References

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Report of the Project 2061 Phase 1. Washington, DC: Author.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). R&D budget and policy program FY 2010 appropriations: Department of Education. Available: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/09ptbii18.pdf [accessed November 2009].

American Geological Institute. (2009). Status of the geoscience workforce 2009 edition. Washington, DC: Author.

Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2006). National defense education and innovation initiative: Meeting America’s economic and security challenges in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.

Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. Available: http://www.aacu.org/advocacy/leap/documents/GlobalCentury_final.pdf [accessed May 2007].

Ball, D.L., and Cohen, D.K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Bang, M., Medin, D.L., and Atran S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(35), 13868-13874.

Bardach, E., and Lesser, C. (1996). Accountability in human services collaboration: For what? And to whom? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 197-224.

Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 81-93.

Belden, L., Blaustein A., Olson, D.H., Green, D.H., Root, T.L., and Kiesecker, J.M. (2001). Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conservation Biology, 115, 1804-1809.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 151
References American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Report of the Project 0 Phase . Washington, DC: Author. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science lit- eracy. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). R&D budget and policy pro- gram FY 00 appropriations: Department of Education. Available: http://www.aaas. org/spp/rd/09ptbii18.pdf [accessed November 2009]. American Geological Institute. (2009). Status of the geoscience workforce 00 edition. Washington, DC: Author. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2006). National defense education and innovation initiative: Meeting America’s economic and security challenges in the st century. Washington, DC: Author. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Educa- tion and America’s Promise. Available: http://www.aacu.org/advocacy/leap/documents/ GlobalCentury_final.pdf [accessed May 2007]. Ball, D.L., and Cohen, D.K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Bang, M., Medin, D.L., and Atran S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 0(35), 13868-13874. Bardach, E., and Lesser, C. (1996). Accountability in human services collaboration: For what? And to whom? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, (2), 197-224. Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, (1), 81-93. Belden, L., Blaustein A., Olson, D.H., Green, D.H., Root, T.L., and Kiesecker, J.M. (2001). Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conservation Biology, , 1804-1809. 

OCR for page 151
 NASA’S ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM Bennett, C. (1975). Up the hierarchy. Journal of Extension, (2), 7-12. Bennett, C. (1979). Analyzing impacts of extension programs. Science and Education Admin- istration (#ESC-57). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Bennett, C., and Rockwell, K. (1995). Targeting outcomes of programs (TOP): An integrated approach to planning and evaluation. Available: http://citnews.unl.edu/TOP/english/ index.html [accessed April 2010]. Bogner, F.X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term vari- ables of environmental perspective. Journal of Environmental Education, (4), 17-29. Bord, S., Horner, A., Beavan, S., and Compston, J. (2001). Estrogen receptors α and β are differentially expressed in developing human bone. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, , 2309-2314. Brackett, A. (2009). Review of NOAA education program evaluation reports. Paper pre- pared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/ NOAA%20Evaluation.pdf [accessed March 2010]. Brinkerhoff, J.M. (2002). Partnership for international development: Rhetoric or results. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Building Engineering and Science Talent. (2004). A bridge for all: Higher education design principles to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering and mathemat- ics. San Diego: Author. Available: http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/BEST_Bridge forAll_HighEdFINAL.pdf [accessed May 2007]. Business Roundtable. (2005, July 16). Tapping America’s potential: The education for innova- tion initiative. Washington, DC: Author. Cammen, L. (2008). NOAA Sea Grant education: Evaluation overview. Available: http:// www.seagrant.noaa.gov/other/admininfo/presentations/NRCpresentationLeonCammen. pdf [accessed October 2009]. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Carnegie-IAS Commission on Mathematic and Science Education. (2009). The opportunity equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Available: http://www.opportunityequation.org/ [accessed October 2009]. Center for Children and Technology. (2003). JASON multimedia science curriculum’s impact on student learning: Final evaluation report, year three. New York: Author. Center on Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruc- tion in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Author. Clune, B. (2009). Logic models of NOAA education programs and implications for restructur- ing. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies. org/bose/NOAA%20Logic%20Model.pdf [accessed March 2010]. Coley, J.D., Vitkin, A.Z., Seaton, C.E., and Yopchick, J.E. (2005). Effects of experience on relational inferences in children: The case of folk biology. In B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou, and M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Sci- ence Society (pp. 471-475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Congressional Research Service. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Available: http:// assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL33434_20080321.pdf [accessed October 2009]. Coral Reef Conservation Program. (2007). Coral Reef Conservation Program 00-00 External review: Final report. Available: http://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/strategy/ reprioritization/exreview/resources/summary_report.pdf [accessed March 2009]. Cronbach, L. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Fran- cisco: Jossey-Bass.

