). A.C.E. Revision II Results: Further Study of Person Duplication. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-51. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Mule, T., T. Schellhammer, D. Malec, and J. Maples (2007, March 6). Using Contin- uous Variables as Modeling Covariates for Net Coverage Estimation. DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-E-09-RI. Washing- ton, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Mulry-Liggan, M. (1986). Overview and Summary of the Forward Trace Study. Sta- tistical Research Division Report Series, Number Census/SRD/RR-86-24. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Nash, F. F. (2000). Overview of the Duplicate Housing Unit Operations. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. National Research Council (1978). Counting the People in 1980: An Appraisal of Census Plans. Panel on Decennial Census Plans, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1985). The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Constance F. Citro and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1988). Priorities for the 1990 Census: Research, Evalu- ation, and Experimentation (REX) Program. Panel on Decennial Census Method- ology, Constance F. Citro and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 325 National Research Council (1994). Counting People in the Information Age. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methods, Duane L. Steffey and Norman M. Brad- burn, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1995). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Cen- sus Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, Barry Edmonston and Charles Schultze, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1997). Preparing for the 2000 Census: Interim Report II. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methodologies, Andrew A. White and Keith F. Rust, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1999). Measuring a Changing Nation: Modern Methods for the 2000 Census. Panel on Alternative Census Methodologies, Michael L. Co- hen, Andrew A. White, and Keith F. Rust, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (2003). Planning the 2010 Census: Second Interim Re- port. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2004a). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2004b). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Chal- lenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2006). Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place: Resi- dence Rules in the Decennial Census. Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, Daniel L. Cork and Paul R. Voss, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2007). Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the Ameri- can Community Survey. Constance F. Citro and Graham Kalton, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2008a). Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census. Panel on Correlation Bias and Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Decennial Cen- sus, Robert M. Bell and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics,

OCR for page 319
326 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2008b). Experimentation and Evaluation Plans for the 2010 Census. Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Lawrence D. Brown, Michael L. Cohen, and Daniel L. Cork, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2009a, February 19). Letter from Lawrence D. Brown to Thomas H. Mesenbourg, acting director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel on the De- sign of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Lawrence D. Brown, Michael L. Cohen, and Daniel L. Cork, eds. Committee on National Statis- tics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2009b). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency (4th ed.). Committee on National Statistics, Constance F. Citro, Miron L. Straf, and Margaret E. Martin, eds. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Statistical Office, Republic of Korea (2006, November). E-Census as a New Approach to the Population and Housing Census of Korea. Paper presented at 11th Meeting of the Heads of National Statistical Offices of East Asian Countries. Tokyo: Korea National Statistical office. Office for National Statistics (2004, March). Information Paper: The 2011 Census: A Design for England and Wales. London: Office for National Statistics. Pennington, R. A. (2005). Unduplication of persons and housing units in the 2004 Census Test. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3470– 3475. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Raglin, D. A. (1998a). The effect of a household-level screening question on the prevalence rate of an item. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Meth- ods, pp. 398–403. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Raglin, D. A. (1998b). Using the 1996 National Content Survey to measure the impact of alternative skip patterns on the collection of employment data. In Pro- ceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 342–407. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Redline, C., D. A. Dillman, A. Dajani, and M. A. Scaggs (2002). The Effects of Al- tering the Design of Branching Instructions on Navigational Performance in Census 2000. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Reichert, J. W. (2009). Status of the 2010 CPEX evaluations. Presentation to the Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Experiments and Evaluations, February 17, 2009, Washington, DC.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 327 Rodriguez, C. E. (1994, February 17–18). Challenges and emerging issues: Race and ethnic identity among Latinos. In Proceedings from the Workshop on Race and Ethnicity Classification: An Assessment of the Federal Standards for Race and Ethnicity Classification. Washington, DC. Schneider, S., D. Cantor, P. Segel, C. Arieira, and L. Nguyen (2002). Response Mode and Incentive Experiment for Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimenta- tion, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Schwede, L. (2003, August 27). Complex Households and Relationships in the Decen- nial Census and in Ethnographic Studies of Six Race/Ethnic Groups. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Smith, I. (2006). Using both Internet and field collection methods for the 2006 census of population and dwellings. Invited paper for the Population Association of New Zealand Conference, Statistics New Zealand. Statistics Canada (2007). Census technology: Recent developments and implications on census methodology—census on the net. Paper presented for the tenth session of the Economic Commission for Europe, Conference of European Statisticians, Group of Experts on Population and Housing Censuses. ECE/CES/GE 41/2007/9. Statistics New Zealand (2007). Implications of the Internet census for the manage- ment of field operations. Paper prepared for the Joint UNECE/Eurostat Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses, Kazakhstan, June 4–6, 2007. Stukel, D. (2008, August). Projected Census Dates, Funding Requirements and Sources, and Technical Assistance Needs for the 2010 Round of Population and Housing Censuses. New York: United Nations Statistics Division. Swain, L., J. D. Drew, B. Lafrance, and K. Lance (1992). The creation of a residential address register for coverage improvement in the 1991 Canadian census. Survey Methodology 18, 127–141. Tancreto, J. G. (2006). An overview of the 2005 National Census Test. In Proceed- ings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3764–3771. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Tancreto, J. G. and M. Bentley (2005). Determining the effectiveness of multiple nonresponse follow-up contact attempts on response and quality. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3626–3632. Alexandria, VA: Ameri- can Statistical Association. Treat, J. B. (1993). 1993 National Census Test Appeals and Long-Form Experiment, Long-Form Component, Final Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. Treat, J. B., S. Brady, J. A. Bouffard, and C. Stapleton (2003). 2003 National Census Test: The Impact of Alternative Modes and Contact Strategies on Self-Response. Unpublished report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

