References

Adjuvant! Inc. 2010. Welcome to adjuvant! Online. http://www.adjuvantonline.com/index.jsp (accessed January 20, 2010).

ASPH (Association of Schools of Public Health). 2009. Emory researchers aim to strengthen Georgia cancer data to evaluate care statewide. http://www.asph.org/fridayletter/article_view.cfm?FLE_Index=11175&FL_Index=1593 (accessed January 19, 2010).

Blumenthal, D. 2009. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 360(15):1477-1479.

Clancy, C. M. 2009. A learning health care system for cancer care. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. Powerpoint Presentation.

Dilts, D. M., A. Sandler, S. Cheng, J. Crites, L. Ferranti, A. Wu, R. Gray, J. MacDonald, D. Marinucci, and R. Comis. 2008. Development of clinical trials in a cooperative group setting: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Clinical Cancer Research 14(11):3427-3433.

Eddy, D. M. 2007. Linking electronic medical records to large-scale simulation models: Can we put rapid learning on turbo? Health Affairs 26(2):w125-w136.

Etheredge, L. M. 2007. A rapid-learning health system. Health Affairs 26(2):w107-w118.

Etheredge, L. M., and A. Abernethy. 2009. A rapid-learning system for cancer care: Two perspectives: System-centered & patient-centered. Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the George Washington University. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation.

Fisher, E. S., D. E. Wennberg, T. A. Stukel, D. J. Gottlieb, F. L. Lucas, and E. L. Pinder. 2003a. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4):273-287.

———. 2003b. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4):288-298.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 79
References Adjuvant! Inc. 2010. Welcome to adjuvant! Online. http://www.adjuvantonline.com/index.jsp (accessed January 20, 2010). ASPH (Association of Schools of Public Health). 2009. Emory researchers aim to strengthen Georgia cancer data to evaluate care statewide. http://www.asph.org/fridayletter/article_ view.cfm?FLE_Index=11175&FL_Index=1593 (accessed January 19, 2010). Blumenthal, D. 2009. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 360(15):1477-1479. Clancy, C. M. 2009. A learning health care system for cancer care. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October , 00. Washington, DC. Powerpoint Presentation. Dilts, D. M., A. Sandler, S. Cheng, J. Crites, L. Ferranti, A. Wu, R. Gray, J. MacDonald, D. Marinucci, and R. Comis. 2008. Development of clinical trials in a cooperative group setting: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Clinical Cancer Research 14(11):3427-3433. Eddy, D. M. 2007. Linking electronic medical records to large-scale simulation models: Can we put rapid learning on turbo? Health Affairs 26(2):w125-w136. Etheredge, L. M. 2007. A rapid-learning health system. Health Affairs 26(2):w107-w118. Etheredge, L. M., and A. Abernethy. 2009. A rapid-learning system for cancer care: Two perspectives: System-centered & patient-centered. Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the George Washington University. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation. Fisher, E. S., D. E. Wennberg, T. A. Stukel, D. J. Gottlieb, F. L. Lucas, and E. L. Pinder. 2003a. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4):273-287. ———. 2003b. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138(4):288-298. 

OCR for page 79
0 A FOUNDATION FOR EVIDENCE-DRIVEN PRACTICE Friedman, C. P. 2009. Building the foundation of a learning health care system: Meaningful use and all that jazz. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation. Georgia Cancer Coalition. 2009. George cancer quality information exchange. http://www. georgiacancer.org/res-gqie.php (accessed January 15, 2009). Hillner, B. E., B. A. Siegel, A. F. Shields, D. Liu, I. F. Gareen, L. Hanna, S. H. Stine, and R. E. Coleman. 2009. The impact of positron emission tomography (PET) on expected management during cancer treatment. Cancer 115(2):410-418. Hossain, F. 2009. Comparing cost and quality of health care across the country. New York Times, September 8. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ———. 2005. Assessing the quality of cancer care: An approach to measurement in Georgia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ———. 2007. The learning healthcare system: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ———. 2008. Knowing what works in health care: A road map for the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ———. 2009a. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ———. 2009b. Workshop on assessing and improving the value of cancer care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Kupersmith, J., J. Francis, E. Kerr, S. Krein, L. Pogach, R. M. Kolodner, and J. B. Perlin. 2007. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: Lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Affairs 26(2):w156-w168. Liang, L. 2007. The gap between evidence and practice. Health Affairs 26(2):w119-w121. Lipscomb, J. 2009. Strengthening state cancer registry data by linking to public and private sources. Emory University. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation. Lumpkin, J. R. 2007. Archimedes: A bold step into the future. Health Affairs 26(2): w137-w139. NCI (National Cancer Institute). 2009. SEER-Medicare linked database. http://healthservices. cancer.gov/seermedicare/ (accessed January 21, 2010). ———. 2010a. About caBIG®. https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/overview/ (accessed January 19, 2010). ———. 2010b. SEER web site: Home. http://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed January 21, 2010). Neti, C. 2009. An evidence-enhanced healthcare ecosystem for cancer: I/T perspectives. IBM. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation. Neumann, P. J. 2007. Challenges ahead for federal technology assessment. Health Affairs 26(2):w150-w152. NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OCR for page 79
 REFERENCES PatientsLikeMe. 2009. About. http://www.patientslikeme.com/about (accessed September 15, 2009). Pawlson, L. G. 2007. Health information technology: Does it facilitate or hinder rapid learning? Health Affairs 26(2):w178-w180. Perlin, J. B., and J. Kupersmith. 2007. Information technology and the inferential gap. Health Affairs 26(2):w192-w194. Platt, R. 2007. Speed bumps, potholes, and tollbooths on the road to panacea: Making best use of data. Health Affairs 26(2):w153-w155. Ravdin, P. M., L. A. Siminoff, G. J. Davis, M. B. Mercer, J. Hewlett, N. Gerson, and H. L. Parker. 2001. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 19(4):980-991. Slutsky, J. R. 2007. Moving closer to a rapid-learning health care system. Health Affairs 26(2): w122-w124. Stead, W. W. 2007. Introduction and overview. Evidence-based medicine and the changing nature of health care: 00 IOM annual meeting summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ———. 2009. Central conclusions of NRC report. Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Forum, October 5, 2009. Washington, DC. PowerPoint Presentation. Stewart, W. F., N. R. Shah, M. J. Selna, R. A. Paulus, and J. M. Walker. 2007. Bridging the inferential gap: The electronic health record and clinical evidence. Health Affairs 26(2): w181-w191. Tunis, S. R., T. V. Carino, R. D. Williams 2nd, and P. B. Bach. 2007. Federal initiatives to support rapid learning about new technologies. Health Affairs 26(2):w140-w149. Wallace, P. J. 2007. Reshaping cancer learning through the use of health information technology. Health Affairs 26(2):w169-w177.

OCR for page 79