OCR for page 151
 REFERENCES Cucker, B. (2001). Steps to increasing minority participation in the aquatic sciences: Catch- ing up with shifting demographics. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 0, 17-21. Day-Miller, E., and Payne, D. (2008). Final evaluation report for the NOAA Ocean Explora- tion and Research Professional Development Institutes. Unpublished report. Dickerson, D.L., and Dawkins, K.R. (2004). Use of scientific fieldwork in designing high- quality professional development programs. Teacher Education Journal of South Caro- lina, 52-56. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M.Y., Sanders, D., and Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, , 107-111. Dorph, R., Goldstein, D., Lee, S., Lepori, K., Schneider, S., and Venkatesan, S. (2007). The status of science education in the Bay Area: Research brief. Berkeley: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California. Eberbach, C., and Crowley, K. (2005). From living to virtual: Learning from museum objects. Curator, (3), 317-338. Education Trust. (2008). Core problems: Out-of-field teaching persists in key academic courses and high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: Author. Edwards, C.H. (1997). Promoting student inquiry. Science Teacher, (7), 18-21. Falk, J.H., and Dierking, L.D. (2000). Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology. (1992). Policies and pro- cedures manual. Available: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_ storage_01/0000019b/80/15/41/fc.pdf [accessed October 2009]. Fortus, D., Hug, B., Krajcik, J., Kuhn, L., McNeill, K., Reiser, B., Rivet, A., Rogat, A., Schwartz, C., and Shwartz, Y. (2006). Sequencing and supporting complex scientific inquiry practices in instructional materials for middle school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, April. Available: http://www.umich.edu/~hiceweb/iqwst/Papers/NARST2006_ Learning_progress.pdf [accessed February 2010]. Fox Keller, E. (1995). Reflections on gender and science: 0th anniversary edition. New Ha- ven, CT: Yale University Press. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., and Kwang, S. (2001). What makes profes- sional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, (4), 915-945. Gentner, D., and Colhoun, J. (2008). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, and A.V. Muller (Eds.), On thinking: volume . Towards a theory of thinking. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Gentner, D., and Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 0, 277-300. Gerhart, M., Saxe, G.B., Seltzer, M., Schlackman, J., Ching, C.C., Nasir, N.N., Fall, R., Ben- nett, T., Rhine, S., and Slone, T.F. (1999). Opportunities to learn fractions in elemen- tary mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 0(3), 286-315. Gilligan, M.G., Verity, P.G., Cook, C.B., Cook, S.B., Booth, M.G., and Frischer, M.E. (2007). Building a diverse and innovative ocean workforce through collaboration and partner- ships that integrate research and education: HBCUs and marine laboratories. Journal of Geoscience Education, , 531-540. Goodlad, J.I., and Sirotnik, K.A. (1988). The future of school-university partnerships. In K.A. Sirotnik and J.I. Goodlad (Eds.), School-university partnerships in action (pp. 205-225). New York: Teachers College Press.