OCR for page 319
328 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS Trentham, S. and L. Larwood (2003). Synthesis of Results from the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Trewin, D. (2006). How Australia Takes a Census. Report 2903.0. Canberra: Aus- tralian Bureau of Statistics. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2006). Conference of European Statisticians: Recommendations for the 2010 censuses of population and housing. Prepared in cooperation with the Statistical Office of the European Communities. ECE/CES/STAT/NONE/2006/4. New York and Geneva: United Nations. U.S. Census Bureau (1955). The 1950 Censuses—How They Were Taken. Procedural Studies of the 1950 Censuses, No. 2; Population, Housing, Agriculture, Irrigation, Drainage. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau (1963). Evaluation and Research Program of the U.S. Censuses of Population and Housing, 1960: Background, Procedures, and Forms. ER 60–1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Census Bureau (1966). 1960 Censuses of Population and Housing: Procedural History. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Census Bureau (1974). 1970 Censuses of Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Program: Effect of Special Procedures to Improve Coverage in the 1970 Census. PHC(E)-6. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau (1976). Procedural History PHC(R)-1, 1970 Census of Popula- tion and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Census Bureau (1986–1989). 1980 Census of Population and Housing: History. PHC80-R-2. Issued in parts. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (1993). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part A. 1990 CPH-R-2A. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau (1995a, October). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part B. 1990 CPH-R-2B. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Com- merce. U.S. Census Bureau (1995b, October). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part C. 1990 CPH-R-2C. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Com- merce. U.S. Census Bureau (1996, March). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part D. 1990 CPH-R-2D. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Com- merce.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 329 U.S. Census Bureau (1997). Results of the 1996 Race and Ethnic Targeted Test. Pop- ulation Division Working Paper 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Com- merce. U.S. Census Bureau (1999, January). Census 2000 Operational Plan Using Traditional Census-Taking Methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau (2001, June). Potential Life Cycle Savings for the 2010 Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2003, February). Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Summary Documentation: Program Modifications Since May 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2005, September). Estimated Life Cycle Costs for Reengineering the 2010 Decennial Census Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2007, February). U.S. Census Bureau: Budget Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008, Congressional Submission. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2008a, February). U.S. Census Bureau: Budget Estimates, Fiscal Year 2009, Congressional Submission. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2008b, June). U.S. Census Bureau: Periodic Censuses and Pro- grams Budget Amendment, Fiscal Year 2009, Congressional Submission. Washing- ton, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2009a, April 22). Letter from Thomas L. Mesenbourg, acting director, to Lawrence D. Brown, Chair, Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments. With enclosure: “U.S. Census Bureau Response to The National Academies Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT) on the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments (CPEX) Panel Rec- ommendations.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau (2009b, May). U.S. Census Bureau: Budget Estimates, Fiscal Year 2010, Congressional Submission. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor (1911). Reports of the Department of Commerce and Labor, 1910: Report of the Secretary of Commerce and Labor and Reports of Bureaus. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General (2006). Enumerating Group Quarters Continues to Pose Challenges. Final Inspection Report No. IPE- 18046. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. General Accounting Office (1994, September). Decennial Census: 1995 Test Census Presents Opportunities to Evaluate New Census-Taking Methods. State- ment of William M. Hunt before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Census, Statis- tics, and Postal Personnel. GAO/T-GGD-94-136. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

OCR for page 319
330 ENVISIONING THE 2020 CENSUS U.S. General Accounting Office (2000, February). 2000 Census: New Data Capture System Progress and Risks. GAO/AIMD-00-61. Washington, DC: U.S. Govern- ment Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008, July). 2010 Census: Census Bureau’s Decision to Continue with Handheld Computers for Address Canvassing Makes Planning and Testing Critical. Report GAO-08-936. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009a, October 7). 2010 Census: Census Bureau Continues to Make Progress in Mitigating Risks to a Successful Enumer- ation, but Still Faces Various Challenges. Report GAO-10-132T. Testimony of Robert Goldenkoff before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security, Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009b, November). 2010 Census: Census Bureau Has Made Progress on Schedule and Operational Control Tools, but Needs to Prioritize Remaining System Requirements. Report GAO-10-59. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009c, July). High-Risk Series: Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service to Achieve Sustainable Financial Viability (New). GAO-09- 937SP. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009d, March 5). Information Technology: Census Bureau Needs to Strengthen Testing of 2010 Decennial Systems. Report GAO-09-413T. Testimony of David A. Powner and Robert Goldenkoff before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Fed- eral Services and International Security, Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Of- fice. Weinberg, D. H. (2008). Early thoughts on a research and testing strategy for the 2020 census. Presentation to the Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Experiments and Evaluations, November 10, 2008, Washington, DC. Wells, R. V. (2000). 1790 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 115–116. Washington, DC: CQ Press. West, K. K., J. G. Robinson, and M. Bentley (2005). Did proxy respondents cause age heaping in the census 2000? In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 3658–3665. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Whitford, D. C. (1996). The 1996 Integrated Coverage Measurement test. In Pro- ceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 389–393. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

OCR for page 319
REFERENCES 331 Whitworth, E. (2002, August 14). Internet Data Collection. Census 2000 Evaluation A.2.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Williams, P. (2006). The Australian 2006 census and the Internet. Working Paper 9, Work Session on Electronic Raw Data Reporting. Geneva: United Nations Sta- tistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe and Conference of European Statisticians.

OCR for page 319