. "References." Evaluation of the Health and Safety Risks of the New USAMRIID High Containment Facilities at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Evalution of the Health and Safety Risks of the New USAMRIID High-Containment Facilities at Fort Detrick, Maryland
CDC/NIH (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health). 2007. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 5th Ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office [online]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/biosfty/bmbl5/BMBL_5th_Edition.pdf [accessed Oct. 19, 2009].
Cole, B.L., M. Wilhelm, P.V. Long, J.E. Fielding, G. Kominski, and H. Morgenstern. 2004. Prospects for health impact assessment in the United States: New and improved environmental impact assessment or something different? J. Health Polit. Polic. Law 29(6):1153-1186.
DHS (U.S. Department of Homeland Security). 2008. National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Final Environmental Impact Statement. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. December 2008 [online]. Available: http://www.dhs.gov/files/labs/gc_1187734676776.shtm#1 [accessed Oct. 19, 2009].
DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2004. Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements, 2nd Ed. U.S. Department of Energy. December 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.gc.energy.gov/NEPA/documents/green_book2004_12_30_final.pdf [accessed Dec. 4, 2009].
DSB (Defense Science Board). 2009. Department of Defense Biological Safety and Security Program, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Washington, DC. May 2009 [online]. Available: http://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsb/biosafety.pdf [accessed Oct. 20, 2009].
GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2009. Biological Research, Observations of DHS’s Analyses Concerning Whether FMD Research Can Be Done as Safely on the Mainland as on Plum Island. GAO-09-747. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office [online]. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09747.pdf [accessed Jan. 15, 2010].
Harding, A.L., and K.B. Byers. 2000. Epidemiology of laboratory-associated infections. Pp. 35-54 in Biological Safety: Principles and Practices, 3rd Ed., D.O. Fleming and D.L. Hunt, eds. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
Keith, K., and S. Wagener. 2004. Community relations for high containment laboratories: The Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health Model. Chapter 14 in Anthology of Biosafety VII: Biosafety Level 3, J.Y. Richmond, ed. Mundelein, IL: American Biological Safety Association.
London School of Tropical Medicine. 1974. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Small Pox Outbreak in London in March and April 1973. London: H.M.S.O.
Meiklejohn, G., L.S. Reimer, P.S. Graves, and C. Helmick. 1981. Cryptic epidemic of Q fever in a medical school. J. Infect. Dis. 144(2):107-113.
National Academy of Sciences. 1995. On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NIGMS (National Institute of General Medical Sciences). 2010. Using Computers to Prepare for Disease Outbreaks. Modeling Infectious Disease Fact Sheet. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Bethesda, MD [online]. Available: http://www.nigms.nih.gov/Initiatives/MIDAS/Background/Factsheet.htm [accessed Feb. 22, 2010.
NIH (National Insitutes of Health). 2004. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Integrated Research Facility, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana. April 2004 [online]. Available: http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/Biodefense/Public/PDF/1_Summary_F.pdf [accessed Oct. 20, 2009].