OCR for page 151
 NASA’S ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM Griffin, J. (1998). School-museum integrated learning experiences in science: A learning jour- ney. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney. Griffith, G., and Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 0(3), 35-48. Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Hammerman, J.K.L. (2007). The state of estuaries education: K- needs assessment. Cam- bridge, MA: TERC. Hassett, S., and Austin, M.J. (1997). Service integration: Something old and something new. Administration in Social Work, , 9-29. Hewson, P.W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S.K. Abell and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179-1203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hill, C.J., and Lynn, L.E. (2003). Producing human services: Why do agencies collaborate? Public Management Review, (1), 63-81. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Marathe, S., and Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, , 307-331. Hoffman, M., and Barstow, D. (2007). Revolutionizing earth system science education for the st century. (Report and recommendations from a 50-state analysis of earth science education standards). Cambridge, MA: TERC. Huffman, D., Thomas, K., and Lawrenz, F. (2003). Relationship between professional devel- opment, teachers’ instructional practices, and the achievement of students in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 0(8), 378-387. Huntoon, J., and Lane, M. (2007). Diversity in the geosciences and successful strategies for increasing diversity. Journal of Geoscience Education, (6), 447-457. Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children’s biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, , 119-129. Johnson, P. (1998). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 0(5), 567-583. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). Program evaluation stan- dards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Jones, M.G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., and Carter, G. (2007a). Un- derstanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, (2), 1059-1145. Jones, M.G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., and Oppewal, T. (2007b). Experienced and novice teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 0(3), 409-429. Kastens, K.A., and Rivet, A. (2008, January). Multiple modes of inquiry in earth science. Science Teacher, 26-31. Kastens, K.A., and Turrin, M. (2008). What are children being taught in school about anthro- pogenic climate change? In B. Ward and S. Mendez (Eds.), Communicating on climate change: An essential resource for journalists, scientists and educators (pp. 48-49). Kings- ton: University of Rhode Island. Kastens, K.A., Manduca, C.A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L.S., Mogk, D.W., Spangler, T.C., Stillings, N.A., and Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 0(31), 265-266. Kauffman Foundation. (2007). Education, entrepreneurship and immigration: America’s new immigrant entrepreneurs, Part II. Available: http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/ entrep_immigrants_1_070907.pdf [accessed October 2009].

OCR for page 151
 REFERENCES Klahr, D., Triona, L., and Siler, S. (2008). Virtual versus physical materials in early science in- struction: Transitioning to an autonomous tutor for experimental design. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, and L. Kester (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: The legacy of compe- tence (pp. 163-172). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Klahr, D., Triona, L.M., and Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical vs. virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, , 183-203. Kollmuss, A., and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, (3), 239-260. Leinhardt, G., and Crowley, K. (2002). Objects of learning, objects of talk: Changing minds in museums. In S. Paris (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on object-centered learning (pp. 301- 324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, , 1-2. Lemke, M., and Gonzales, P. (2006). U.S. student and adult performance on international as- sessments of educational achievement: Findings from The Condition of Education 00. (NCES #2006-073). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Levine, R., González, R., and Martínez-Sussmann, C. (2009). Learning diversity in earth sys- tem science. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.national academies.org/bose/NOAA%20Diversity.pdf [accessed March 2010]. Lewis, J.A. (2005). Waiting for Sputnik: Basic research and strategic competition. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available: http://csis.org/publication/ waiting-sputnik [accessed March 2010]. Longino, H.E. (2003). Does the structure of scientific revolutions permit a feminist revolu- tion in science? In T. Nickles (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (contemporary philosophy in focus). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N. and Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing professional de- velopment for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., and Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Louis, R.P. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: Using indigenous method- ologies in geographic research. Geographical Research, (2), 130-139. Lovelace, G. (2006). Evaluation of the benefits to scientists of participation in outreach and education projects related to Ocean Explorations Expeditions. Unpublished evaluation report. Mason, L., and Santi, M. (1998). Discussing the greenhouse effect: Children’s collaborative discourse-reasoning and conceptual change. Environmental Education Research, (1), 67-85. McBeth, B., Hungerford, H., Marcinkowski, T., Volk, T. and Meyers, R. (2008) National Environmental Literacy Assessment Project: Year , national baseline study of middle grades students. Final research report submitted to the Environmental Education Division of the Environmental Protection Agency and Office of Education of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. McKinsey and Company. (2009). The economic impact of the achievement gap in American schools. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com/App_Media/Images/Page_Images/Offices/ SocialSector/PDF/achievement_gap_report.pdf [accessed October 2009].

