|
Year
|
Author
|
Focus
|
Field/Summary and Commentary
|
|
|
Webb and Lin
|
Nomenclature: First report of biomarker in title of publication
|
Oncology
Urinary fibronectin: Potential as a biomarker in prostatic cancer.
|
|
1982
|
Waalkes et al.
|
Biomarkers for clinical application
|
Oncology
Feasibility study in the development of 17 biological markers for ovarian cancer.
|
|
1983
|
Wood
|
Nomenclature: First report of surrogate AND endpoint, second report of surrogate AND outcome
|
Rheumatology
Nature of surrogate endpoints. Relationships considered at two levels: (1) ability of the attribute to act as a surrogate in detection of the underlying state (at a particular point in time); (2) potential of the surrogate to reveal changes in the underlying state as its course unfolds.
|
|
1986
|
Bigger
|
Second surrogate and endpoint, third surrogate and outcome
|
Cardiology
Electrophysiological testing to select patients with ventricular arrhythmias for drug trials and to determine anti-arrhythmic drug efficacy. (By the end of the decade, the use of biomarkers as surrogates in cardiology had a number of high-profile failures.)
|
|
|
Buccheri et al.
|
First report of biomarker as measure of tumor burden and predict outcome
|
Oncology
Clinical value of a multiple biomarker assay (CEA, TPA, b-HCG, LDH) in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma.
|
|
1987
|
Kalish et al.
|
Third surrogate and endpoint
|
Oncology
Surrogates as endpoints in bladder cancer trials. Data show that superficial disease endpoints do not predict surrogates for invasive disease endpoints.
|
|
|
Schulof et al.
|
Surrogates markers first used as response to therapy
|
HIV
Phase I/II trial of thymosin fraction 5 and thymosin alpha one in HTLV-III–seropositive subjects.
|