OCR for page 151
 NASA’S ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM Mertens, D., and Hopson, R. (2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. New Directions for Evaluation, 0, 35-51. Mewborn, D.S. (2003). Teaching, teachers, knowledge, and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin, and D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principals and standards for school mathematics (pp. 45-52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Moore, B., Rosen, R.D., Rosenberg, A.A., Spinrad, R.W., Washington, W.M., and West, R.D. (2004). Review of the organization and management of research in NOAA: A report to the NOAA science advisory board. Available: http://www.sab.noaa.gov/Reports/RRT_ Report-080604.pdf [accessed October 2009]. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., Olson, J.F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., Arora, A., and Galia, J. (2007). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 00. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 00: Adapting engineer- ing education to the new century. Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Phase II. Commit- tee on Engineering Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K- education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. L. Katehi, G. Pearson, and M. Feder (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Academy of Sciences. (1929). Report of the Committee of Oceanography for the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2000). Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for scientists and engineers: A guide for postdoctoral scholars, advisers, institutions, funding organizations, and disciplinary so- cieties. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology. Committee on Science, En- gineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Center on Education and the Economy. (2006). Tough choices for tough times: The report of the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. Washington, DC: Author. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2009). Education strategic plan 00- 0. Washington, DC: Author. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Science Advisory Board. (2008). Engag- ing NOAA’s constituents, a report from the NOAA Science Advisory Board: Putting the pieces together to create impacts. Available: http://www.sab.noaa.gov/Reports/EOEWG/ EOEWG_Final_Report_03_20_08.pdf [accessed February 2009]. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Commit- tee on Science Education Standards and Assessment Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 151
 REFERENCES National Research Council. (2002). New tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. T. Dietz and P.C. Stern (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2005). Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: Phase . Committee for the Assessment of NIH Minority Research Training Programs, Over- sight Committee for the Assessment of NIH Minority Research Training Programs. Board on Higher Education and Workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2006). Issues affecting the future of the U.S. space science and engineering workforce. Committee on Meeting the Workforce Needs for the National Vi- sion for Space Exploration, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A.W. Shouse (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2008). NASA’s elementary and secondary education program: Review and critique. Committee for the Review and Evaluation of NASA’s Precollege Education Program. H.R. Quinn, H.A. Schweingruber, and M.A. Feder (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A.W. Shouse, and M.A. Feder (Eds.). Board on Science, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Board. (2003). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America’s potential. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Board. (2004). Broadening participation in science and engineering faculty. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsb07114/nsb07114.pdf [accessed October 2009]. National Science Board. (2009). Science and engineering indicators: 00. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation. (1996). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: . Arlington, VA: Author. National Science Foundation. (2005). Federal obligations for basic research, by agency and performer: FY 00. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf09300/pdf/tab27.pdf [ac- cessed October 2009]. National Science Foundation. (2010). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: –00, detailed statistical tables. (NSF #10-300). Arlington, VA. Avail- able: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/ [accessed October 2009]. National Summit on Competitiveness. (2005). Statement of the National Summit on Competi- tiveness: Investing in U.S. innovation. Washington, DC: Author. North American Association for Environmental Education. (2004). Guidelines for the prepara- tion and professional development of environmental educators. Available: http://www. naaee.org/npeee/new_ee.php [accessed February 2009]. Ocean Explorer. (2002). The sea with no shores. Available: http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/ explorations/02sab/background/edu/media/sab_sargassum.pdf [accessed October 2009].

OCR for page 151
 NASA’S ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PROGRAM Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. (2004). Dive into education program: Executive sum- mary and evaluation. Available: http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/education/teachers/features/ diveeducation.html [accessed October 2009]. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. (2005a). West Coast LiMPETS teacher post-workshop evaluation. Unpublished evaluation report, Silver Spring, MD. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries. (2005b). National Marine Sanctuary Program Hawaii field study 00. Unpublished evaluation report, Silver Spring, MD. Pandion Systems. (2003). Inventory and assessment of K- and professional teacher de- velopment programs in NOAA’s national estuarine research reserve system. Available: http://www.estuaries.gov/estuaries101/Doc/PDF/InventoryK12Report.pdf [accessed Oc- tober 2009]. Pandion Systems. (2005). Estuaries live: Final report. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_ abstracts/INDEX.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/6118/report/F [accessed October 2009]. Pandion Systems. (2006). Estuaries live: Final report. Available: http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/ steinhardt/wallerstein/pdf_uploads/Online%20Hudson%20River%20Report%202005. pdf [accessed October 2009]. Pew Ocean Commission. (2003). America’s living oceans, charting a course for sea change. Avail- able: http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Protecting_ ocean_life/env_pew_oceans_final_report.pdf [accessed October 2009]. Plumb, C., and Reis, R.M. (2007). Creating change in engineering education: A model of col- laboration among institutions. Change, the Magazine of Higher Learning, (3), 22-29. Project Kaleidoscope. (2006). Transforming America’s scientific and technological infrastruc- ture: Recommendations for urgent action. Report on reports II. Available: http://www. pkal.org/documents/ReportOnReportsII.cfm [accessed October 2009]. Rockwell, K., and Bennett, C. (2004). Targeting outcomes of programs: A hierarchy for tar- geting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Available: http://digitalcommons.unl. edu/aglecfacpub/48 [accessed October 2009]. Scherer, J. (2008). A review of instruments to evaluate partnerships in math and science educa- tion. Journal of Education, (4), 611-636. Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives (vols. 1-2). New York: Teachers College Press. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Snively, G. (1995). Bridging traditional science and western science in the multicultural class- room. In G. Snively and A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Thinking globally about mathematics and science education (pp. 53-75). Vancouver: University of British Columbia. State Higher Education Executive Officers. (2008). State higher education finance FY 00. Available at http://www.sheeo.org/finance/shef_fy08.pd f [accessed October 2009]. Steel, B., Lovrich, N., Lach, D., and Fomenko, V. (2005) Correlates and consequences of public knowledge concerning ocean fisheries management. Coastal Management, (1), 37-51. Steel, B., Smith, C., Opsommer, L., Curiel, S., and Steel, R.W. (2005). Public ocean literacy in the United States. Ocean and Coastal Management, , 97-114. Stufflebeam, D. (2005) CIPP model (context, input, process, product). In S. Mathison (Ed.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 60-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stufflebeam, D., and Shinkfield, A. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

OCR for page 151
 REFERENCES Sullivan, D., Rosenfeld, L., and Murphree, T. (2007, winter). Certification for oceanographic professionals: A needs assessment study. Orion Newsletter, 5. Swanson, C.B. (2009). Cities in crisis 00: Closing the graduation gap. Bethesda, MD: Edito- rial Projects in Education. Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., Stern, P., and Weber, E. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multifaceted phenomenon and set of challenges. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Available: http://www. apa.org/science/climate-change [accessed October 2009]. Tai, R.H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., and Fan, X. (2006). Planning early careers in science. Sci- ence, , 1143-1144. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/312/5777/1143. pdf [accessed October 2007]. Tran, L. (2009). Children and adults’ understanding of ocean and climate sciences. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/ NOAA%20Teaching%20and%20Learning.pdf [accessed October 2009]. Tretter, T.R., Jones, M.G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., and Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual bound- aries and distances: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, , 282-319. Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students’ conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, (5), 447-467. Tytler, R., and Peterson, S. (2000). Deconstructing learning in science: Young children’s re- sponses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 0(4), 339-355. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). An older and more diverse nation by midcentury. Available: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html [ac- cessed July 2009]. U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. (2004). An ocean blueprint for the st century: Final re- port. Washington, DC. Available: http://oceancommission.gov/documents/full_color_rpt/ welcome.html [accessed February 2010]. U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Education. (2008). The shortage in the number of individuals with post-baccalaureate degrees in subjects related to fishery science. Available: http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/report_congress/ShortageOfDegrees.pdf [accessed October 2009]. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). The Elementary and Secondary Education Act: The No Child Left Behind Act of 00. Available: http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/ index.html [accessed October 2009]. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/ acc-mathscience/report.pdf [accessed October 2009]. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Revenues for public elementary and secondary schools, by source of funds: Selected years, -0 through 00-00. Available: http://nces. ed.gov/programs/digest/d08/tables/dt08_171.asp [accessed October 2009]. Uthe, R.E. (2000). Projecting the scientific method. Science Teacher, (9), 44-47. Windschitl, M., Thomson, J., and Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model- based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, (5), 941-967. Zacharia, Z.C., and Constantinou, C.P. (2008). Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature. American Journal of Physics, (4), 425-430.

OCR for page 151